Cited by 406Modular Robots and Swarm IntelligenceDistributed Control Multi-Agent SystemsComplex Systems and Dynamics

Stigmergy, Self-Organization, and Sorting in Collective Robotics

Holland, Owen, Melhuish, Chris·1999·Artificial Life

Abstract

Many structures built by social insects are the outcome of a process of self-organization, in which the repeated actions of the insects interact over time with the changing physical environment to produce a characteristic end state. A major mediating factor is stigmergy, the elicitation of specific environment-changing behaviors by the sensory effects of local environmental changes produced by previous behavior. A typical task involving stigmergic self-organization is brood sorting: Many ant species sort their brood so that items at similar stages of development are grouped together and separated from items at different stages of development. This article examines the operation of stigmergy and self-organization in a homogeneous group of physical robots, in the context of the task of clustering and sorting Frisbees of two different types. Using a behavioral rule set simpler than any yet proposed for ant sorting, and having no capacity for spatial orientation or memory, the robots are able to achieve effective clustering and sorting showing all the signs of self-organization. It is argued that the success of this demonstration is crucially dependent on the exploitation of real-world physics, and that the use of simulation alone to investigate stigmergy may fail to reveal its power as an evolutionary option for collective life forms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/106454699568737

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Different ways have been proposed to control or steer robot swarms directly by the user, such as through gestures or EEG signals.

    “Alternatively, robot swarms could be controlled or steered directly by the user, and different ways have been proposed, such as through gestures [108], [109] or EEG signals [110].”

    From Swarm Robotics: Past, Present, and Future [Point of View] (2021) · cites this paper as [108]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Holland, O., & Melhuish, C.
Affiliations
University of the West of England (GB)
Venue
Artificial Life
Published
1999-04
Volume
5
Issue
2
Pages
173-202
ISSN
  • 1064-5462 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-9185
OpenAlex
W2109250000
Cited by
406
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 20
FWCI
20.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Artificial Life (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Modular Robots and Swarm Intelligence
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Distributed Control Multi-Agent Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Systems and Dynamics
Keywords
stigmergy, self-organization, collective robotics, ant behavior, swarm robotics, physical robots, social insects, simulation limitations
MeSH terms
Animals, Ants, Models, Biological, Robotics, Social Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review