The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Grammatical Distinctions in the Left Frontal Cortex
Open accessAbstract
Selective deficits in producing verbs relative to nouns in speech are well documented in neuropsychology and have been associated with left hemisphere frontal cortical lesions resulting from stroke and other neurological disorders. The basis for these impairments is unresolved: Do they arise because of differences in the way grammatical categories of words are organized in the brain, or because of differences in the neural representation of actions and objects? We used repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to suppress the excitability of a portion of left prefrontal cortex and to assess its role in producing nouns and verbs. In one experiment subjects generated real words; in a second, they produced pseudowords as nouns or verbs. In both experiments, response latencies increased for verbs but were unaffected for nouns following rTMS. These results demonstrate that grammatical categories have a neuroanatomical basis and that the left prefrontal cortex is selectively engaged in processing verbs as grammatical objects.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Depression of motor cortex excitability by low-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation
Chen, R., Classen, J., Gerloff, C., Celnik, P., Wassermann, E. M., Hallett, M., & Cohen, L. G. (1997) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.48.5.1398 · Cited by 2,128 · cited 5×
“For the purposes of the present experiment, however, functional resolution is the critical variable (Mottaghy et al., in press; Kosslyn et al., 1999; Siebner et al., 1998; Chen et al., 1997).”
BackgroundInfluentialPractice-related Changes in Human Brain Functional Anatomy during Nonmotor Learning
Raichle, M. E., Fiez, J. A., Videen, T. O., MacLeod, A.-M. K., Pardo, J. V., Fox, P. T., & Petersen, S. E. (1994) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/4.1.8 · Cited by 1,593
Pulvermüller, F. (1999) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x9900182x · Cited by 1,284
Pascual-Leone, A. (2000) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/s0959-4388(00)00081-7 · Cited by 923
Transcranial magnetic stimulation and cognitive neuroscience
Walsh, V., & Cowey, A. (2000) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/35036239 · Cited by 814 · cited 2×
“The resultant magnetic fields pass unattenuated through the scalp and skull, inducing a current in the underlying brain tissue (Walsh & Cowey, 2000).”
Background
Cited by
The faculty of language: what's special about it?
Pinker, S., & Jackendoff, R. (2005) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2004.08.004 · Cited by 631
Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D. P., Druks, J., Barber, H., & Cappa, S. F. (2011) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.04.007 · Cited by 594
Action Naming in Spanish and English by Sequential Bilingual Children and Adolescents
(2006) · doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2006/042
Metadata
- Authors
- Shapiro, K. A., Pascual-Leone, A., Mottaghy, F. M., Gangitano, M., & Caramazza, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
- Publisher
- MIT Press - Journals
- Published
- 2001-08
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 713-720
- ISSN
- 0898-929X (ISSN-L)
- 1530-8898
- OpenAlex
- W2162380942
- Cited by
- 179
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 5.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Grammatical Distinctions in the Left Frontal Cortex. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1162/08989290152541386
- The paper
- Shapiro, K. A., Pascual-Leone, A., Mottaghy, F. M., Gangitano, M., & Caramazza, A. (2001). Grammatical Distinctions in the Left Frontal Cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1162/08989290152541386
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.