Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 259

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Population-Based Study of Disability and Institutionalization After Transient Ischemic Attack and Stroke: 10-Year Results of the Oxford Vascular Study

Open access
Luengo-Fernandez, Ramon, Paul, Nicola L.M., Gray, Alastair M., Pendlebury, Sarah T., Bull, Linda M., Welch, Sarah J.V., Cuthbertson, Fiona C., Rothwell, Peter M.·2013·Stroke

Abstract

Background and Purpose—: Long-term outcome information after transient ischemic attack (TIA) and stroke is required to help plan and allocate care services. We evaluated the impact of TIA and stroke on disability and institutionalization over 5 years using data from a population-based study. Methods—: Patients from a UK population-based cohort study (Oxford Vascular Study) were recruited from 2002 to 2007 and followed up to 2012. Patients were followed up at 1, 6, 12, 24, and 60 months postevent and assessed using the modified Rankin scale. A multivariate regression analysis was performed to assess the predictors of disability postevent. Results—: A total of 748 index stroke and 440 TIA cases were studied. For patients with TIA, disability levels increased from 14% (63 of 440) premorbidly to 23% (60 of 256) at 5 years ( P =0.002), with occurrence of subsequent stroke being a major predictor of disability. For stroke survivors, the proportion disabled (modified Rankin scale >2) increased from 21% (154 of 748) premorbidly to 43% (273 of 634) at 1 month ( P <0.001), with 39% (132 of 339) of survivors disabled 5 years after stroke. Five years postevent, 70% (483 of 690) of patients with stroke and 48% (179 of 375) of patients with TIA were either dead or disabled. The 5-year risk of care home institutionalization was 11% after TIA and 19% after stroke. The average 5-year cost per institutionalized patient was $99 831 (SD, 67 020) for TIA and $125 359 (SD, 91 121) for stroke. Conclusions—: Our results show that 70% of patients with stroke are either dead or disabled 5 years after the event. Thus, there remains considerable scope for improvements in acute treatment and secondary prevention to reduce postevent disability and institutionalization.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/strokeaha.113.001584

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 259

Metadata

Authors
Luengo-Fernandez, R., Paul, N. L. M., Gray, A. M., Pendlebury, S. T., Bull, L. M., Welch, S. J. V., Cuthbertson, F. C., & Rothwell, P. M.
Venue
Stroke
Published
2013-10
Volume
44
Issue
10
Pages
2854-2861
ISSN
  • 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4628
OpenAlex
W2140611397
Cited by
259
References
4
FWCI
8.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Population-Based Study of Disability and Institutionalization After Transient Ischemic Attack and Stroke: 10-Year Results of the Oxford Vascular Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/strokeaha.113.001584
The paper
Luengo-Fernandez, R., Paul, N. L. M., Gray, A. M., Pendlebury, S. T., Bull, L. M., Welch, S. J. V., Cuthbertson, F. C., & Rothwell, P. M. (2013). Population-Based Study of Disability and Institutionalization After Transient Ischemic Attack and Stroke: 10-Year Results of the Oxford Vascular Study. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/strokeaha.113.001584

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.