Cited by 427Robot Manipulation and LearningReinforcement Learning in RoboticsHuman Motion and Animation

A tutorial on task-parameterized movement learning and retrieval

Open access
Calinon, Sylvain·2016·Intelligent Service Robotics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11370-015-0187-9

Cites

113 of 113 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Confidence-weighted Task-Parameterised movement learning can generate different trajectories from the same task parameters by weighting learned local models.

    “The authors show how different trajectories can be generated from the same set of task parameters through weighting of the learned local models.”
  • The paper builds on confidence weighting and frame importance sampling to present an autonomous method for weighting task frames during regression to improve extrapolation while retaining local structure.

    “To address these issues, this paper builds on the confidence weighting scheme presented in [7] and the frame importance sampling in [8], and presents an autonomous method for weighting task frames during regression to improve model extrapolation, while retaining local structure observed in demonstration data.”
  • The confidence-weighting scheme was proposed as a way to incorporate human prior knowledge about the importance of different task parameters.

    “The authors propose this is a useful mechanism for providing human prior knowledge about the importance of different task parameters to the model.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 117 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Krishnan S, Garg A, Patil S, Lea C, Hager G, Abbeel P, Goldberg K (2015) Unsupervised surgical task segmentation with milestone learning. In: Proceedings of international symposium on robotics research (ISRR)
  2. MacQueen JB (1967) Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations. In: Proceedings of of the 5th Berkeley symposium on mathematical statistics and probability, pp 281–297
  3. Wang Y, Zhu J (2015) DP-space: Bayesian nonparametric subspace clustering with small-variance asymptotics. In: Proceedings of international conference on machine learning (ICML), pp 1–9. Lille, France

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Calinon, S.
Affiliations
Idiap Research Institute (CH)
Corresponding author
Calinon, Sylvain
Venue
Intelligent Service Robotics
Published
2015-09-26
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
1-29
ISSN
  • 1861-2776 (ISSN-L)
  • 1861-2784
OpenAlex
W2100993276
Cited by
422
References
117
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 63 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 49 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 8
FWCI
23.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Intelligent Service Robotics (publishedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
EC Horizon 2020 (635491)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robot Manipulation and Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Human Motion and Animation
Keywords
reference frames, coordinate systems, basis functions, service robotics, robotic manipulation, behavior transfer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review