The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Completely Derandomized Self-Adaptation in Evolution Strategies
Abstract
This paper puts forward two useful methods for self-adaptation of the mutation distribution - the concepts of derandomization and cumulation. Principle shortcomings of the concept of mutative strategy parameter control and two levels of derandomization are reviewed. Basic demands on the self-adaptation of arbitrary (normal) mutation distributions are developed. Applying arbitrary, normal mutation distributions is equivalent to applying a general, linear problem encoding. The underlying objective of mutative strategy parameter control is roughly to favor previously selected mutation steps in the future. If this objective is pursued rigorously, a completely derandomized self-adaptation scheme results, which adapts arbitrary normal mutation distributions. This scheme, called covariance matrix adaptation (CMA), meets the previously stated demands. It can still be considerably improved by cumulation - utilizing an evolution path rather than single search steps. Simulations on various test functions reveal local and global search properties of the evolution strategy with and without covariance matrix adaptation. Their performances are comparable only on perfectly scaled functions. On badly scaled, non-separable functions usually a speed up factor of several orders of magnitude is observed. On moderately mis-scaled functions a speed up factor of three to ten can be expected.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Due to its well-known robustness to local minima, the CMAES benchmark method”
From A Fully Differentiable Framework for 2D/3D Registration and the Projective Spatial Transformers (2024) · cites this paper as [40]
Citations
Cites
Numerical recipes in Pascal: the art of scientific computing
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-5158 · Cited by 12,040
Evolutionsstrategie : Optimierung technischer Systeme nach Prinzipien der biologischen Evolution
Rechenberg, I. (1973) · Frommann-Holzboog eBooks · Cited by 2,440
Schwefel, H. (1995) · Cited by 2,203
An Overview of Evolutionary Algorithms for Parameter Optimization
Bäck, T., & Schwefel, H. (1993) · Evolutionary Computation · doi:10.1162/evco.1993.1.1.1 · Cited by 2,111
Numerical optimization of computer models
(1982) · Mathematics and Computers in Simulation · doi:10.1016/0378-4754(82)90117-3 · Cited by 1,626
Evolutionary computation: Comments on the history and current state
Back, T., Hammel, U., & Schwefel, H.-P. (1997) · IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation · doi:10.1109/4235.585888 · Cited by 1,536 · cited 1×
“It is generally recognized that the typical values for μ = 15 and λ = 100 are not sufficient for this adaptation mechanism (Bäck et al., 1997).”
BackgroundHansen, N., & Ostermeier, A. (2002) · IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC) · doi:10.1109/icec.1996.542381 · Cited by 1,110
Self-citation(2000) · Institute of Physics eBooks · doi:10.1887/0750306645 · Cited by 765
A framework for evolutionary optimization with approximate fitness functions
Jin, Y., Olhofer, M., & Sendhoff, B. (2002) · IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation · doi:10.1109/tevc.2002.800884 · Cited by 663
Evolution and Optimum Seeking: The Sixth Generation
Schwefel, H. (1993) · John Wiley & Sons, Inc. eBooks · Cited by 652
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Cerveri P., 2001, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, in press.
