Cited by 995

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Competition and Innovation: An Inverted-U Relationship*

Aghion, Philippe, Bloom, Nick, Blundell, Richard, Griffith, Rachel, Howitt, Peter·2005·Quarterly Journal of Economics

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/0033553053970214

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. Aghion, Philippe, Nick Bloom, Richard Blundell, Rachel Griffith, and Peter Howitt, "Competition and Innovation: An Inverted-U Relationship?" UCL Working Paper No. 04/06, July 2004. · DOI
  2. 10.1111/1467-937X.00110 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/S0014-2921(97)00036-6 · DOI
  4. 10.1111/1467-937X.00177 · DOI
  5. 10.2307/2951599 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1111/1468-0262.00470 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Arrow, Kenneth, "Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention," in R. Nelson, ed., The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1962), pp. 609 - 625. · DOI
  8. 10.1111/1468-0297.00022 · DOI
  9. Blundell Richard, 1999, Review of Economic Studies, 554
  10. Blundell, Richard, and James Powell, "Endogeneity in Nonparametric and Semiparametric Regression Models," Chapter 8 in M. Dewatripont, L. P. Hansen, eds., Advances in Economics and Econometrics, Vol. II, Econometric Monograph Series 36 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).
  11. Dixit Avinash, 1977, American Economic Review, 297
  12. Geroski, Paul, Market Structure, Corporate Performance and Innovative Activity (Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 1995). · DOI
  13. Gilbert Richard, 1982, American Economic Review, 526
  14. Grossman, Gene, and Elhanan Helpman, Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1991).
  15. Hall, Bronwyn, Adam Jaffe, and Manuel Trajtenberg, "Market Value and Patent Citations: A First Look," NBER working paper No. 7741, June 2000. · DOI
  16. Hart Oliver, 1983, Bell Journal of Economics, 382
  17. Hausman Jerry, 1984, Econometrica, 938
  18. Martins Joaquim Oliveira, 1996, OECD Working Paper No., 162
  19. Nickell Steven, 1996, Journal of Political Economy, 746
  20. Reinganum Jennifer, 1983, American Economic Review, 61
  21. 10.1086/261725 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Salop Steven, 1977, Review of Economic Studies, 393, 10.2307/2296898 · DOI
  23. 10.2307/2555404 · DOI
  24. Scherer Fredrick, 1967, American Economic Review, 531
  25. Schmidt Klaus, 1997, Review of Economic Studies, 191, 10.2307/2971709 · DOI
  26. Sutton, John, Technology and Market Structure (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1998).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 995

Metadata

Authors
Aghion, P., Bloom, N., Blundell, R., Griffith, R., & Howitt, P.
Venue
Quarterly Journal of Economics
Published
2005-05
Volume
120
Issue
2
Pages
701-728
ISSN
  • 0033-5533
  • 1531-4650
Cited by
995
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review