The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mixtures of Probabilistic Principal Component Analyzers
Abstract
Principal component analysis (PCA) is one of the most popular techniques for processing, compressing, and visualizing data, although its effectiveness is limited by its global linearity. While nonlinear variants of PCA have been proposed, an alternative paradigm is to capture data complexity by a combination of local linear PCA projections. However, conventional PCA does not correspond to a probability density, and so there is no unique way to combine PCA models. Therefore, previous attempts to formulate mixture models for PCA have been ad hoc to some extent. In this article, PCA is formulated within a maximum likelihood framework, based on a specific form of gaussian latent variable model. This leads to a well-defined mixture model for probabilistic principal component analyzers, whose parameters can be determined using an expectation-maximization algorithm. We discuss the advantages of this model in the context of clustering, density modeling, and local dimensionality reduction, and we demonstrate its application to image compression and handwritten digit recognition.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data Via the EM Algorithm
Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1977.tb01600.x · Cited by 50,444
Cited by
Investigations into resting-state connectivity using independent component analysis
Beckmann, C. F., DeLuca, M., Devlin, J. T., & Smith, S. M. (2005) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2005.1634 · Cited by 3,398
(2003) · Cited by 1,680
Multilinear Analysis of Image Ensembles: TensorFaces
Vasilescu, M. A. O., & Terzopoulos, D. (2002) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-47969-4_30 · Cited by 836
A tutorial on task-parameterized movement learning and retrieval
Calinon, S. (2016) · Intelligent Service Robotics · doi:10.1007/s11370-015-0187-9 · Cited by 422
High-dimensional data clustering
Bouveyron, C., Girard, S., & Schmid, C. (2007) · Computational Statistics & Data Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.csda.2007.02.009 · Cited by 382
Metadata
- Authors
- Tipping, M. E., & Bishop, C. M.
- Venue
- Neural Computation
- Publisher
- MIT Press
- Published
- 1999-02-01
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 443-482
- ISSN
- 0899-7667 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-888X
- OpenAlex
- W2146610201
- Cited by
- 1,873
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 54.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mixtures of Probabilistic Principal Component Analyzers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1162/089976699300016728
- The paper
- Tipping, M. E., & Bishop, C. M. (1999). Mixtures of Probabilistic Principal Component Analyzers. Neural Computation. https://doi.org/10.1162/089976699300016728
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.