The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Musician Children Detect Pitch Violations in Both Music and Language Better than Nonmusician Children: Behavioral and Electrophysiological Approaches
Open accessAbstract
The idea that extensive musical training can influence processing in cognitive domains other than music has received considerable attention from the educational system and the media. Here we analyzed behavioral data and recorded event-related brain potentials (ERPs) from 8-year-old children to test the hypothesis that musical training facilitates pitch processing not only in music but also in language. We used a parametric manipulation of pitch so that the final notes or words of musical phrases or sentences were congruous, weakly incongruous, or strongly incongruous. Musician children outperformed nonmusician children in the detection of the weak incongruity in both music and language. Moreover, the greatest differences in the ERPs of musician and nonmusician children were also found for the weak incongruity: whereas for musician children, early negative components developed in music and late positive components in language, no such components were found for nonmusician children. Finally, comparison of these results with previous ones from adults suggests that some aspects of pitch processing are in effect earlier in music than in language. Thus, the present results reveal positive transfer effects between cognitive domains and shed light on the time course and neural basis of the development of prosodic and melodic processing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating?
Donchin, E., & Coles, M. G. H. (1988) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00058027 · Cited by 3,585
Increased Cortical Representation of the Fingers of the Left Hand in String Players
Elbert, T., Pantev, C., Wienbruch, C., Rockstroh, B., & Taub, E. (1995) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.270.5234.305 · Cited by 2,054
The P300 wave of the human event-related potential
Picton, T. W. (1992) · Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1097/00004691-199210000-00002 · Cited by 1,908
Sources of Mathematical Thinking: Behavioral and Brain-Imaging Evidence
Dehaene, S., Spelke, E., Pinel, P., Stanescu, R., & Tsivkin, S. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.284.5416.970 · Cited by 1,739
Augmenting mental chronometry: The P300 as a measure of stimulus evaluation time
Kutas, M., McCarthy, G., & Donchin, E. (1977) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.887923 · Cited by 1,714
Brain Structures Differ between Musicians and Non-Musicians
Gaser, C., & Schlaug, G. (2003) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.23-27-09240.2003 · Cited by 1,633
Structure and function of auditory cortex: music and speech
Zatorre, R. J., Belin, P., & Penhune, V. B. (2002) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01816-7 · Cited by 1,586
Language, music, syntax and the brain
Patel, A. D. (2003) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1082 · Cited by 1,242
On Quantifying Surprise: The Variation of Event‐Related Potentials With Subjective Probability
Duncan‐Johnson, C. C., & Donchin, E. (1977) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1977.tb01312.x · Cited by 1,224
Schellenberg, E. G. (2004) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00711.x · Cited by 980
Cited by
Music training for the development of auditory skills
Kraus, N., & Chandrasekaran, B. (2010) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2882 · Cited by 1,115
Hallam, S. (2010) · International Journal of Music Education · doi:10.1177/0255761410370658 · Cited by 993
Musicians have enhanced subcortical auditory and audiovisual processing of speech and music
Musacchia, G., Sams, M., Skoe, E., & Kraus, N. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0701498104 · Cited by 678
Music acquisition: Effects of enculturation and formal training on development
Hannon, E. E., & Trainor, L. J. (2007) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2007.08.008 · Cited by 493
Influence of musical expertise and musical training on pitch processing in music and language
Besson, M., Schön, D., Moreno, S., Santos, A., & Magne, C. (2007) · Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience · doi:10.3233/rnn-2007-253423 · Cited by 285
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Magne, C., Schön, D., & Besson, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
- Publisher
- The MIT Press
- Published
- 2006-02-01
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 199-211
- ISSN
- 0898-929X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4250175684
- Cited by
- 404
- References
- 52
- FWCI
- 7.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Musician Children Detect Pitch Violations in Both Music and Language Better than Nonmusician Children: Behavioral and Electrophysiological Approaches. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1162/089892906775783660
- The paper
- Magne, C., Schön, D., & Besson, M. (2006). Musician Children Detect Pitch Violations in Both Music and Language Better than Nonmusician Children: Behavioral and Electrophysiological Approaches. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1162/089892906775783660
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.