The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Completely Derandomized Self-Adaptation in Evolution Strategies
Abstract
This paper puts forward two useful methods for self-adaptation of the mutation distribution - the concepts of derandomization and cumulation. Principle shortcomings of the concept of mutative strategy parameter control and two levels of derandomization are reviewed. Basic demands on the self-adaptation of arbitrary (normal) mutation distributions are developed. Applying arbitrary, normal mutation distributions is equivalent to applying a general, linear problem encoding. The underlying objective of mutative strategy parameter control is roughly to favor previously selected mutation steps in the future. If this objective is pursued rigorously, a completely derandomized self-adaptation scheme results, which adapts arbitrary normal mutation distributions. This scheme, called covariance matrix adaptation (CMA), meets the previously stated demands. It can still be considerably improved by cumulation - utilizing an evolution path rather than single search steps. Simulations on various test functions reveal local and global search properties of the evolution strategy with and without covariance matrix adaptation. Their performances are comparable only on perfectly scaled functions. On badly scaled, non-separable functions usually a speed up factor of several orders of magnitude is observed. On moderately mis-scaled functions a speed up factor of three to ten can be expected.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Due to its well-known robustness to local minima, the CMAES benchmark method”
From A Fully Differentiable Framework for 2D/3D Registration and the Projective Spatial Transformers (2024) · cites this paper as [40]
Citations
Cites
Numerical recipes in Pascal: the art of scientific computing
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-5158 · Cited by 12,040
Evolutionsstrategie : Optimierung technischer Systeme nach Prinzipien der biologischen Evolution
Rechenberg, I. (1973) · Frommann-Holzboog eBooks · Cited by 2,440
Schwefel, H. (1995) · Cited by 2,203
An Overview of Evolutionary Algorithms for Parameter Optimization
Bäck, T., & Schwefel, H. (1993) · Evolutionary Computation · doi:10.1162/evco.1993.1.1.1 · Cited by 2,111
Numerical optimization of computer models
(1982) · Mathematics and Computers in Simulation · doi:10.1016/0378-4754(82)90117-3 · Cited by 1,626
Evolutionary computation: Comments on the history and current state
Back, T., Hammel, U., & Schwefel, H.-P. (1997) · IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation · doi:10.1109/4235.585888 · Cited by 1,536 · cited 1×
“It is generally recognized that the typical values for μ = 15 and λ = 100 are not sufficient for this adaptation mechanism (Bäck et al., 1997).”
BackgroundHansen, N., & Ostermeier, A. (2002) · IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC) · doi:10.1109/icec.1996.542381 · Cited by 1,110
Self-citation(2000) · Institute of Physics eBooks · doi:10.1887/0750306645 · Cited by 765
A framework for evolutionary optimization with approximate fitness functions
Jin, Y., Olhofer, M., & Sendhoff, B. (2002) · IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation · doi:10.1109/tevc.2002.800884 · Cited by 663
Evolution and Optimum Seeking: The Sixth Generation
Schwefel, H. (1993) · John Wiley & Sons, Inc. eBooks · Cited by 652
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Cerveri P., 2001, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, in press.
