Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 336

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Risk and Secondary Prevention of Stroke Recurrence: A Population-Base Cohort Study

Open access
Flach, Clare, Muruet, Walter, Wolfe, Charles D.A., Bhalla, Ajay, Douiri, Abdel·2020·Stroke

Abstract

Background and Purpose: With recent advances in secondary prevention management, stroke recurrence rates may have changed substantially. We aim to estimate risks and trends of stroke recurrence over the past 2 decades in a population-based cohort of patients with stroke. Methods: Patients with a first-ever stroke between 1995 and 2018 in South London, United Kingdom (n=6052) were collected and analyzed. Rates of recurrent stroke with 95% CIs were stratified by 5-year period of index stroke and etiologic TOAST (Trial of ORG 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment) subtype. Cumulative incidences were estimated and multivariate Cox models applied to examine associations of recurrence and recurrence-free survival. Results: The rate of stroke recurrence at 5 years reduced from 18% (95% CI, 15%–21%) in those who had their stroke in 1995 to 1999 to 12% (10%–15%) in 2000 to 2005, and no improvement since. Recurrence-free survival has improved (35%, 1995–1999; 67%, 2010–2015). Risk of recurrence or death is lowest for small-vessel occlusion strokes and other ischemic causes (36% and 27% at 5 years, respectively). For cardioembolic and hemorrhagic index strokes around half of first recurrences are of the same type (54% and 51%, respectively). Over the whole study period a 54% increased risk of recurrence was observed among those who had atrial fibrillation before the index stroke (hazard ratio, 1.54 [1.09–2.17]). Conclusions: The rate of recurrence reduced until mid-2000s but has not changed over the last decade. The majority of cardioembolic or hemorrhagic strokes that have a recurrence are stroke of the same type indicating that the implementation of effective preventive strategies is still suboptimal in these stroke subtypes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/strokeaha.120.028992

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 29 references

Cited by

See all 336

Metadata

Authors
Flach, C., Muruet, W., Wolfe, C. D. A., Bhalla, A., & Douiri, A.
Venue
Stroke
Published
2020-08
Volume
51
Issue
8
Pages
2435-2444
ISSN
  • 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4628
OpenAlex
W3042131576
Cited by
336
References
29
FWCI
19.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Risk and Secondary Prevention of Stroke Recurrence: A Population-Base Cohort Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/strokeaha.120.028992
The paper
Flach, C., Muruet, W., Wolfe, C. D. A., Bhalla, A., & Douiri, A. (2020). Risk and Secondary Prevention of Stroke Recurrence: A Population-Base Cohort Study. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/strokeaha.120.028992

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.