Cited by 493Neuroscience and Music PerceptionDiverse Music Education InsightsMusic and Audio Processing

Music acquisition: Effects of enculturation and formal training on development

Hannon, Erin E., Trainor, Laurel J.·2007·Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Abstract

Musical structure is complex, consisting of a small set of elements that combine to form hierarchical levels of pitch and temporal structure according to grammatical rules. As with language, different systems use different elements and rules for combination. Drawing on recent findings, we propose that music acquisition begins with basic features, such as peripheral frequency-coding mechanisms and multisensory timing connections, and proceeds through enculturation, whereby everyday exposure to a particular music system creates, in a systematic order of acquisition, culture-specific brain structures and representations. Finally, we propose that formal musical training invokes domain-specific processes that affect salience of musical input and the amount of cortical tissue devoted to its processing, as well as domain-general processes of attention and executive functioning.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tics.2007.08.008

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Any benefit in attention and executive functions might indirectly influence performance in academic and cognitive activities, acting as a mediator between musical training and non-musical skills.

    “Therefore, any benefit in attention and executive functions might indirectly influence performance in those activities (i.e., acting as a mediator factor between musical training and non-musical skills; Hannon & Trainor, 2007;Moreno & Farzan, 2015;Román-Caballero et al., 2018).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hannon, E. E., & Trainor, L. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Nevada, Las Vegas (US)
  • McMaster University (CA)
Corresponding author
Hannon, Erin E.
Venue
Trends in Cognitive Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-11
Volume
11
Issue
11
Pages
466-472
ISSN
1364-6613 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2099932321
Cited by
493
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 46 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 37
FWCI
1.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Trends in Cognitive Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Music › Diverse Music Education Insights
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Music and Audio Processing
Keywords
music acquisition, enculturation, music cognition, musical structure, pitch processing, temporal processing, multisensory integration, cross-linguistic variation, domain-general processes, attention, executive function, cortical specialization
MeSH terms
Auditory Cortex, Culture, Education, Humans, Language Development, Learning, Music, Pitch Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review