- Olhofer M., 2000, Parmee, I., editor, Adaptive Computing in Design and Manufacture (ACDM), pages, 45
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 1,005
Fitting Neuron Models to Spike Trains
Rossant, C., Goodman, D. F. M., Fontaine, B., Platkiewicz, J., Magnusson, A. K., & Brette, R. (2011) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2011.00009 · Cited by 82
A general noise model and its effects on evolution strategy performance
Arnold, D. V., & Beyer, H.-G. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation · doi:10.1109/tevc.2005.859467 · Cited by 78
Zamuda, A., Sosa, J. D. H., & Adler, L. (2016) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2016.01.038 · Cited by 78
A novel hybrid differential evolution algorithm with modified CoDE and JADE
Li, G., Lin, Q., Cui, L., Du, Z., Liang, Z., Chen, J., Lu, N., & Ming, Z. (2016) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2016.06.011 · Cited by 78
OpenBox: A Generalized Black-box Optimization Service
Li, Y., Shen, Y., Zhang, W., Chen, Y., Jiang, H., Liu, M., Jiang, J., Gao, J., Wu, W., Yang, Z., et al. (2021) · ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) · doi:10.1145/3447548.3467061 · Cited by 77
Ten strategies towards successful calibration of environmental models
Mai, J. (2023) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129414 · Cited by 77
Differential Evolution: A Survey on Their Operators and Variants
Reyes-Dávila, E., Haro, E. H., Casas-Ordaz, Á., Oliva, D. A., & Ávalos, O. (2024) · Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering · doi:10.1007/s11831-024-10136-0 · Cited by 77
Dräger, A., Kronfeld, M., Ziller, M. J., Supper, J., Planatscher, H., Magnus, J. B., Oldiges, M., Kohlbacher, O., & Zell, A. (2009) · BMC Systems Biology · doi:10.1186/1752-0509-3-5 · Cited by 81
Competing G protein‐coupled receptor kinases balance G protein and β‐arrestin signaling
Heitzler, D., Durand, G., Gallay, N., Rizk, A., Ahn, S., Kim, J., Violin, J. D., Dupuy, L., Gauthier, C., Piketty, V., et al. (2012) · Molecular Systems Biology · doi:10.1038/msb.2012.22 · Cited by 83
Assembly dynamics of PML nuclear bodies in living cells
Brand, P., Lenser, T., & Hemmerich, P. H. (2010) · PMC Biophysics · doi:10.1186/1757-5036-3-3 · Cited by 77
Bayesian Multi-Scale Optimistic OptimizationPreprint
Wang, Z., Shakibi, B., Lin, J., & de Freitas, N. (2014) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1402.7005 · Cited by 77
Discovering the elite hypervolume by leveraging interspecies correlation
Vassiliades, V., & Mouret, J.-B. (2018) · Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO) · doi:10.1145/3205455.3205602 · Cited by 76
The moss growth optimization (MGO): concepts and performance
Zheng, B., Chen, Y., Wang, C., Heidari, A. A., Liu, L., & Chen, H. (2024) · Journal of Computational Design and Engineering · doi:10.1093/jcde/qwae080 · Cited by 76
Computer-Assisted Screw Size and Insertion Trajectory Planning for Pedicle Screw Placement Surgery
Knez, D., Likar, B., Pernuš, F., & Vrtovec, T. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2016.2514530 · Cited by 75
Design, realization and structural testing of a compliant adaptable wing
Molinari, G., Quack, M., Arrieta, A. F. F., Morari, M., & Ermanni, P. (2015) · Smart Materials and Structures · doi:10.1088/0964-1726/24/10/105027 · Cited by 76
Model-data interaction in groundwater studies: Review of methods, applications and future directions
Rajabi, M. M., Ataie‐Ashtiani, B., & Simmons, C. T. (2018) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.09.053 · Cited by 79
Language Model Crossover: Variation through Few-Shot Prompting
Meyerson, E., Nelson, M. J., Bradley, H., Gaier, A., Moradi, A., Hoover, A. K., & Lehman, J. (2024) · ACM Transactions on Evolutionary Learning and Optimization · doi:10.1145/3694791 · Cited by 75
A multiobjective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition and probability model
Zhou, A., Zhang, Q., & Zhang, G. (2012) · IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC) · doi:10.1109/cec.2012.6252954 · Cited by 75
Effective hyperparameter optimization using Nelder-Mead method in deep learning
Ozaki, Y., Masaki, Y., & Onishi, M. (2017) · IPSJ Transactions on Computer Vision and Applications · doi:10.1186/s41074-017-0030-7 · Cited by 81
Charging and Discharging Strategies of Electric Vehicles: A Survey
