Cited by 307Mesenchymal stem cell researchAcute Ischemic Stroke ManagementStroke Rehabilitation and Recovery

Intravenous Autologous Bone Marrow Mononuclear Stem Cell Therapy for Ischemic Stroke: A Multicentric, Randomized Trial

Prasad, Kameshwar, Sharma, Alka, Garg, Ajay, Mohanty, Sujata, Bhatnagar, Shinjini, Johri, Sharat, Singh, Kunwar Karni, Nair, Velu +9 more·2014·Stroke

Abstract

Background and Purpose—: Pilot studies have suggested benefit from intravenous administration of bone marrow mononuclear stem cells (BMSCs) in stroke. We explored the efficacy and safety of autologous BMSCs in subacute ischemic stroke. Methods—: This was a phase II, multicenter, parallel group, randomized trial with blinded outcome assessment that included 120 patients. Patients with subacute ischemic stroke were randomly assigned to the arm that received intravenous infusion of autologous BMSCs or to control arm. Coprimary clinical efficacy outcomes were Barthel Index score and modified Rankin scale at day 180. Secondary outcomes were change in infarct volume, National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) at day 90 and 180. Main safety outcomes were adverse events, any new area of 18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography uptake in any body part over 365 days. Results—: Fifty-eight patients received a mean of 280.75 million BMSCs at median of 18.5 days after stroke onset. There was no significant difference between BMSCs arm and control arm in the Barthel Index score (63.1 versus 63.6; P =0.92), modified Rankin scale shift analysis ( P =0.53) or score >3 (47.5% versus 49.2%; P =0.85), NIHSS score (6.3 versus 7.0; P =0.53), change in infarct volume (−11.1 versus −7.36; P =0.63) at day 180. Adverse events were also similar in the 2 arms, and no patient showed any new area of 18 fluorodeoxyglucose uptake. Conclusions—: With the methods used, results of this hitherto first randomized controlled trial indicate that intravenous infusion of BMSCs is safe, but there is no beneficial effect of treatment on stroke outcome. Clinical Trial Registration—: URLs: http://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials and http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifiers: CTRI-ROVCTRI/2008/091/0004 and NCT0150177.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/strokeaha.114.007028

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • MSC transplantation for acute stroke improves patient symptoms and promotes neurological recovery in ischemic stroke patients without adverse effects.

    “MSC transplantation for acute stroke improves patient symptoms and promotes neurological recovery in ischemic stroke patients without adverse effects.360–362”

    From Inflammation and aging: signaling pathways and intervention therapies (2023) · cites this paper as [360]

    The Discussion concludes that bone marrow mononuclear stem cell therapy was safe but ineffective for moderately severe subacute ischemic stroke. The Abstract reports no significant improvement in functional or neurological outcomes versus controls. Adverse events were comparable between groups, not absent. (LLM, conf=0.94)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Prasad, K., Sharma, A., Garg, A., Mohanty, S., Bhatnagar, S., Johri, S., Singh, K. K., Nair, V., Sarkar, R. S., Gorthi, S. P., Hassan, K. M., Prabhakar, S., Marwaha, N., Khandelwal, N., Misra, U. K., Kalita, J., & Nityanand, S.
Affiliations
Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences (IN)
Venue
Stroke
Published
2014-12
Volume
45
Issue
12
Pages
3618-3624
ISSN
  • 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4628
OpenAlex
W1993845966
Cited by
307
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 11
FWCI
15.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Stroke (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Mesenchymal stem cell research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Keywords
ischemic stroke, subacute stroke, stroke outcome, functional recovery, infarct size, safety, adverse events, 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake
MeSH terms
Aged, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Bone Marrow Transplantation, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Recovery of Function, Stroke

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review