- Olhofer M., 2000, Parmee, I., editor, Adaptive Computing in Design and Manufacture (ACDM), pages, 45
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 701–800 of 1,005
Evolutionary Bilevel Optimization Based on Covariance Matrix Adaptation
He, X., Zhou, Y., & Chen, Z. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation · doi:10.1109/tevc.2018.2849000 · Cited by 44
Learning an Interpretable Traffic Signal Control Policy
Ault, J., Hanna, J. P., & Sharon, G. (2020) · Adaptive Agents and Multi-Agents Systems · doi:10.65109/ydpi1201 · Cited by 60
Vitruvio: An Open-Source Leg Design Optimization Toolbox for Walking Robots
Chadwick, M., Kolvenbach, H., Dubois, F., Lau, H. F., & Hutter, M. (2020) · IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters · doi:10.1109/lra.2020.3013913 · Cited by 44
Adaptive levy-assisted salp swarm algorithm: Analysis and optimization case studies
Ren, H., Li, J., Chen, H., & Li, C. (2020) · Mathematics and Computers in Simulation · doi:10.1016/j.matcom.2020.09.027 · Cited by 44
Qi, P., Jiang, T., Wang, L., Yuan, X., & Li, Z. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Reliability · doi:10.1109/tr.2022.3161138 · Cited by 48
Bayer, P., & Finkel, M. (2007) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/2005wr004753 · Cited by 44
Active covariance matrix adaptation for the (1+1)-CMA-ES
Arnold, D. V., & Hansen, N. (2010) · Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO) · doi:10.1145/1830483.1830556 · Cited by 44
Self-citationAutomated Design Optimization of Compressor Blades for Stationary, Large-Scale Turbomachinery
Büche, D., Guidati, G., & Stoll, P. (2003) · ASME Turbo Expo: Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition (GT) · doi:10.1115/gt2003-38421 · Cited by 44
Alternative Restart Strategies for CMA-ES
Loshchilov, I., Schoenauer, M., & Sébag, M. (2012) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-32937-1_30 · Cited by 43
Modified differential evolution with self-adaptive parameters method
Li, X., & Yin, M. (2014) · Journal of Combinatorial Optimization · doi:10.1007/s10878-014-9773-6 · Cited by 43
Roslund, J., Shir, O. M., Bäck, T., & RABITZ, H. A. (2009) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.80.043415 · Cited by 43
A calibration strategy for dynamic succession models including several phytoplankton groups
Rigosi, A., Marcé, R., Escot, C., & Rueda, F. J. (2011) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.01.007 · Cited by 43
Differential evolution for parameterized procedural woody plant models reconstruction
Zamuda, A., Brest, J., Boškovič, B., & Zumer, V. (2011) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2011.06.009 · Cited by 44
Consideration of Voidage Replacement Ratio in Well Placement Optimization
Awotunde, A. A., & Sibaweihi, N. (2012) · SPE Kuwait International Petroleum Conference and Exhibition · doi:10.2118/163354-ms · Cited by 43
Cerveri, P., Momi, E. D., Marchente, M., Lopomo, N. F., Baud‐Bovy, G., de Barros, R. M. L., & Ferrigno, G. (2008) · Annals of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10439-008-9499-7 · Cited by 43
Yu, K., Wang, X., & Wang, Z. (2016) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2015.12.020 · Cited by 43
Wang, J., Uchibe, E., & Doya, K. (2017) · Frontiers in Neurorobotics · doi:10.3389/fnbot.2017.00001 · Cited by 43
Kumar, M., Rawat, T. K., & Aggarwal, A. (2017) · ISA Transactions · doi:10.1016/j.isatra.2016.10.018 · Cited by 43
Apparent ecosystem carbon turnover time: uncertainties and robust features
Fan, N., Koirala, S., Reichstein, M., Thurner, M., Avitabile, V., Santoro, M., Ahrens, B., Weber, U., & Carvalhais, N. (2020) · Earth system science data · doi:10.5194/essd-12-2517-2020 · Cited by 43
Quantum-like mutation-induced dragonfly-inspired optimization approach
Yu, C., Cai, Z., Ye, X., Wang, M., Zhao, X., Liang, G., Chen, H., & Li, C. (2020) · Mathematics and Computers in Simulation · doi:10.1016/j.matcom.2020.06.012 · Cited by 44
A Diversity-Enhanced Subset Selection Framework for Multimodal Multiobjective Optimization