El‐Bayeh, C. Z., Alzaareer, K., Aldaoudeyeh, A. I., Brahmi, B., & Zellagui, M. (2021) · World Electric Vehicle Journal · doi:10.3390/wevj12010011 · Cited by 75
Improved step size adaptation for the MO-CMA-ES
Voß, T., Hansen, N., & Igel, C. (2010) · Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO) · doi:10.1145/1830483.1830573 · Cited by 77
Self-citationThe Sequential Parameter Optimization Toolbox
Bartz–Beielstein, T., Lasarczyk, C. W. G., & Preuß, M. (2010) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-02538-9_14 · Cited by 75
Comparison of climate datasets for lumped hydrological modeling over the continental United States
Essou, G. R. C., Arsenault, R., & Brissette, F. P. (2016) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.03.063 · Cited by 75
FUJII, G., Takahashi, M., & Akimoto, Y. (2018) · Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.cma.2018.01.008 · Cited by 75
Zamuda, A., & Sosa, J. D. H. (2018) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2018.10.048 · Cited by 76
Ohn-Bar, E., Prakash, A., Behl, A., Chitta, K., & Geiger, A. (2020) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.01131 · Cited by 76
Deterministic approaches for solving practical black-box global optimization problems
Kvasov, D. E., & Sergeyev, Y. D. (2014) · Advances in Engineering Software · doi:10.1016/j.advengsoft.2014.09.014 · Cited by 74
Rostami, S., & Neri, F. (2016) · Integrated Computer-Aided Engineering · doi:10.3233/ica-160529 · Cited by 74
Development of a hybrid computational intelligent model for daily global solar radiation prediction
Goliatt, L., & Yaseen, Z. M. (2022) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2022.118295 · Cited by 74
Real-time stereo vision: Optimizing Semi-Global Matching
Michael, M., Salmen, J., Stallkamp, J., & Schlipsing, M. (2013) · IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium · doi:10.1109/ivs.2013.6629629 · Cited by 74
Controlling the efficiency of an artificial light-harvesting complex
Savolainen, J., Fanciulli, R., Dijkhuizen, N., Moore, A. L., Hauer, J., Buckup, T., Motzkus, M., & Herek, J. L. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0711927105 · Cited by 74
Optimal shape and motion of undulatory swimming organisms
Tokić, G., & Yue, D. K. P. (2012) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2012.0057 · Cited by 74
Niching in Evolutionary Algorithms
Shir, O. M. (2012) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-92910-9_32 · Cited by 74
Multi-modal image registration based on gradient orientations of minimal uncertainty
De Nigris, D., Collins, D. L., & Arbel, T. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2012.2218116 · Cited by 73
Shin, M.-J., Guillaume, J. H. A., Croke, B., & Jakeman, A. J. (2014) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.11.040 · Cited by 73
Bayesian Optimization in High-Dimensional Spaces: A Brief Survey
Malu, M., Dasarathy, G., & Spanias, A. (2021) · International Conference on Information, Intelligence, Systems & Applications (IISA) · doi:10.1109/iisa52424.2021.9555522 · Cited by 73
Autonomous chemical science and engineering enabled by self-driving laboratories
Bennett, J. A., & Abolhasani, M. (2022) · Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.coche.2022.100831 · Cited by 73
Gim, J., Yang, H., & Turng, L. (2023) · Journal of Manufacturing Processes · doi:10.1016/j.jmapro.2022.12.055 · Cited by 73
Imani, M., & Arabnia, H. R. (2023) · Technologies · doi:10.3390/technologies11060167 · Cited by 73
Local Meta-models for Optimization Using Evolution Strategies
Kern, S., Hansen, N., & Koumoutsakos, P. (2006) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/11844297_95 · Cited by 73
Self-citationCerveri, P., Lopomo, N. F., Pedotti, A., & Ferrigno, G. (2005) · Annals of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10439-005-1743-9 · Cited by 73
The correlation-triggered adaptive variance scaling IDEA
Grahl, J., Bosman, P. A. N., & Rothlauf, F. (2006) · Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO) · doi:10.1145/1143997.1144071 · Cited by 73
Large Scale Black-Box Optimization by Limited-Memory Matrix Adaptation
Loshchilov, I., Glasmachers, T., & Beyer, H.-G. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation · doi:10.1109/tevc.2018.2855049 · Cited by 73
Particle swarm optimizer with adaptive tabu and mutation
