Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 613

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Observational and interventional study design types; an overview

Open access
Thiese, Matthew S.·2014·Biochemia Medica

Abstract

The appropriate choice in study design is essential for the successful execution of biomedical and public health research.There are many study designs to choose from within two broad categories of observational and interventional studies.Each design has its own strengths and weaknesses, and the need to understand these limitations is necessary to arrive at correct study conclusions.Observational study designs, also called epidemiologic study designs, are often retrospective and are used to assess potential causation in exposure-outcome relationships and therefore influence preventive methods.Observational study designs include ecological designs, cross sectional, case-control, case-crossover, retrospective and prospective cohorts.An important subset of observational studies is diagnostic study designs, which evaluate the accuracy of diagnostic procedures and tests as compared to other diagnostic measures.These include diagnostic accuracy designs, diagnostic cohort designs, and diagnostic randomized controlled trials.Interventional studies are often prospective and are specifically tailored to evaluate direct impacts of treatment or preventive measures on disease.Each study design has specific outcome measures that rely on the type and quality of data utilized.Additionally, each study design has potential limitations that are more severe and need to be addressed in the design phase of the study.This manuscript is meant to provide an overview of study design types, strengths and weaknesses of common observational and interventional study designs.Key words: study design; epidemiology; observational study; randomized trials; study strengths and weaknesses statistical comparison made between groups to assess potential relationships between the exposure and outcome, all of which are defined by the researcher (1-4,8,13).The measure of exposure in epidemiologic studies may be tobacco use ("Yes" vs. "No") to define the two groups and may be the treatment (Active drug vs. placebo) in interventional studies.Health outcome(s) can be the development of a disease or symptom (e.g.lung cancer) or curing a disease or symptom (e.g.reduction of pain).Descriptive studies, which are not epidemio-

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.11613/bm.2014.022

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Cited by

See all 613

Metadata

Authors
Thiese, M. S.
Venue
Biochemia Medica
Published
2014
Volume
24
Issue
2
Pages
199-210
ISSN
  • 1330-0962 (ISSN-L)
  • 1846-7482
OpenAlex
W2126130217
Cited by
613
References
7
FWCI
13.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
diamond

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Observational and interventional study design types; an overview. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.11613/bm.2014.022
The paper
Thiese, M. S. (2014). Observational and interventional study design types; an overview. Biochemia Medica. https://doi.org/10.11613/bm.2014.022

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.