Cited by 923Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications

Transcranial magnetic stimulation in cognitive neuroscience–virtual lesion, chronometry, and functional connectivity

Pascual-Leone, A·2000·Current Opinion in Neurobiology

Abstract

Fifteen years after its introduction by Anthony Barker, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) appears to be 'coming of age' in cognitive neuroscience and promises to reshape the way we investigate brain-behavior relations. Among the many methods now available for imaging the activity of the human brain, magnetic stimulation is the only technique that allows us to interfere actively with brain function. As illustrated by several experiments over the past couple of years, this property of TMS allows us to investigate the relationship between focal cortical activity and behavior, to trace the timing at which activity in a particular cortical region contributes to a given task, and to map the functional connectivity between brain regions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0959-4388(00)00081-7

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • TMS has a variety of cognitive and therapeutic effects.

    “TMS has been shown to have a variety of cognitive [63] and therapeutic [64] effects.”

    From The electromagnetic will (2021) · cites this paper as [63]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pascual-Leone, A.
Venue
Current Opinion in Neurobiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-04-01
Volume
10
Issue
2
Pages
232-237
ISSN
0959-4388 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1995412600
Cited by
923
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 84 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 53 · 2012: 40
FWCI
3.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Neurobiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01 MH60734, R01MH060734, R01MH57980, R01MH057980)
  • National Center for Research Resources (M01RR001032, MO1-RR01032)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
Keywords
transcranial magnetic stimulation, virtual lesion, chronometry, functional connectivity, brain-behavior relationship, human brain function
MeSH terms
Behavior, Mental Disorders, Brain, Brain Diseases, Chronobiology Phenomena, Cognition, Electric Stimulation, Electromagnetic Fields, Humans, Functional Laterality, Neurosciences, Physical Stimulation, Reaction Time, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review