Peng, Y., & Ishibuchi, H. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation · doi:10.1109/tevc.2021.3117702 · Cited by 43
A new method for finite element model updating in structural dynamics
Zapico-Valle, J. L., Alonso-Camblor, R., Martínez, M. P. G., & García-Diéguez, M. (2010) · Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2010.03.011 · Cited by 43
Auger, A. (2009) · Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference Companion (GECCO Companion) · doi:10.1145/1570256.1570342 · Cited by 43
Optimization of Well Placement Using Evolutionary Algorithms
Ding, D. Y. (2008) · EAGE Conference and Exhibition incorporating SPE EUROPEC · doi:10.2118/113525-ms · Cited by 43
Theory of Evolution Strategies: A New Perspective
Auger, A., & Hansen, N. (2011) · Series on Theoretical Computer Science · doi:10.1142/9789814282673_0010 · Cited by 42
Self-citationMarson, R. L., Nguyen, T. D., & Glotzer, S. C. (2015) · MRS Communications · doi:10.1557/mrc.2015.54 · Cited by 42
Natural actor and belief critic
Jurčíček, F., Thomson, B., & Young, S. J. (2011) · ACM Transactions on Speech and Language Processing · doi:10.1145/1966407.1966411 · Cited by 42
Particle swarm optimization with dual-level task allocation
Lim, W. H., & Isa, N. A. M. (2014) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2014.10.022 · Cited by 42
Log-Linear Convergence and Divergence of the Scale-Invariant (1+1)-ES in Noisy Environments
Jebalia, M., Auger, A., & Hansen, N. (2010) · Algorithmica · doi:10.1007/s00453-010-9403-3 · Cited by 42
Self-citationUneri, A., Silva, T. D., Goerres, J., Jacobson, M. W., Ketcha, M. D., Reaungamornrat, S., Kleinszig, G., Vogt, S. K., Khanna, A. J., Osgood, G. M., et al. (2017) · Physics in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1088/1361-6560/aa62c5 · Cited by 42
Vogl, W., Waldstein, S. M., Gerendas, B. S., Schmidt-Erfurth, U. M., & Langs, G. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2017.2700213 · Cited by 42
Gerard, I. J., Kersten‐Oertel, M., Drouin, S., Hall, J. A., Petrecca, K., Nigris, D. D., Giovanni, D. A. D., Arbel, T., & Collins, D. L. (2018) · Journal of medical imaging · doi:10.1117/1.jmi.5.2.021210 · Cited by 42
Roncen, T., Sinou, J.-J., & Lambelin, J.-P. (2019) · Journal of Sound and Vibration · doi:10.1016/j.jsv.2019.03.017 · Cited by 42
Efficacy of Modern Neuro-Evolutionary Strategies for Continuous Control Optimization
Pagliuca, P., Milano, N., & Nolfi, S. (2020) · Frontiers in Robotics and AI · doi:10.3389/frobt.2020.00098 · Cited by 42
Black-Box Optimization Revisited: Improving Algorithm Selection Wizards Through Massive Benchmarking
Meunier, L., Rakotoarison, H., Wong, P.-K., Rozière, B., Rapin, J., Teytaud, O., Moreau, A., & Doerr, C. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation · doi:10.1109/tevc.2021.3108185 · Cited by 42
Warm Starting CMA-ES for Hyperparameter Optimization
Nomura, M., Watanabe, S., Akimoto, Y., Ozaki, Y., & Onishi, M. (2021) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v35i10.17109 · Cited by 49
Salgotra, R., Singh, U., Singh, G., Mittal, N., & Gandomi, A. H. (2021) · Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.cma.2021.113916 · Cited by 42
Per-run Algorithm Selection with Warm-Starting Using Trajectory-Based Features
Kostovska, A., Jankovič, A., Vermetten, D., de Nobel, J., Wang, H., Eftimov, T., & Doerr, C. (2022) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-14714-2_4 · Cited by 42
Self-Organizing Nets for Optimization
Milano, M., Koumoutsakos, P., & Schmidhuber, J. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks · doi:10.1109/tnn.2004.826132 · Cited by 42
AdaLead: A simple and robust adaptive greedy search algorithm for sequence designPreprint
Sinai, S., Wang, R., Whatley, A., Slocum, S., Locane, E., & Kelsic, E. D. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.02141 · Cited by 99
A Survey of Exploration Methods in Reinforcement Learning
Amin, S., Gomrokchi, M., Satija, H., van Hoof, H., & Precup, D. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2109.00157 · Cited by 41
Lu, Y., Li, B., Liu, S., & Zhou, A. (2023) · Swarm and Evolutionary Computation · doi:10.1016/j.swevo.2023.101377 · Cited by 41
