The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Parietal Representation of Symbolic and Nonsymbolic Magnitude
Abstract
The close behavioral parallels between the processing of quantitative information conveyed by symbolic and non-symbolic stimuli led to the hypothesis that there exists a common cerebral representation of quantity (Dehaene, Dehaene-Lambertz, & Cohen, 1998). The neural basis underlying the encoding of number magnitude has been localized to regions in and around the intraparietal sulcus (IPS) by brain-imaging studies. However, it has never been demonstrated that these same regions are also involved in the quantitative processing of nonsymbolic stimuli. Using functional brain imaging, we explicitly tested the hypothesis of a common substrate. Angles, lines, and two-digit numbers were presented pairwise, one to the left and one to the right of the fixation point. In the three comparison tasks, participants (n = 18) pressed the key on the side of the largest quantity. In the three control tasks, they indicated the side on which dimming occurred. A conjunction analysis between the three subtractions (comparison task-control task) revealed a site in left IPS that is specifically responsive when two stimuli have to be compared quantitatively, irrespective of stimulus format. The results confirm the hypothesis that quantity is represented by a common mechanism for both symbolic and nonsymbolic stimuli in IPS. In addition, the interaction between task and type of stimulus identified a region anterior to the conjunction site, not specific for quantitative processing, but reflecting general processes loaded by number processing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information
Maes, F., Collignon, A., Vandermeulen, D., Marchal, G., & Suetens, P. (1997) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/42.563664 · Cited by 4,547
Time required for Judgements of Numerical Inequality
MOYER, R. S., & LANDAUER, T. K. (1967) · Nature · doi:10.1038/2151519a0 · Cited by 2,068
Cited by
A theory of magnitude: common cortical metrics of time, space and quantity
Walsh, V (2003) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2003.09.002 · Cited by 2,042
Interactions between number and space in parietal cortex
Hubbard, E. M., Piazza, M., Pinel, P., & Dehaene, S. (2005) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1684 · Cited by 1,247
Representation of Number in the Brain
Nieder, A., & Dehaene, S. (2009) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.051508.135550 · Cited by 847
Pinel, P., Piazza, M., Le Bihan, D., & Dehaene, S. (2004) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(04)00107-2 · Cited by 695
Representation of Number in Animals and Humans: A Neural Model
Verguts, T., & Fias, W. (2004) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/0898929042568497 · Cited by 454
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Fias, W., Lammertyn, J., Reynvoet, B., Dupont, P., & Orban, G. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
- Publisher
- MIT Press - Journals
- Published
- 2003-01-01
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 47-56
- ISSN
- 0898-929X (ISSN-L)
- 1530-8898
- OpenAlex
- W2064716935
- Cited by
- 418
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 20.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Parietal Representation of Symbolic and Nonsymbolic Magnitude. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1162/089892903321107819
- The paper
- Fias, W., Lammertyn, J., Reynvoet, B., Dupont, P., & Orban, G. A. (2003). Parietal Representation of Symbolic and Nonsymbolic Magnitude. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1162/089892903321107819
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.