The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Probabilistic Interpretation of Population Codes
Open accessAbstract
We present a general encoding-decoding framework for interpreting the activity of a population of units. A standard population code interpretation method, the Poisson model, starts from a description as to how a single value of an underlying quantity can generate the activities of each unit in the population. In casting it in the encoding-decoding framework, we find that this model is too restrictive to describe fully the activities of units in population codes in higher processing areas, such as the medial temporal area. Under a more powerful model, the population activity can convey information not only about a single value of some quantity but also about its whole distribution, including its variance, and perhaps even the certainty the system has in the actual presence in the world of the entity generating this quantity. We propose a novel method for forming such probabilistic interpretations of population codes and compare it to the existing method.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“From this perspective, our neural recordings support the idea of a “Bayesian brain” (66) and a neural mechanism of decision making that does not flip into a fixed point or attractor state but instead approximates the formation of a probability distribution (41, 67).”
From Representation of Confidence Associated with a Decision by Neurons in the Parietal Cortex (2009) · cites this paper as [67]
In the citing paper
“LIP neurons are hypothesized to encode the attentional salience or expected value of a visual saccade target (52, 53, 63), but these concepts cannot explain the pattern of LIP activity in our experiment.”
From Representation of Confidence Associated with a Decision by Neurons in the Parietal Cortex (2009) · cites this paper as [63]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data Via the EM Algorithm
Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1977.tb01600.x · Cited by 50,444
The hippocampus as a spatial map. Preliminary evidence from unit activity in the freely-moving rat
O'Keefe, J., & Dostrovsky, J. (1971) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0006-8993(71)90358-1 · Cited by 6,151
Generalizing the Hough transform to detect arbitrary shapes
Ballard, D. H. (1981) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/0031-3203(81)90009-1 · Cited by 4,434
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (B)
Fildes, R. A. (1993) · International Journal of Forecasting · doi:10.1016/0169-2070(93)90088-5 · Cited by 3,462
Neuronal Population Coding of Movement Direction
Georgopoulos, A. P., Schwartz, A. B., & Kettner, R. E. (1986) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.3749885 · Cited by 3,219
Dynamics of the Hippocampal Ensemble Code for Space
Wilson, M. A., & McNaughton, B. L. (1993) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.8351520 · Cited by 2,350
Reliability of spike timing in neocortical neurons
Mainen, Z. F., & Sejnowski, T. J. (1995) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7770778 · Cited by 1,950
Encoding of Spatial Location by Posterior Parietal Neurons
Andersen, R., Essick, G. K., & Siegel, R. M. (1985) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.4048942 · Cited by 1,413
Noise, neural codes and cortical organization
Shadlen, M. N., & Newsome, W. T. (1994) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/0959-4388(94)90059-0 · Cited by 1,255
Correlated neuronal discharge rate and its implications for psychophysical performance
Zohary, E., Shadlen, M. N., & Newsome, W. T. (1994) · Nature · doi:10.1038/370140a0 · Cited by 1,237
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The free-energy principle: a unified brain theory?
Friston, K. (2010) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2787 · Cited by 8,120
The Bayesian brain: The role of uncertainty in neural coding and computation
Knill, D. C., & Pouget, A. (2004) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2004.10.007 · Cited by 2,588
Self-citationThe free-energy principle: a rough guide to the brain?
Friston, K. (2009) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2009.04.005 · Cited by 1,831
Bayesian inference with probabilistic population codes
Ma, W. J., Beck, J. M., Latham, P. E., & Pouget, A. (2006) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1790 · Cited by 1,457
Self-citationCausal Inference in Multisensory Perception
Körding, K. P., Beierholm, U., Ma, W. J., Quartz, S., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Shams, L. (2007) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000943 · Cited by 1,069
Metadata
- Authors
- Zemel, R. S., Dayan, P., & Pouget, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Arizona (US)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
- Georgetown University (US)
- Venue
- Neural Computation
- Publisher
- MIT Press
- Published
- 1998-02-01
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 403-430
- ISSN
- 0899-7667 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-888X
- OpenAlex
- W1985162039
- Cited by
- 333
- References
- 32
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 4.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Locations
- Neural Computation (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- James S. McDonnell Foundation
- Surdna Foundation
- National Institutes of Health (1r29mh055541-01)
- National Institute of Mental Health (R29 MH 55541-01)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
- Keywords
- population coding, probabilistic interpretation, Poisson model, population activity, medial temporal lobe, neural coding, uncertainty representation
- MeSH terms
- Data Interpretation, Statistical, Models, Neurological, Neurons, Probability, Models, Statistical, Poisson Distribution
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
