Cited by 555Corruption and Economic DevelopmentLabor market dynamics and wage inequalityEconomic Growth and Productivity

Democracies Pay Higher Wages

Rodrik, D.·1999·The Quarterly Journal of Economics

Abstract

Controlling for labor productivity, income levels, and other possible determinants, there is a robust and statistically significant association between the extent of democracy and the level of manufacturing wages in a country. The association exists both across countries and over time within countries. The coefficient estimates suggest that nonnegligible wage improvements result from the enhancement of democratic institutions: average wages in a country like Mexico would be expected to increase by 10 to 40 percent if Mexico were to attain a level of democracy comparable to that prevailing in the United States. Political competition and participation seem to be the driving force behind the result.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/003355399556115

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The model developed in the paper is similar in spirit to the regression model used by Dani Rodrik to investigate the effect of democracy on wages.

    “The model developed below is similar in spirit to the regression model used by Dani Rodrik to investigate the effect of democracy on wages (Rodrik 1999).”

    From Modeling Social Pressures Toward Political Instability (2013) · cites this paper as Rodrik 1999

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Belsley, D.A., E. Kuh, and R.E. Welsch, Regression Diagnostics, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1980.
  2. Helliwell, John, "Empirical Linkages Between Democracy and Economic Growth," British Journal of Political Science 24, 1994, 225-248

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rodrik, D.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Rodrik, D.
Venue
The Quarterly Journal of Economics
Published
1999-08-01
Volume
114
Issue
3
Pages
707-738
ISSN
  • 0033-5533 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-4650
OpenAlex
W2892139511
Cited by
555
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 21
FWCI
77.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Quarterly Journal of Economics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique) (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Corruption and Economic Development
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Growth and Productivity
Keywords
democracy, wages, manufacturing wages, political competition, political participation, democratic institutions, labor productivity, income level, cross-national comparison, within-country variation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review