The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Standardized Nomenclature for Modified Rankin Scale Global Disability Outcomes: Consensus Recommendations From Stroke Therapy Academic Industry Roundtable XI
Abstract
The modified Rankin Scale (mRS), a 7-level, clinician-reported, measure of global disability, is the most widely employed outcome scale in acute stroke trials. The scale’s original development preceded the advent of modern clinimetrics, but substantial subsequent work has been performed to enable the mRS to meet robust contemporary scale standards. Prior research and consensus recommendations have focused on modernizing 2 aspects of the mRS: operationalized assignment of scale scores and statistical analysis of scale distributions. Another important characteristic of the mRS still requiring elaboration and specification to contemporary clinimetric standards is the Naming of scale outcomes. Recent clinical trials have used a bewildering variety, often mutually contradictory, of rubrics to describe scale states. Understanding of the meaning of mRS outcomes by clinicians, patients, and other clinical trial stakeholders would be greatly enhanced by use of a harmonized, uniform set of labels for the distinctive mRS outcomes that would be used consistently across trials. This statement advances such recommended rubrics, developed by the Stroke Therapy Academic Industry Roundtable collaboration using an iterative, mixed-methods process. Specific guidance is provided for health state terms (eg, Symptomatic but Nondisabled for mRS score 1; requires constant care for mRS score 5) and valence terms (eg, excellent for mRS score 1; very poor for mRS score 5) to employ for 23 distinct numeric mRS outcomes, including: all individual 7 mRS levels; all 12 positive and negative dichotomized mRS ranges, positive and negative sliding dichotomies; and utility-weighted analysis of the mRS.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Banks, J. L., & Marotta, C. A. (2007) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.0000258355.23810.c6 · Cited by 2,253
2017 Cardiovascular and Stroke Endpoint Definitions for Clinical Trials
Hicks, K. A., Mahaffey, K. W., Mehran, R., Nissen, S. E., Wiviott, S. D., Dunn, B., Solomon, S. D., Marler, J. R., Teerlink, J. R., Farb, A., et al. (2018) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.117.033502 · Cited by 750
Statistical Analysis of the Primary Outcome in Acute Stroke Trials
Bath, P. M. W., Lees, K. R., Schellinger, P. D., Altman, H., Bland, M., Hogg, C., Howard, G., & Saver, J. L. (2012) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/strokeaha.111.641456 · Cited by 266
Self-citationContemporary Outcome Measures in Acute Stroke Research: Choice of Primary Outcome Measure
Lees, K. R., Bath, P. M. W., Schellinger, P. D., Kerr, D. M., Fulton, R., Hacke, W., Matchar, D., Sehra, R., & Toni, D. (2012) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/strokeaha.111.641423 · Cited by 242
Cited by
Endovascular Treatment for Stroke Due to Occlusion of Medium or Distal Vessels
Psychogios, M., Brehm, A., Ribo, M., Rizzo, F., Strbian, D., Räty, S., Arenillas, J. F., Martínez-Galdámez, M., Hajdu, S. D., Michel, P., et al. (2025) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2408954 · Cited by 270
Self-citationMendis, D. D., Vallamchetla, S. K., Marin Collazo, I. V., Sandhu, S. J. S., & Meschia, J. F. (2026) · Neurology Genetics · doi:10.1212/nxg.0000000000200430
Metadata
- Authors
- Saver, J. L., Chaisinanunkul, N., Campbell, B. C. V., Grotta, J. C., Hill, M. D., Khatri, P., Landen, J., Lansberg, M. G., Venkatasubramanian, C., Albers, G. W., & Roundtable, O. B. O. T. X. S. T. A. I.
- Venue
- Stroke
- Published
- 2021-09
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 3054-3062
- ISSN
- 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4628
- OpenAlex
- W3183660339
- Cited by
- 323
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 19.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.