Wang, Y., Xiang, Q.-L., & Zhao, Z. (2010) · ACM Transactions on Autonomous and Adaptive Systems · doi:10.1145/1671948.1671949 · Cited by 72
Biogeography-based optimization with covariance matrix based migration
Chen, X., Tianfield, H., Du, W., & Liu, G. (2016) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2016.04.022 · Cited by 72
A complex approach to assessing porous structure of structured ceramics obtained by SPS technique
Папынов, Е. К., Portnyagin, A. S., Modin, E. B., Mayorov, V. Y., Shichalin, O. O., Golikov, A. P., Pechnikov, V. S., Gridasova, E. A., Tananaev, I. G., & Avramenko, V. A. (2018) · Materials Characterization · doi:10.1016/j.matchar.2018.08.044 · Cited by 72
Trade-offs and synergies between livestock production and other ecosystem services
Accatino, F., Tonda, A. P., Dross, C., Léger, F. G., & Tichit, M. (2018) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2018.08.002 · Cited by 76
Zhong, R., Yu, J., Zhang, C., & Munetomo, M. (2024) · Neural Computing and Applications · doi:10.1007/s00521-024-09424-4 · Cited by 74
A general purpose real-world structural design optimization computing platform
Lagaros, N. D. (2013) · Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization · doi:10.1007/s00158-013-1027-1 · Cited by 72
Parameter fitting of PEMFC models based on adaptive differential evolution
Cheng, J., & Zhang, G. (2014) · International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems · doi:10.1016/j.ijepes.2014.04.043 · Cited by 72
Five decades of homonuclear dipolar decoupling in solid-state NMR: Status and outlook
Mote, K. R., Agarwal, V., & Madhu, P. K. (2016) · Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy · doi:10.1016/j.pnmrs.2016.08.001 · Cited by 72
Power, Linearity, and Efficiency Prediction for MIMO Arrays With Antenna Coupling
Barradas, F. M., Tome, P. M., Gomes, J. M., Cunha, T. R., Cabral, P. M., & Pedro, J. C. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques · doi:10.1109/tmtt.2017.2766067 · Cited by 72
Wortmann, T. (2018) · Journal of Computational Design and Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jcde.2018.09.001 · Cited by 74
Designing Competent Mutation Operators Via Probabilistic Model Building of Neighborhoods
Sastry, K., & Goldberg, D. E. (2004) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-24855-2_11 · Cited by 72
Approximate modified policy iteration and its application to the game of Tetris
Scherrer, B., Ghavamzadeh, M., Gabillon, V., Lesner, B., & Geist, M. (2015) · HAL · Cited by 71
Essou, G. R. C., Brissette, F. P., & Lucas‐Picher, P. (2016) · Journal of Hydrometeorology · doi:10.1175/jhm-d-16-0088.1 · Cited by 71
Bare Bones Particle Swarm Optimization With Scale Matrix Adaptation
Campos, M. C. M., Krohling, R. A., & Enriquez, I. R. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/tcyb.2013.2290223 · Cited by 70
Deep Reinforcement Learning: A Chronological Overview and Methods
Terven, J. R. (2025) · AI · doi:10.3390/ai6030046 · Cited by 98
An efficient framework for hydrologic model calibration on long data periods
Razavi, S., & Tolson, B. A. (2013) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1002/2012wr013442 · Cited by 70
A Hierarchical Gene Regulatory Network for Adaptive Multirobot Pattern Formation
Jin, Y., Guo, H., & Meng, Y. M. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Part B (Cybernetics) · doi:10.1109/tsmcb.2011.2178021 · Cited by 70
Optimizing the Hyper-parameters for SVM by Combining Evolution Strategies with a Grid Search
Liu, R., Liu, E., Yang, J., Li, M., & Wang, F. (2006) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/11816492_87 · Cited by 71
Reinforcement learning for optimization of variational quantum circuit architecturesPreprint
Ostaszewski, M., Trenkwalder, L. M., Masarczyk, W., Scerri, E., & Dunjko, V. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2103.16089 · Cited by 89
Elsayed, S. M., Sarker, R. A., Essam, D., & Hamza, N. M. (2014) · IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC) · doi:10.1109/cec.2014.6900308 · Cited by 69
Classical versus quantum models in machine learning: insights from a finance application
Alcazar, J., Leyton-Ortega, V., & Perdomo-Ortiz, A. (2020) · Machine Learning: Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2632-2153/ab9009 · Cited by 69
