The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Brain Indices of Music Processing: “Nonmusicians” are Musical
Abstract
Only little systematic research has examined event-related brain potentials (ERPs) elicited by the cognitive processing of music. The present study investigated how music processing is influenced by a preceding musical context, affected by the task relevance of unexpected chords, and influenced by the degree and the probability of violation. Four experiments were conducted in which “nonmusicians” listened to chord sequences, which infrequently contained a chord violating the sound expectancy of listeners. Integration of in-key chords into the musical context was reflected as a late negative-frontal deflection in the ERPs. This negative deflection declined towards the end of a chord sequence, reflecting normal buildup of musical context. Brain waves elicited by chords with unexpected notes revealed two ERP effects: an early right-hemispheric preponderant-anterior negativity, which was taken to reflect the violation of sound expectancy; and a late bilateral-frontal negativity. The late negativity was larger compared to in-key chords and taken to reflect the higher degree of integration needed for unexpected chords. The early right-anterior negativity (ERAN) was unaffected by the task relevance of unexpected chords. The amplitudes of both early and late negativities were found to be sensitive to the degree of musical expectancy induced by the preceding harmonic context, and to the probability for deviant acoustic events. The employed experimental design opens a new field for the investigation of music processing. Results strengthen the hypothesis of an implicit musical ability of the human brain.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Reaction time and musical expectancy: Priming of chords.
Bharucha, J. J., & Stoeckig, K. (1986) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance · doi:10.1037//0096-1523.12.4.403 · Cited by 351
Cited by
The mismatch negativity (MMN) in basic research of central auditory processing: A review
Näätänen, R., Paavilainen, P., Rinne, T., & Alho, K. (2007) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2007.04.026 · Cited by 2,644
Emotional responses to music: The need to consider underlying mechanisms
Juslin, P. N., & Västfjäll, D. (2008) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x08005293 · Cited by 1,914
Stevens' Handbook of Experimental Psychology
(2002) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/0471214426 · Cited by 1,632
Müllensiefen, D., Gingras, B., Musil, J., & Stewart, L. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0089642 · Cited by 1,155
Musical syntax is processed in Broca's area: an MEG study
Maess, B., Koelsch, S., Gunter, T. C., & Friederici, A. D. (2001) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/87502 · Cited by 968
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Koelsch, S., Gunter, T., Friederici, A. D., & Schröger, E.
- Venue
- Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
- Publisher
- MIT Press
- Published
- 2000-05-01
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 520-541
- ISSN
- 0898-929X (ISSN-L)
- 1530-8898
- OpenAlex
- W2143884780
- Cited by
- 550
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Brain Indices of Music Processing: “Nonmusicians” are Musical. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1162/089892900562183
- The paper
- Koelsch, S., Gunter, T., Friederici, A. D., & Schröger, E. (2000). Brain Indices of Music Processing: “Nonmusicians” are Musical. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1162/089892900562183
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.