Cited by 284Virtual Reality Applications and ImpactsSimulation and Modeling ApplicationsSpaceflight effects on biology

Duration and Exposure to Virtual Environments: Sickness Curves During and Across Sessions

Open access
Kennedy, Robert S., Stanney, Kay M., Dunlap, William P.·2000·Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments

Abstract

Although simulator sickness is known to increase with protracted exposure and to diminish with repeated sessions, limited systematic research has been performed in these areas. This study reviewed the few studies with sufficient information available to determine the effect that exposure duration and repeated exposure have on motion sickness. This evaluation confirmed that longer exposures produce more symptoms and that total sickness subsides over repeated exposures. Additional evaluation was performed to investigate the precise form of this relationship and to determine whether the same form was generalizable across varied simulator environments. The results indicated that exposure duration and repeated exposures are significantly linearly related to sickness outcomes (duration being positively related and repetition negatively related to total sickness). This was true over diverse systems and large subject pools. This result verified the generalizability of the relationships among sickness, exposure duration, and repeated exposures. Additional research is indicated to determine the optimal length of a single exposure and the optimal intersession interval to facilitate adaptation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/105474600566952

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • VIMS is significantly reduced with repeated exposure.

    “For instance, Kennedy et al. (2000) and others (e.g., Hu et al., 1991) have shown that VIMS is significantly reduced with repeated exposure.”

    From Vection and visually induced motion sickness: how are they related? (2015) · cites this paper as Kennedy et al., 2000

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kennedy, R. S., Stanney, K. M., & Dunlap, W. P.
Affiliations
  • RSK Assessments (United States) (US)
  • University of Central Florida (US)
  • Tulane University (US)
Venue
Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments
Published
2000-10
Volume
9
Issue
5
Pages
463-472
ISSN
1054-7460 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2174960880
Cited by
284
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 8
FWCI
4.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PRESENCE Virtual and Augmented Reality (publishedVersion)
  • Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Simulation and Modeling Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Spaceflight effects on biology
Keywords
simulator sickness, motion sickness, virtual reality exposure, exposure duration, repeated exposure, virtual worlds

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review