The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Long-Term Risk and Predictors of Recurrent Stroke Beyond the Acute Phase
Abstract
Background and Purpose—: Previous studies have shown heterogeneous results on predictors and rates of stroke recurrence. This study set out to investigate the long-term risk and predictors of recurrent stroke in Northern Sweden 1995 to 2008. Methods—: In the population-based Monitoring Trends and Determinants of Cardiovascular Disease (MONICA) stroke incidence registry, stroke survivors of either ischemic stroke or intracerebral hemorrhage were followed for recurrent stroke or death. Cox regression was used to identify predictors of stroke recurrence. Results—: The study comprised 6700 patients and 26 597 person-years. During follow-up, 928 (13.9%) patients had a recurrent stroke. Comparison between the first time period (1995–1998) and the last (2004–2008) showed declined risk of stroke recurrence (hazard ratio, 0.64 [95% confidence interval, 0.52–0.78]). Previous myocardial infarction was less prevalent in the most recent cohort ( P <0.001). Predictors of stroke recurrence were age (hazard ratio, 1.03 [95% confidence interval, 1.02–1.04]) and diabetes mellitus (hazard ratio, 1.34 [95% confidence interval, 1.15–1.57]). After an index intracerebral hemorrhage (n=815), a major part of recurrent events were ischemic (63%), and compared with the ischemic stroke group (n=5885), a tendency toward lower risk of recurrence was observed. Conclusions—: Despite declining recurrence rates in this relatively young stroke population, almost one third are either dead or have experienced a second stroke in 5 years.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2020 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association
Virani, S. S., Alonso, A., Benjamin, E. J., Bittencourt, M. S., Callaway, C. W., Carson, A. P., Chamberlain, A. M., Chang, A. R., Cheng, S., Delling, F. N., et al. (2020) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000000757 · Cited by 9,175
Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2019 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association
Benjamin, E. J., Muntner, P., Alonso, A., Bittencourt, M. S., Callaway, C. W., Carson, A. P., Chamberlain, A. M., Chang, A. R., Cheng, S., Das, S. R., et al. (2019) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000000659 · Cited by 9,036
Heart disease and stroke statistics-2018 update: a report from the american heart association
Benjamin, E. J., Virani, S. S., Callaway, C. W., Chamberlain, A. M., Chang, A. R., Cheng, S., Chiuve, S. E., Cushman, M., Delling, F. N., Deo, R., et al. (2018) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000000558 · Cited by 7,146
Risk and Secondary Prevention of Stroke Recurrence: A Population-Base Cohort Study
Flach, C., Muruet, W., Wolfe, C. D. A., Bhalla, A., & Douiri, A. (2020) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/strokeaha.120.028992 · Cited by 336
van Leeuwen, K. G., Meijer, F. J. A., Schalekamp, S., Rutten, M. J. C. M., van Dijk, E. J., van Ginneken, B., Govers, T. M., & de Rooij, M. (2021) · Insights into Imaging · doi:10.1186/s13244-021-01077-4 · Cited by 70
Metadata
- Authors
- Pennlert, J., Eriksson, M., Carlberg, B., & Wiklund, P.-G.
- Venue
- Stroke
- Published
- 2014-06
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1839-1841
- ISSN
- 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4628
- OpenAlex
- W2163915749
- Cited by
- 158
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Long-Term Risk and Predictors of Recurrent Stroke Beyond the Acute Phase. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/strokeaha.114.005060
- The paper
- Pennlert, J., Eriksson, M., Carlberg, B., & Wiklund, P.-G. (2014). Long-Term Risk and Predictors of Recurrent Stroke Beyond the Acute Phase. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/strokeaha.114.005060
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.