The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Territorial Integrity Norm: International Boundaries and the Use of Force
Abstract
Scholars and observers of the international system often comment on the decreasing importance of international boundaries as a result of the growth of international economic and social exchanges, economic liberalization, and international regimes. They generally fail to note, however, that coercive territorial revisionism has markedly declined over the past half century—a phenomenon that indicates that in certain ways states attach greater importance to boundaries in our present era. In this article I first trace states' beliefs and practices concerning the use of force to alter boundaries from the birth of the Westphalian order in the seventeenth century through the end of World War II. I then focus on the increasing acceptance of the norm against coercive territorial revisionism since 1945. Finally, I analyze those instrumental and ideational factors that have influenced the strengthening of the norm among both Western and developing countries.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
International Norm Dynamics and Political Change
Finnemore, M., & Sikkink, K. (1998) · International Organization · doi:10.1162/002081898550789 · Cited by 8,292
War and Change in World Politics
Gilpin, R. (1981) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511664267 · Cited by 4,020
Bull, H. (2012) · doi:10.1007/978-0-230-39340-0 · Cited by 3,316
Bull, H. (1977) · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-24028-9 · Cited by 3,316
Global Prohibition Regimes: the Evolution of Norms in International Society
Nadelmann, E. A. (1990) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s0020818300035384 · Cited by 989
Cited by
Inequality, Grievances, and Civil War
Cederman, L.-E., Gleditsch, K. S., & Buhaug, H. (2013) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139084161 · Cited by 978
Norm Subsidiarity and Regional Orders: Sovereignty, Regionalism, and Rule-Making in the Third World1
Acharya, A. (2011) · International Studies Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2478.2010.00637.x · Cited by 422
A cultural theory of international relations
(2009) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.47-2254 · Cited by 379
Bones of Contention: Comparing Territorial, Maritime, and River Issues
Hensel, P. R., McLaughlin Mitchell, S., Sowers, T. E., & Thyne, C. L. (2008) · Journal of Conflict Resolution · doi:10.1177/0022002707310425 · Cited by 317
Metadata
- Authors
- Zacher, M. W.
- Venue
- International Organization
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2001
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 215-250
- ISSN
- 0020-8183 (ISSN-L)
- 1531-5088
- OpenAlex
- W2102949004
- Cited by
- 664
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 115.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Territorial Integrity Norm: International Boundaries and the Use of Force. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1162/00208180151140568
- The paper
- Zacher, M. W. (2001). The Territorial Integrity Norm: International Boundaries and the Use of Force. International Organization. https://doi.org/10.1162/00208180151140568
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.