The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Universal Model for Spike-Frequency Adaptation
Open accessAbstract
Spike-frequency adaptation is a prominent feature of neural dynamics. Among other mechanisms, various ionic currents modulating spike generation cause this type of neural adaptation. Prominent examples are voltage-gated potassium currents (M-type currents), the interplay of calcium currents and intracellular calcium dynamics with calcium-gated potassium channels (AHP-type currents), and the slow recovery from inactivation of the fast sodium current. While recent modeling studies have focused on the effects of specific adaptation currents, we derive a universal model for the firing-frequency dynamics of an adapting neuron that is independent of the specific adaptation process and spike generator. The model is completely defined by the neuron's onset f-I curve, the steady-state f-I curve, and the time constant of adaptation. For a specific neuron, these parameters can be easily determined from electrophysiological measurements without any pharmacological manipulations. At the same time, the simplicity of the model allows one to analyze mathematically how adaptation influences signal processing on the single-neuron level. In particular, we elucidate the specific nature of high-pass filter properties caused by spike-frequency adaptation. The model is limited to firing frequencies higher than the reciprocal adaptation time constant and to moderate fluctuations of the adaptation and the input current. As an extension of the model, we introduce a framework for combining an arbitrary spike generator with a generalized adaptation current.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Type I membranes, phase resetting curves, and synchrony
Ermentrout, B. (1996) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1996.8.5.979 · Cited by 1,001
Control of the repetitive discharge of rat CA 1 pyramidal neurones in vitro.
Madison, D. V., & Nicoll, R. A. (1984) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1984.sp015378 · Cited by 746
Synchrony in excitatory neural networks
Hansel, D., Mato, G., & Meunier, C. (1995) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1995.7.2.307 · Cited by 587
Ca2+ buffering and action potential-evoked Ca2+ signaling in dendrites of pyramidal neurons
Helmchen, F., Imoto, K., & Sakmann, B. (1996) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/s0006-3495(96)79653-4 · Cited by 559
Cited by
A Review of the Integrate-and-fire Neuron Model: I. Homogeneous Synaptic Input
Burkitt, A. N. (2006) · Biological Cybernetics · doi:10.1007/s00422-006-0068-6 · Cited by 1,208
Fractional differentiation by neocortical pyramidal neurons
Lundstrom, B. N., Higgs, M. H., Spain, W. J., & Fairhall, A. L. (2008) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.2212 · Cited by 678
Unique features of action potential initiation in cortical neurons
Naundorf, B., Wolf, F., & Volgushev, M. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04610 · Cited by 396
The Border Between Seeing and Thinking
Block, N. (2023) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197622223.001.0001 · Cited by 367
Song, H. F., Yang, G. R., & Wang, X.-J. (2016) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004792 · Cited by 281
Metadata
- Authors
- Benda, J., & Herz, A. V. M.
- Venue
- Neural Computation
- Publisher
- MIT Press - Journals
- Published
- 2003-11-01
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2523-2564
- ISSN
- 0899-7667 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-888X
- OpenAlex
- W2142329149
- Cited by
- 522
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 4.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Universal Model for Spike-Frequency Adaptation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1162/089976603322385063
- The paper
- Benda, J., & Herz, A. V. M. (2003). A Universal Model for Spike-Frequency Adaptation. Neural Computation. https://doi.org/10.1162/089976603322385063
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.