Human Dignity and Human Rights: Thoughts on the Principles of Human-Centered Design
Abstract
July 01 2001 Human Dignity and Human Rights: Thoughts on the Principles of Human-Centered Design Richard Buchanan Richard Buchanan Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Author and Article Information Richard Buchanan Online Issn: 1531-4790 Print Issn: 0747-9360 © 2001 Massachusetts Institute of Technology2001 Design Issues (2001) 17 (3): 35–39. https://doi.org/10.1162/074793601750357178 Cite Icon Cite Permissions Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Search Site Citation Richard Buchanan; Human Dignity and Human Rights: Thoughts on the Principles of Human-Centered Design. Design Issues 2001; 17 (3): 35–39. doi: https://doi.org/10.1162/074793601750357178 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentAll JournalsDesign Issues Search Advanced Search This content is only available as a PDF. © 2001 Massachusetts Institute of Technology2001 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Co-design and participatory design have been marginally used within HRI due to lack of methodologies and robot platforms suited for exploring robot design in the target social context to support experience-based exploration.
“Despite these benefits, co-design and participatory design have been marginally used within HRI [8] due to lack of methodologies and robot platforms suited for exploring robot design in the target social context to support experiencebased exploration.”
From Long-Term Co-Design Guidelines: Empowering Older Adults as Co-Designers of Social Robots (2021) · cites this paper as [8]
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- 2000, held in Cape Town from June, 22, 24
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Human-centered design for global health equity
Holeman, I., & Kane, D. (2020) · Information Technology for Development · doi:10.1080/02681102.2019.1667289 · Cited by 285 · see citing works
Björling, E. A., & Rose, E. (2019) · Multimodal Technologies and Interaction · doi:10.3390/mti3010008 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
Long-Term Co-Design Guidelines: Empowering Older Adults as Co-Designers of Social Robots
Ostrowski, A. K., Breazeal, C., & Park, H. W. (2021) · 2021 30th IEEE International Conference on Robot & Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN) · doi:10.1109/ro-man50785.2021.9515559 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
“HCD as an approach expands past limiting participants’ role as informants and aims to uphold them as the main contributors of the process, embracing human dignity [17].”
Background
- Authors
- Buchanan, R.
- Corresponding author
- Buchanan, Richard
- Venue
- Design Issues
- Publisher
- MIT Press - Journals
- Published
- 2001-07
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 35-39
- ISSN
- 0747-9360 (ISSN-L)
- 1531-4790
- OpenAlex
- W2057132183
- Cited by
- 285
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 4.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Design Issues (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Design Education and Practice
- Social Sciences › Law › Legal Rights and Human Rights
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Ergonomics and Human Factors
- Keywords
- human dignity, human rights, human-centered design, design ethics, design principles
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