Evolutionary feature weighting to improve the performance of multi-label lazy algorithms
Reyes, Ó., Morell, C., & Ventura, S. (2014) · Integrated Computer-Aided Engineering · doi:10.3233/ica-140468 · Cited by 41
Hardware-friendly Higher-Order Neural Network Training using Distributed Evolutionary Algorithms
Epitropakis, M. G., Plagianakos, V. P., & Vrahatis, M. N. (2009) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2009.08.010 · Cited by 41
Statistical Methods for Convergence Detection of Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms
Trautmann, H., Wagner, T., Naujoks, B., Preuß, M., & Mehnen, J. (2009) · Evolutionary Computation · doi:10.1162/evco.2009.17.4.17403 · Cited by 41
RFID Networks Planning Using Evolutionary Algorithms and Swarm Intelligence
Chen, H., & Zhu, Y. (2008) · International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing · doi:10.1109/wicom.2008.680 · Cited by 41
Projection-Based Restricted Covariance Matrix Adaptation for High Dimension
Akimoto, Y., & Hansen, N. (2016) · Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO) · doi:10.1145/2908812.2908863 · Cited by 41
Self-citationGray Box Modeling of Power Transformer Windings for Transient Studies
Aghmasheh, R., Rashtchi, V., & Rahimpour, E. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery · doi:10.1109/tpwrd.2017.2649484 · Cited by 41
An adaptive differential evolution algorithm with an aging leader and challengers mechanism
Fu, C. M., Jiang, C., Chen, G. S., & Liu, Q. (2017) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2017.03.032 · Cited by 41
Bayesian Optimization with Automatic Prior Selection for Data-Efficient Direct Policy Search
Pautrat, R., Chatzilygeroudis, K. I., & Mouret, J.-B. (2018) · Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/icra.2018.8463197 · Cited by 41
Munch, F., Grayver, A. V., KUVSHINOV, A. V., & Khan, A. (2017) · Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth · doi:10.1002/2017jb014691 · Cited by 41
Multi-layer competitive-cooperative framework for performance enhancement of differential evolution
Zhang, S. X., Zheng, L. M., Tang, K. S., Zheng, S. Y., & Chan, W. S. (2019) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2018.12.065 · Cited by 41
Parameter calibration in global soil carbon models using surrogate-based optimization
Xu, H., Zhang, T., Luo, Y., Huang, X., & Xue, W. (2018) · Geoscientific model development · doi:10.5194/gmd-11-3027-2018 · Cited by 43
A Covariance Matrix Self-Adaptation Evolution Strategy for Optimization Under Linear Constraints
Spettel, P., Beyer, H.-G., & Hellwig, M. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation · doi:10.1109/tevc.2018.2871944 · Cited by 41
Keidel, D., Molinari, G., & Ermanni, P. (2019) · Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures · doi:10.1177/1045389x19828501 · Cited by 41
An Improved Squirrel Search Algorithm for Global Function Optimization
Wang, Y., & Du, T. (2019) · Algorithms · doi:10.3390/a12040080 · Cited by 41
The blind implosion-maker: Automated inertial confinement fusion experiment design
Hatfield, P. W., Rose, S. J., & Scott, R. H. H. (2019) · Physics of Plasmas · doi:10.1063/1.5091985 · Cited by 41
Global Sensitivity Analysis for Optimization with Variable Selection
Spagnol, A., Riche, R. L., & da Veiga, S. (2019) · SIAM/ASA Journal on Uncertainty Quantification · doi:10.1137/18m1167978 · Cited by 41
Surrogate-Assisted Evolutionary Search of Spiking Neural Architectures in Liquid State Machines
Zhou, Y., Jin, Y., & Ding, J. (2020) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2020.04.079 · Cited by 43
Discovering Representations for Black-box Optimization
Gaier, A., Asteroth, A., & Mouret, J.-B. (2020) · Publication Server of Bonn-Rhein-Sieg University of Applied Sciences (Bonn-Rhein-Sieg University of Applied Sciences) · Cited by 41
Natural evolutionary strategies for variational quantum computation
Anand, A., Degroote, M., & Aspuru‐Guzik, A. (2021) · Machine Learning Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2632-2153/abf3ac · Cited by 44
