Cited by 27Feminist Epistemology and Gender StudiesEpistemology, Ethics, and MetaphysicsEducational Strategies and Epistemologies

Privilege and Position

Saint-Croix, Catharine·2020·Res Philosophica

Abstract

How does being a woman affect one’s epistemic life? What about being Black? Or queer? Standpoint theorists argue that such social positions can give rise to otherwise unavailable epistemic privilege. “Epistemic privilege” is a murky concept, however. Critics of standpoint theory argue that the view is offered without a clear explanation of how standpoints confer their benefits, what those benefits are, or why social positions are particularly apt to produce them. For this reason, many regard standpoint theory as being out of step with epistemology more broadly. But this need not be so. This article articulates a minimal version of standpoint epistemology that avoids these criticisms and supports the normative goals of its feminist forerunners. This account serves as the foundation for developing a formal model in which to explore standpoint epistemology using neighborhood semantics for modal logic.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.11612/resphil.1953

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Being oppressed is a necessary condition for having some of the experiences that are epistemically advantageous, but it is not a sufficient condition for occupying an epistemically privileged standpoint.

    “While being oppressed is a necessary condition for having some of the experiences that are epistemically advantageous (in that they increase one's evidential base), it is not a sufficient condition for occupying an epistemically privileged standpoint, any more than 'being employed as an oncologist' is a sufficient condition for expert status”

    From Standpoint Epistemology and Epistemic Peerhood: A Defense of Epistemic Privilege (2024) · cites this paper as Saint-Croix 2020: 492

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Saint-Croix, C.
Corresponding author
Saint-Croix, Catharine
Venue
Res Philosophica
Published
2020
Volume
97
Issue
4
Pages
489-524
ISSN
2168-9105 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3093546571
Cited by
27
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 1
FWCI
0.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Res Philosophica (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
Keywords
epistemic privilege, standpoint theory, standpoint epistemology, social status, epistemic injustice, feminist epistemology, neighborhood semantics, modal logic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review