The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Intranational Home Bias in Trade
Abstract
A number of recent studies have found intranational trade to be excessive compared to international trade, based on a gravity specification. The preferred explanation for this finding has been the presence of formal and informal trade barriers, with associated welfare consequences. If such barriers were indeed the sole culprit, home bias should not exist on the subnational level. We find, however, that home bias is present within U.S. states, suggesting the presence of other causes of excessive home trade.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Anderson, J. E., & van Wincoop, E. (2004) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/0022051042177649 · Cited by 2,524
Home Bias in Online Investments: An Empirical Study of an Online Crowdfunding Market
Lin, M., & Viswanathan, S. (2016) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2015.2206 · Cited by 678
A Fragmented China: Measure and Determinants of Chinese Domestic Market Disintegration
Poncet, S. (2005) · Review of International Economics · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9396.2005.00514.x · Cited by 462
Regional wage and employment responses to market potential in the EU
Head, K., & Mayer, T. (2006) · Regional Science and Urban Economics · doi:10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2006.06.002 · Cited by 256
Cross-border electronic commerce: distance effects and express delivery in European union markets
Kim, T. Y., Dekker, R., & Heij, C. (2017) · International Journal of Electronic Commerce · doi:10.1080/10864415.2016.1234283 · Cited by 203
Metadata
- Authors
- Wolf, H. C.
- Venue
- Review of Economics and Statistics
- Publisher
- MIT Press - Journals
- Published
- 2000-11
- Volume
- 82
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 555-563
- ISSN
- 0034-6535 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-9142
- OpenAlex
- W1966311744
- Cited by
- 426
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intranational Home Bias in Trade. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1162/003465300559046
- The paper
- Wolf, H. C. (2000). Intranational Home Bias in Trade. Review of Economics and Statistics. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465300559046
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