Animal-in-the-Loop: Using Interactive Robotic Conspecifics to Study Social Behavior in Animal Groups
Landgraf, T., Gebhardt, G. H. W., Bierbach, D., Romańczuk, P., Musiolek, L. M., Hafner, V. V., & Krause, J. (2020) · Annual Review of Control Robotics and Autonomous Systems · doi:10.1146/annurev-control-061920-103228 · Cited by 42
Donegan, S., Murphy, C., Harrigan, S., Broderick, C., Golian, S., Knight, J., Matthews, T., Prudhomme, C., Quinn, D. F., Scaife, A. A., et al. (2021) · Hydrology and earth system sciences · doi:10.5194/hess-25-4159-2021 · Cited by 43
Wang, W., Xu, L., Chau, K., Zhao, Y. S., & Xu, D.-M. (2021) · Engineering With Computers · doi:10.1007/s00366-020-01248-9 · Cited by 41
Electromagnetic-acoustic biphysical cloak designed through topology optimization
FUJII, G., & Akimoto, Y. (2022) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.450787 · Cited by 41
A framework for generating tunable test functions for multimodal optimization
Rönkkönen, J., Li, X., Kyrki, V., & Lampinen, J. (2010) · Soft Computing · doi:10.1007/s00500-010-0611-1 · Cited by 41
Qualms Regarding the Optimality of Cumulative Path Length Control in CSA/CMA-Evolution Strategies
Beyer, H.-G., & Arnold, D. V. (2003) · Evolutionary Computation · doi:10.1162/106365603321828989 · Cited by 41
Francone, F. D., & Deschaine, L. M. (2003) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2003.05.006 · Cited by 41
Evolutionary Gradient Search Revisited
Arnold, D. V., & Salomon, R. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation · doi:10.1109/tevc.2006.882427 · Cited by 41
Integrated anticipatory control of road networks: A game-theoretical approach
Taale, H. (2008) · Research Repository (Delft University of Technology) · Cited by 41
Shape optimization for drag reduction in linked bodies using evolution strategies
Gazzola, M., Vasilyev, O. V., & Koumoutsakos, P. (2010) · Computers & Structures · doi:10.1016/j.compstruc.2010.09.001 · Cited by 40
Kazim, M. Z., Hong, J., Kim, M.-G., & Kim, K. K. (2024) · Annual Reviews in Control · doi:10.1016/j.arcontrol.2023.100931 · Cited by 47
Revisiting CEC 2022 ranking: A new ranking method and influence of parameter tuning
Biedrzycki, R. (2024) · Swarm and Evolutionary Computation · doi:10.1016/j.swevo.2024.101623 · Cited by 40
LLMOA: A novel large language model assisted hyper-heuristic optimization algorithm
Zhong, R., Hussien, A. G., Yu, J., & Munetomo, M. (2025) · Advanced Engineering Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.aei.2024.103042 · Cited by 40
Yin, S., & Xiang, Z. (2025) · Ocean Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2025.121241 · Cited by 40
Aittokoski, T., & Miettinen, K. (2010) · Optimization methods & software · doi:10.1080/10556780903548265 · Cited by 40
Intensive surrogate model exploitation in self-adaptive surrogate-assisted cma-es (saacm-es)
Loshchilov, I., Schoenauer, M., & Sébag, M. (2013) · Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO) · doi:10.1145/2463372.2463427 · Cited by 40
Improved Electromagnetics Optimization: The covariance matrix adaptation evolutionary strategy
Gregory, M. D., Martin, S. V., & Werner, D. H. (2015) · IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine · doi:10.1109/map.2015.2437277 · Cited by 40
The structure of phenol-Arn (n=1,2) clusters in their S and S1 states
Kalkman, I. M., Brand, C., Vu, T. B. C., Meerts, W. L., Svartsov, Y. N., Dopfer, O., Tong, X., Müller‐Dethlefs, K. J., Grimme, S., & Schmitt, M. (2009) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.3149780 · Cited by 40
Advancing x-ray scattering metrology using inverse genetic algorithms
Hannon, A. F., Sunday, D. F., Windover, D., & Kline, R. J. (2016) · Journal of Micro/Nanopatterning Materials and Metrology · doi:10.1117/1.jmm.15.3.034001 · Cited by 40
Estimation of landfill methane emissions using stochastic search methods
Kormi, T., Ali, N. B. H., Abichou, T., & Green, R. (2016) · Atmospheric Pollution Research · doi:10.1016/j.apr.2016.12.020 · Cited by 40
Can Serial Dependencies in Choices and Neural Activity Explain Choice Probabilities?
