Cited by 21Ethics in Clinical ResearchInterpreting and Communication in HealthcareAcute Ischemic Stroke Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Dedicated Spanish Language Line Increases Enrollment of Hispanics Into Prehospital Clinical Research

Abstract

Background and Purpose—: Novel methods are needed to reduce the disparity of Hispanic enrollment in stroke clinical trials. Prehospital enrollment using a dedicated Spanish language line may help overcome this bias. Methods—: Subjects or legally authorized representatives provided information on race and ethnicity for all cases enrolled in the FAST-MAG clinical trial (Field Administration of Stroke Therapy-Magnesium), a prehospital phase 3 randomized study of intravenous magnesium for neuroprotection. One of 2 in-ambulance cell phones (in English or Spanish) was used to obtain informed content in the field. We describe the yield and characteristics of subjects enrolled via Spanish line. Results—: There were 1700 subjects enrolled from 2005 to 2012, of which 402 (24%) identified as Hispanic ethnicity. Study racial makeup was 1325 (78%) white, 219 (13%) black, and 139 (8%) Asian. The dedicated Spanish line was used for 195 (12%) enrollments. Spanish-line enrollments were younger (65 versus 70 years old; P <0.001), more likely to identify as Hispanic (98% versus 14%; P <0.001), and more likely to present with intracerebral hemorrhage (36% versus 21%; P <0.001). Conclusions—: The use of a dedicated Spanish language enrollment line allowed for greater enrollment of Hispanics, a population with significantly different baseline characteristics. Clinical Trial Registration—: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00059332.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/strokeaha.117.014745

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A total of 12 included articles were assessed with an MMAT score below 3, including two RCTs, three non-randomised studies, six quantitative descriptive studies and one mixed methods study.

    “A total of 12 articles were assessed with a score of below 3. This included two RCTs [61, 66], three non-randomised studies [15, 46, 64], six quantitative descriptive studies [9, 37, 38, 40, 57, 58] and one mixed methods study [60].”
  • Seven included studies centred on the recruitment of Hispanic or Latin American individuals.

    “Although 7 studies centred on the recruitment of Hispanic or Latin American individuals [12, 15, 36, 50, 51, 57, 66], most of them did not differentiate between the terms Hispanic”
  • Present-day challenges such as language barriers, cultural differences and a lack of cultural competence can make it difficult for researchers to rebuild trust and establish clear communication with potential participants.

    “Beyond these historical issues, present-day challenges such as language barriers, cultural differences and a lack of cultural competence can make it difficult for researchers to effectively rebuild trust and establish clear communication with potential participants [14–17].”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Sanossian, N., Rosenberg, L., Liebeskind, D. S., Starkman, S., Eckstein, M., Stratton, S., Pratt, F. D., Hamilton, S., Kim-Tenser, M., Sharma, L. K., Restrepo, L., Valdes-Suieras, M., Conwit, R., & Saver, J. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • From the Departments of Neurology (N.S., L.R., M.K.-T.) and Emergency Medicine (M.E.), University of Southern California, Los Angeles; UCLA Stroke Center, Los Angeles, CA (D.S.L., S.S., L.K.S., L.R., M.V.-S., J.L.S.); School of Public Health, University of California Los Angeles (S.S.); Los Angeles County Fire Department, CA (F.D.P.); Stanford University, CA (S.H.); and National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD (R.C.).
Venue
Stroke
Published
2017-05
Volume
48
Issue
5
Pages
1389-1391
ISSN
  • 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4628
OpenAlex
W2604259122
Cited by
21
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Stroke (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (U01NS044364)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
Keywords
language barriers, stroke clinical trials, FAST-MAG trial, intravenous magnesium, neuroprotection, racial and ethnic disparities, intracerebral hemorrhage
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, California, Cerebral Hemorrhage, Clinical Trials as Topic, Emergency Medical Technicians, Female, Hispanic or Latino, Humans, Language, Magnesium, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Selection, Neuroprotective Agents, Stroke, Biomedical Research, Cell Phone, Culturally Competent Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review