Human Security: Paradigm Shift or Hot Air?
Abstract
International Security - Volume 26, Number 2, Fall 2001
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cites
Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics
Sartori, G. (1970) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/1958356 · Cited by 3,318 · see citing works
Mathews, J. T. (1989) · Foreign Affairs · doi:10.2307/20043906 · Cited by 494 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Climate and Security: Evidence, Emerging Risks, and a New Agenda
Gemenne, F., Barnett, J., Adger, W. N., & Dabelko, G. D. (2014) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-014-1074-7 · Cited by 158 · see citing works
Okafor-Yarwood, I. (2020) · African Security · doi:10.1080/19392206.2020.1724432 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
- Authors
- Paris, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Colorado Boulder (US)
- Corresponding author
- Paris, Roland
- Venue
- International Security
- Publisher
- MIT Press
- Published
- 2001-10
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 87-102
- ISSN
- 0162-2889 (ISSN-L)
- 1531-4804
- OpenAlex
- W2129755491
- Cited by
- 1,101
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 50 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 56 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 65 · 2021: 71 · 2020: 72 · 2019: 83 · 2018: 54 · 2017: 50 · 2016: 47 · 2015: 40 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 58 · 2012: 54
- FWCI
- 94.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Security (publishedVersion)
- Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Global Peace and Security Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Peacebuilding and International Security
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Global Security and Public Health
- Keywords
- human security, paradigm shift, security concepts, international security theory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
