The DOI matches its Crossref record; 81 of the 81 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparing the Effects of Auditory Deprivation and Sign Language within the Auditory and Visual Cortex
Abstract
To investigate neural plasticity resulting from early auditory deprivation and use of American Sign Language, we measured responses to visual stimuli in deaf signers, hearing signers, and hearing nonsigners using functional magnetic resonance imaging. We examined “compensatory hypertrophy” (changes in the responsivity/size of visual cortical areas) and “cross-modal plasticity” (changes in auditory cortex responses to visual stimuli). We measured the volume of early visual areas (V1, V2, V3, V4, and MT+). We also measured the amplitude of responses within these areas, and within the auditory cortex, to a peripheral visual motion stimulus that was attended or ignored. We found no major differences between deaf and hearing subjects in the size or responsivity of early visual areas. In contrast, within the auditory cortex, motion stimuli evoked significant responses in deaf subjects, but not in hearing subjects, in a region of the right auditory cortex corresponding to Brodmann's areas 41, 42, and 22. This hemispheric selectivity may be due to a predisposition for the right auditory cortex to process motion; earlier studies report a right hemisphere bias for auditory motion in hearing subjects. Visual responses within the auditory cortex of deaf subjects were stronger for attended than ignored stimuli, suggesting top-down processes. Hearing signers did not show visual responses in the auditory cortex, indicating that cross-modal plasticity can be attributed to auditory deprivation rather than sign language experience. The largest effects of auditory deprivation occurred within the auditory cortex rather than the visual cortex, suggesting that the absence of normal input is necessary for large-scale cortical reorganization to occur.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain
Talairach, J., & Tournoux, P. (1988) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 11,798
AFNI: Software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages
Cox, R. W. (1996) · Computers and Biomedical Research · doi:10.1006/cbmr.1996.0014 · Cited by 10,913
Linear Systems Analysis of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Human V1
Boynton, G. M., Engel, S. A., Glover, G. H., & Heeger, D. J. (1996) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.16-13-04207.1996 · Cited by 2,314
Self-citationRetinotopic organization in human visual cortex and the spatial precision of functional MRI
Engel, S. (1997) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/7.2.181 · Cited by 1,621
Functional analysis of human MT and related visual cortical areas using magnetic resonance imaging
Tootell, R., Reppas, J., Kwong, K., Malach, R., Born, R., Brady, T., Rosen, B., & Belliveau, J. (1995) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.15-04-03215.1995 · Cited by 1,415
Watson, J. D. G., Myers, R., Frackowiak, R. S. J., Hajnal, J. V., Woods, R. P., Mazziotta, J. C., Shipp, S., & Zeki, S. (1993) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/3.2.79 · Cited by 1,234
Mapping striate and extrastriate visual areas in human cerebral cortex.
DeYoe, E. A., Carman, G. J., Bandettini, P., Glickman, S., Wieser, J., Cox, R., Miller, D., & Neitz, J. (1996) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.93.6.2382 · Cited by 1,046
Cross-modal plasticity: where and how?
Bavelier, D., & Neville, H. J. (2002) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn848 · Cited by 1,040
Activation of Auditory Cortex During Silent Lipreading
Calvert, G. A., Bullmore, E. T., Brammer, M. J., Campbell, R., Williams, S. C. R., McGuire, P. K., Woodruff, P. W. R., Iversen, S. D., & David, A. S. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.276.5312.593 · Cited by 1,025
Engel, S. A., Rumelhart, D. E., Wandell, B. A., Lee, A. T., Glover, G. H., Chichilnisky, E.-J., & Shadlen, M. N. (1994) · Nature · doi:10.1038/369525a0 · Cited by 990
Cited by
Neural reorganization following sensory loss: the opportunity of change
Merabet, L. B., & Pascual-Leone, A. (2010) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2758 · Cited by 751
Do deaf individuals see better?
Bavelier, D., Dye, M. W. G., & Hauser, P. C. (2006) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.09.006 · Cited by 506
Cortical development, plasticity and re-organization in children with cochlear implants
Sharma, A., Nash, A. A., & Dorman, M. (2009) · Journal of Communication Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jcomdis.2009.03.003 · Cited by 305
Metadata
- Authors
- Fine, I., Finney, E. M., Boynton, G. M., & Dobkins, K. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
- Publisher
- MIT Press - Journals
- Published
- 2005-10-01
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1621-1637
- ISSN
- 0898-929X (ISSN-L)
- 1530-8898
- OpenAlex
- W2109015013
- Cited by
- 255
- References
- 81
- FWCI
- 3.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparing the Effects of Auditory Deprivation and Sign Language within the Auditory and Visual Cortex. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1162/089892905774597173
- The paper
- Fine, I., Finney, E. M., Boynton, G. M., & Dobkins, K. R. (2005). Comparing the Effects of Auditory Deprivation and Sign Language within the Auditory and Visual Cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1162/089892905774597173
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.