The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Caregiver-Delivered Stroke Rehabilitation in Rural China: The RECOVER Randomized Controlled Trial
Open accessAbstract
Background and Purpose—: Stroke disability is a major health burden in rural China where rehabilitation services are inadequate. We aimed to determine the effectiveness of a novel nurse-led, caregiver-delivered model of stroke rehabilitation in rural China. Methods—: A multicenter prospective, randomized open, blinded outcome assessed, controlled trial was conducted in 3 rural county hospitals in China: Zhangwu, Liaoning Province (Northeast); Qingtongxia, Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region (Northwest); and Dianjiang, Chongqing Municipality (Southwest). Adult patients (age 18–79 years) with residual disability (Barthel Index score ≤80/100) after a recent acute stroke were randomized to a new service model or usual care. The new intervention was multifaceted and was based on a task-shifting / training-the-trainers model, supported by a custom-designed smartphone application, where patients and caregivers received evidence-based in-hospital education and stroke rehabilitation training (focus on mobility, self-care, and toileting), delivered by trained nurses before hospital discharge, and 3 postdischarge support telephone calls. Outcome assessments were undertaken before hospital discharge and at 3 and 6 months. Primary outcome was physical functioning (Barthel Index scores) at 6 months, assessed by research staff blind to treatment allocation, adjusted for baseline covariates in an intention-to-treat analysis. Secondary outcomes included measures of mobility, health-related quality of life, mood, and caregiver burden. The study included a process evaluation that assessed intervention fidelity. Results—: From November 2014 to December 2016, 246 stroke patients were randomized to intervention (n=118) or control (n=128) groups. There was no statistically significant difference in adjusted 6-month Barthel Index scores between groups (70.1 versus 74.1, mean difference, −4.0 [95% CI, −10.0 to 2.9]), nor any differences across the other outcome measures. Process evaluation interviews revealed that the intervention was desirable and positively accepted by nurses, caregivers, and patients but was considered too complex despite efforts to simplify materials for the rural context. Key strategies identified for future studies included the use of community health workers, smartphone application enhancement, and simpler and more frequent training for nurses, caregivers, and patients. Conclusions—: A novel nurse-led, digital supported, caregiver-delivered stroke rehabilitation program did not improve patient physical functioning after stroke in rural China. Further stroke rehabilitation research suitable for resource-poor settings is required, with several components being suggested through stakeholder interviews in our study. Clinical Trial Registration—: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT02247921.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Decision on evaluations and intervention duration was made after reviewing recent and similar published papers showing main changes between groups 3 months after discharge, and Barthel Index and mRS were the most widely used evaluations.
“Decision on evaluations and intervention duration was made after reviewing recent and similar published papers, as showing main changes between groups 3 months after discharge [3, 4, 49, 53, 58] and being Barthel Index and the mRS the most widely used evaluations [3, 4, 53, 59].”
From Early Occupational Therapy Intervention post-stroke (EOTIPS): A randomized controlled trial (2024) · cites this paper as [58]
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 25 · Cited by 96
Research works printed but not linked: 22
- 10.1586/14737167.8.4.349 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0165341 · DOI
- Jianjun, Y, Yongshan, H, Wu, Y, Wenhua, C, Yulian, Z, Xiao, C, et al. The effects of community-based rehabilitation on stroke patients in china: a single-blind, randomized controlled multicentre trial. Clin Rehabil. 2009;23:408–417 · DOI
- Xianghong Meng, WW, Hong, Dai. Investigation on current status of rehabilitation of stroke at Chongwen district in Beijing. Chin J Rehabil Med. 2009;24:4.
- 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2004.00943.x · DOI
- 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31447-2 · DOI
- 10.3310/hta17460 · DOI
- 10.1002/14651858.CD011058.pub2 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0004-9514(14)60285-3 · DOI
- 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005983 · DOI
- 10.1177/1747493016654290 · DOI
- Mahoney, FI, Barthel, DW. Functional evaluation: the barthel index. Md State Med J. 1965;14:61–65.
- 10.1161/01.STR.30.8.1538 · DOI
- 10.1161/01.STR.0000119385.56094.32 · DOI
- 10.1155/2016/9482876 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.06.764 · DOI
- 10.1111/appy.12103 · DOI
- Gusi, N, Olivares, PR, Rajendram, R. The eq-5d health-related quality of life questionnaire. Preedy, VR, Watson, RR, eds. In: Handbook of Disease Burdens and Quality of Life Measures. New York, NY: Springer; 2010.
- 10.1016/j.pedn.2014.04.006 · DOI
- Reding, MJ, Potes, E. Rehabilitation outcome following initial unilateral hemispheric stroke. Life table analysis approach. Stroke. 1988;19:1354–1358. · DOI
- Yu, J, Yu, Y, Fan, JT, Xu, Y, Hao, FC. Impact of different treatment and evaluation methods on stroke rehabilitation effect. Tianjin Med J. 2010;11:2.
- Shah, S, Vanclay, F, Cooper, B. Efficiency, effectiveness, and duration of stroke rehabilitation. Stroke. 1990;21:241–246. · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhou, B., Zhang, J., Zhao, Y., Li, X., Anderson, C. S., Xie, B., Wang, N., Zhang, Y., Tang, X., Prvu Bettger, J., Chen, S., Gu, W., Luo, R., Zhao, Q., Li, X., Sun, Z., Lindley, R. I., Lamb, S. E., Wu, Y., Shi, J., & Yan, L. L.
- Affiliations
- First Hospital of China Medical University (CN)
- Peking University (CN)
- Ningxia Medical University (CN)
- Peking University First Hospital (CN)
- Chongqing Medical University (CN)
- Duke Clinical Research Institutea (J.P.B.), Duke University, Durham, NC
- Duke Kunshan University (CN)
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Duke University (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Stroke
- Published
- 2019-07
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1825-1830
- ISSN
- 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4628
- OpenAlex
- W2953328237
- Cited by
- 96
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6
- FWCI
- 6.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc
- Locations
- Stroke (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UNSWorks (University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (NF-SI-0611-10020)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing care and research
- Keywords
- stroke rehabilitation, nurse-led intervention, rural China, task shifting, trainer training, mobile application, Barthel Index, physical function, stroke disability, caregiver burden, health-related quality of life, resource-limited settings, community health workers, intervention fidelity, process evaluation
- MeSH terms
- Smartphone, Stroke Rehabilitation, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, China, Delivery of Health Care, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Quality of Life, Rural Population, Treatment Outcome, Caregivers, Cost of Illness, Recovery of Function, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review