Experimental Comparisons of Derivative Free Optimization Algorithms
Auger, A., Hansen, N., Zerpa, J. M. P., Ros, R., & Schoenauer, M. (2009) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-02011-7_3 · Cited by 69
Self-citationAb Initio Derived Force Fields for Zeolitic Imidazolate Frameworks: MOF-FF for ZIFs
Dürholt, J. P., Fraux, G., Coudert, F., & Schmid, R. (2019) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.8b01041 · Cited by 69
Global optimization via inverse distance weighting and radial basis functions
Bemporad, A. (2020) · Computational Optimization and Applications · doi:10.1007/s10589-020-00215-w · Cited by 74
Continuous-Discrete Reinforcement Learning for Hybrid Control in RoboticsPreprint
Neunert, M., Abdolmaleki, A., Wulfmeier, M., Lampe, T., Springenberg, J. T., Hafner, R., Romano, F., Buchli, J., Heess, N., & Riedmiller, M. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2001.00449 · Cited by 70
Stisen, S., Koch, J., Sonnenborg, T. O., Refsgaard, J. C., Bircher, S., Ringgaard, R., & Jensen, K. H. (2018) · Hydrological Processes · doi:10.1002/hyp.13177 · Cited by 68
A Systematic Comparison of search-Based approaches for LDA hyperparameter tuning
Panichella, A. (2020) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2020.106411 · Cited by 78
Membrane permeability of small molecules from unbiased molecular dynamics simulations
Krämer, A., Ghysels, A., Wang, E. J. D., Venable, R. M., Klauda, J. B., Brooks, B. R., & Pastor, R. W. (2020) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/5.0013429 · Cited by 71
Bhattoo, R., Bishnoi, S., Zaki, M. F. M., & Krishnan, N. M. A. (2022) · Acta Materialia · doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2022.118439 · Cited by 80
Aero-Structural Optimization of Morphing Airfoils for Adaptive Wings
Molinari, G., Quack, M., Dmitriev, V., Morari, M., Jenny, P., & Ermanni, P. (2011) · Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures · doi:10.1177/1045389x11414089 · Cited by 68
Self-adaptive differential evolution algorithm with improved mutation strategy
Wang, S., Li, Y., Yang, H., & Liu, H. (2017) · Soft Computing · doi:10.1007/s00500-017-2588-5 · Cited by 68
A Simple Yet Efficient Evolution Strategy for Large-Scale Black-Box Optimization
Li, Z., & Zhang, Q. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation · doi:10.1109/tevc.2017.2765682 · Cited by 70
Varan, M., Erduman, A., & Menevşeoğlu, F. (2023) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en16135021 · Cited by 67
Ballester, P. J., & Carter, J. N. (2004) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-24854-5_91 · Cited by 67
Comparing neural networks and Kriging for fitness approximation in evolutionary optimization
Willmes, L., Bäck, T., Jin, Y., & Sendhoff, B. (2003) · IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC) · doi:10.1109/cec.2003.1299639 · Cited by 67
A Review of Proxy Modeling Highlighting Applications for Reservoir Engineering
Bahrami, P., Moghaddam, F. S., & James, L. A. (2022) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en15145247 · Cited by 68
A surrogate-assisted stochastic optimization inversion algorithm: Parameter identification of dams
Li, Y., Hariri‐Ardebili, M. A., Deng, T., Wei, Q., & Cao, M. (2022) · Advanced Engineering Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.aei.2022.101853 · Cited by 66
Policy Improvement Methods: Between Black-Box Optimization and Episodic Reinforcement Learning
Stulp, F., & Sigaud, O. (2012) · Cited by 66
Cost–Benefit Optimization of Structural Health Monitoring Sensor Networks
Capellari, G., Chatzi, E., & Mariani, S. (2018) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s18072174 · Cited by 66
Hardware-in-the-Loop End-to-End Optimization of Camera Image Processing Pipelines
Mosleh, A., Sharma, A. K., Onzon, E., Mannan, F., Robidoux, N., & Heide, F. (2020) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.00755 · Cited by 65
A Systematic Literature Review of the Successors of “NeuroEvolution of Augmenting Topologies”
Papavasileiou, E., Cornelis, J. P., & Jansen, B. (2020) · Evolutionary Computation · doi:10.1162/evco_a_00282 · Cited by 68
An End-to-End Differentiable Framework for Contact-Aware Robot Design
Xu, J., Chen, T., Zlokapa, L., Foshey, M., Matusik, W., Sueda, S., & Agrawal, P. (2021) · Robotics: Science and Systems · doi:10.15607/rss.2021.xvii.008 · Cited by 65
