Privilege and Position
Abstract
How does being a woman affect one’s epistemic life? What about being Black? Or queer? Standpoint theorists argue that such social positions can give rise to otherwise unavailable epistemic privilege. “Epistemic privilege” is a murky concept, however. Critics of standpoint theory argue that the view is offered without a clear explanation of how standpoints confer their benefits, what those benefits are, or why social positions are particularly apt to produce them. For this reason, many regard standpoint theory as being out of step with epistemology more broadly. But this need not be so. This article articulates a minimal version of standpoint epistemology that avoids these criticisms and supports the normative goals of its feminist forerunners. This account serves as the foundation for developing a formal model in which to explore standpoint epistemology using neighborhood semantics for modal logic.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Being oppressed is a necessary condition for having some of the experiences that are epistemically advantageous, but it is not a sufficient condition for occupying an epistemically privileged standpoint.
“While being oppressed is a necessary condition for having some of the experiences that are epistemically advantageous (in that they increase one's evidential base), it is not a sufficient condition for occupying an epistemically privileged standpoint, any more than 'being employed as an oncologist' is a sufficient condition for expert status”
From Standpoint Epistemology and Epistemic Peerhood: A Defense of Epistemic Privilege (2024) · cites this paper as Saint-Croix 2020: 492
Cites
Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing
Fricker, M. (2007) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198237907.001.0001 · Cited by 9,198 · see citing works
Tracking Epistemic Violence, Tracking Practices of Silencing
Dotson, K. (2011) · Hypatia · doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.2011.01177.x · Cited by 2,150 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Standpoint Epistemology and Epistemic Peerhood: A Defense of Epistemic Privilege
TOOLE, B. (2024) · Journal of the American Philosophical Association · doi:10.1017/apa.2023.6 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
- Authors
- Saint-Croix, C.
- Corresponding author
- Saint-Croix, Catharine
- Venue
- Res Philosophica
- Publisher
- Philosophy Documentation Center
- Published
- 2020
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 489-524
- ISSN
- 2168-9105 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3093546571
- Cited by
- 27
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 0.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Res Philosophica (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
- Keywords
- epistemic privilege, standpoint theory, standpoint epistemology, social status, epistemic injustice, feminist epistemology, neighborhood semantics, modal logic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review