Lueckmann, J.-M., Macke, J. H., & Nienborg, H. (2018) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2225-17.2018 · Cited by 37
Cubukcuoglu, C., Ekici, B., Tasgetiren, M. F., & Sarıyıldız, S. (2019) · Algorithms · doi:10.3390/a12070141 · Cited by 44
A covariance matrix adaptation evolution strategy variant and its engineering application
Liang, Y., Wang, X., Zhao, H. J., Han, T., Wei, Z., & Li, Y. (2019) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105680 · Cited by 40
Nand, R., Sharma, B. N., & Chaudhary, K. (2021) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107517 · Cited by 40
Tatsis, K., Agathos, K., Chatzi, E., & Dertimanis, V. K. (2021) · Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.108558 · Cited by 41
BBTv2: Towards a Gradient-Free Future with Large Language Models
Sun, T., He, Z., Qian, H., Zhou, Y., Huang, X., & Qiu, X. (2022) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.259 · Cited by 60
Yoon, H., Hart, D. B., & McKenna, S. A. (2013) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1002/wrcr.20064 · Cited by 40
Optimization of the profile and distribution of absorption material in sonic black holes
Serra, G., Guasch, O., Arnela, M., & Miralles, D. (2023) · Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2023.110707 · Cited by 39
Spatial tuning of the positive and negative Poisson's ratio of metamaterials through gradient design
Zhou, X., Liu, X., Zhao, A., Liu, C., & Wu, H. (2024) · Thin-Walled Structures · doi:10.1016/j.tws.2024.112382 · Cited by 39
Hierarchical Artificial Bee Colony Algorithm for RFID Network Planning Optimization
Ma, L., Chen, H., Hu, K., & Zhu, Y. (2014) · The Scientific World JOURNAL · doi:10.1155/2014/941532 · Cited by 39
An Analysis of Mutative σ-Self-Adaptation on Linear Fitness Functions
Hansen, N. (2006) · Evolutionary Computation · doi:10.1162/evco.2006.14.3.255 · Cited by 39
Self-citationSwarm Intelligence Platform for Multiblock Polymer Inverse Formulation Design
Paradiso, S. P., Delaney, K. T., & Fredrickson, G. H. (2016) · ACS Macro Letters · doi:10.1021/acsmacrolett.6b00494 · Cited by 41
Nearest neighbour cuckoo search algorithm with probabilistic mutation
Wang, L., Zhong, Y., & Yin, Y. (2016) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2016.08.021 · Cited by 39
An optimal safety assessment model for complex systems considering correlation and redundancy
Li, G., Zhou, Z., Hu, C., Chang, L., Zhang, H., & Yu, C. (2018) · International Journal of Approximate Reasoning · doi:10.1016/j.ijar.2018.10.004 · Cited by 39
Guzavina, M., Grayver, A. V., & KUVSHINOV, A. V. (2019) · Geophysical Journal International · doi:10.1093/gji/ggz412 · Cited by 39
Near-exact treatment of seniority-zero ground and excited states with a Richardson–Gaudin mean-field
Fecteau, C., Cloutier, S., Moisset, J.-D., Boulay, J., Bultinck, P., Faribault, A., & Johnson, P. A. (2022) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/5.0091338 · Cited by 39
Preference-Driven Texture Modeling Through Interactive Generation and Search
Lu, S., Zheng, M., Fontaine, M. C., Nikolaidis, S., & Culbertson, H. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Haptics · doi:10.1109/toh.2022.3173935 · Cited by 39
Wang, K., Wang, Y., Tao, S., Cai, Z., Lei, Z., & Gao, S. (2022) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2022.109845 · Cited by 39
Ranking teaching–learning-based optimization algorithm to estimate the parameters of solar models
Yu, X., Hu, Z., Wang, X., & Luo, W. (2023) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2023.106225 · Cited by 39
Metadata
- Authors
- Hansen, N., & Ostermeier, A.
- Affiliations
- Technische Universität Berlin (DE)
- ORCID
- Hansen, Nikolaus
- Venue
- Evolutionary Computation
- Publisher
- MIT Press
- Published
- 2001-06
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 159-195
- ISSN
- 1063-6560 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-9304
- OpenAlex
- W2112036188
- Cited by
- 4,397
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 342 · 2025: 296 · 2024: 247 · 2023: 260 · 2022: 261 · 2021: 295 · 2020: 279 · 2019: 253 · 2018: 243 · 2017: 202 · 2016: 204 · 2015: 174 · 2014: 210 · 2013: 152 · 2012: 179
- FWCI
- 31.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Evolutionary Computation (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms Research
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Evolutionary Algorithms and Applications
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
- Keywords
- evolution strategies, self-adaptation, derandomization, covariance matrix adaptation, mutation distribution, cumulation, evolution path, global and local search
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Computer Simulation, Biological Evolution, Models, Genetic, Mutation, Stochastic Processes, Models, Statistical
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review