A particle swarm inspired cuckoo search algorithm for real parameter optimization
Li, X., & Yin, M. (2015) · Soft Computing · doi:10.1007/s00500-015-1594-8 · Cited by 65
Theoretical Foundation for CMA-ES from Information Geometry Perspective
Akimoto, Y., Nagata, Y., Ono, I., & Kobayashi, S. (2011) · Algorithmica · doi:10.1007/s00453-011-9564-8 · Cited by 65
Evolutionary multimodal optimization using the principle of locality
Wong, K., Wu, C. H., Mok, R. K. P., Peng, C., & Zhang, Z. (2012) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2011.12.016 · Cited by 65
Policy Gradients with Parameter-Based Exploration for Control
Sehnke, F., Osendorfer, C., Rückstieß, T., Graves, A., Peters, J., & Schmidhuber, J. (2008) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-87536-9_40 · Cited by 65
History-Based Topological Speciation for Multimodal Optimization
Li, L., & Tang, K. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation · doi:10.1109/tevc.2014.2306677 · Cited by 64
Brockhoff, D., Auger, A., Hansen, N., & Tušar, T. (2021) · Evolutionary Computation · doi:10.1162/evco_a_00298 · Cited by 64
Self-citationGeneric Neural Locomotion Control Framework for Legged Robots
Thor, M., Kulvičius, T., & Manoonpong, P. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2020.3016523 · Cited by 65
Richardson–Gaudin mean-field for strong correlation in quantum chemistry
Johnson, P. A., Fecteau, C., Berthiaume, F., Cloutier, S., Carrier, L., Gratton, M., Bultinck, P., Baerdemacker, S. D., Neck, D. V., Limacher, P. A., et al. (2020) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/5.0022189 · Cited by 64
de Melo, V. V., & Iacca, G. (2014) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2014.06.032 · Cited by 64
Dynamic and Quantitative Control of the DNA‐Mediated Growth of Gold Plasmonic Nanostructures
Shen, J., Xu, L., Wang, C., Pei, H., Tai, R., Song, S., Huang, Q., Fan, C., & Chen, G. (2014) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201402937 · Cited by 64
Model-Free Preference-Based Reinforcement Learning
Wirth, C., Fürnkranz, J., & Neumann, G. M. (2016) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v30i1.10269 · Cited by 69
Differential evolution with improved individual-based parameter setting and selection strategy
Tian, M., Gao, X., & Dai, C. (2017) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2017.03.010 · Cited by 64
Dual Differential Grouping: A More General Decomposition Method for Large-Scale Optimization
Li, J.-Y., Zhan, Z.-H., Tan, K. C., & Zhang, J. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/tcyb.2022.3158391 · Cited by 63
Özçelik, F., Choksi, B., Mozafari, M., Reddy, L., & VanRullen, R. (2022) · International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn55064.2022.9892673 · Cited by 75
Adaptive encoding for aerodynamic shape optimization using evolution strategies
Olhofer, M., Jin, Y., & Sendhoff, B. (2002) · IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC) · doi:10.1109/cec.2001.934443 · Cited by 63
Metadata
- Authors
- Hansen, N., & Ostermeier, A.
- Affiliations
- Technische Universität Berlin (DE)
- ORCID
- Hansen, Nikolaus
- Venue
- Evolutionary Computation
- Publisher
- MIT Press
- Published
- 2001-06
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 159-195
- ISSN
- 1063-6560 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-9304
- OpenAlex
- W2112036188
- Cited by
- 4,397
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 342 · 2025: 296 · 2024: 247 · 2023: 260 · 2022: 261 · 2021: 295 · 2020: 279 · 2019: 253 · 2018: 243 · 2017: 202 · 2016: 204 · 2015: 174 · 2014: 210 · 2013: 152 · 2012: 179
- FWCI
- 31.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Evolutionary Computation (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms Research
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Evolutionary Algorithms and Applications
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
- Keywords
- evolution strategies, self-adaptation, derandomization, covariance matrix adaptation, mutation distribution, cumulation, evolution path, global and local search
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Computer Simulation, Biological Evolution, Models, Genetic, Mutation, Stochastic Processes, Models, Statistical
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review