The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Getting Asia Wrong: The Need for New Analytical Frameworks
Abstract
April 01 2003 Getting Asia Wrong: The Need for New Analytical Frameworks David C. Kang David C. Kang Associate Professor of Government and Adjunct Associate Professor at the Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth College. Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Author and Article Information David C. Kang Associate Professor of Government and Adjunct Associate Professor at the Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth College. Online ISSN: 1531-4804 Print ISSN: 0162-2889 © 2003 by the President and Fellows of Harvard College and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology2003 International Security (2003) 27 (4): 57–85. https://doi.org/10.1162/016228803321951090 Cite Icon Cite Permissions Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Search Site Citation David C. Kang; Getting Asia Wrong: The Need for New Analytical Frameworks. International Security 2003; 27 (4): 57–85. doi: https://doi.org/10.1162/016228803321951090 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentAll JournalsInternational Security Search Advanced Search © 2003 by the President and Fellows of Harvard College and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology2003 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of Government in East Asian Industrialization
Wade, R. (1990) · doi:10.1515/9780691187181 · Cited by 4,835
Cooperation under the security dilemma
Jervis, R. (1978) · World Politics · doi:10.2307/2009958 · Cited by 2,305
Cited by
A cultural theory of international relations
(2009) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.47-2254 · Cited by 379
The Making of Global International Relations: Origins and Evolution of IR at its Centenary
Acharya, A., & Buzan, B. (2019) · doi:10.1017/9781108647670 · Cited by 375
Why is there no non-Western international relations theory? An introduction
Acharya, A., & Buzan, B. (2007) · International Relations of the Asia-Pacific · doi:10.1093/irap/lcm012 · Cited by 355
The Emerging Regional Architecture of World Politics
Acharya, A. (2007) · World Politics · doi:10.1353/wp.2008.0000 · Cited by 294
What (If Anything) Does East Asia Tell Us About International Relations Theory?
Johnston, A. I. (2012) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.040908.120058 · Cited by 115
Metadata
- Authors
- Kang, D. C.
- Venue
- International Security
- Publisher
- MIT Press - Journals
- Published
- 2003-04
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 57-85
- ISSN
- 0162-2889 (ISSN-L)
- 1531-4804
- OpenAlex
- W2054717228
- Cited by
- 497
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 84.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Getting Asia Wrong: The Need for New Analytical Frameworks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1162/016228803321951090
- The paper
- Kang, D. C. (2003). Getting Asia Wrong: The Need for New Analytical Frameworks. International Security. https://doi.org/10.1162/016228803321951090
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.