The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Consumption and the Rebound Effect: An Industrial Ecology Perspective
Abstract
Summary: Measures taken to protect the environment often have other, unintended effects on society. One concern is that changed behavior may offset part of the environmental gain, something that has variously been labeled “take‐back” or “rebound.” In energy economics, the rebound effect encompasses both the behavioral and systems responses to cost reductions of energy services as a result of energy efficiency measures. From an industrial ecology perspective, we are concerned about more than just energy use. Any given efficiency measure has several types of environmental impacts. Changes in the various impact indicators are not necessarily in the same direction. Both co‐benefits and negative side effects of measures directed to solve one type of problem have been identified. Environment is often a free input, so that a price‐based rebound effect is not expected, but other indirect effects not connected to the price, such as spillover of environmental behavior, also occur. If the costs and impact of products that are already environmentally friendly are reduced, the “rebound” can be in the opposite, desired direction. Furthermore, I identify technical spillover effects. Hence a number of related effects, often producing positive results, are not as well understood. Household environmental impact assessments and eco‐efficiency assessments take into account the rebound effect, but they do not necessarily take into account these other effects. The analysis hence indicates that the current focus on the rebound effect is too narrow and needs to be extended to cover co‐benefits, negative side effects, and spillover effects.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Khazzoom-Brookes postulate and neoclassical growth
Saunders, H. D. (1992) · The Energy Journal · doi:10.5547/issn0195-6574-ej-vol13-no4-7 · Cited by 665
A view from the macro side: Rebound, backfire, and Khazzoom–Brookes
Saunders, H. D. (2000) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/s0301-4215(00)00024-0 · Cited by 326
On the rebound? Feedback between energy intensities and energy uses in IEA countries
Schipper, L., & Grubb, M. (2000) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/s0301-4215(00)00018-5 · Cited by 253
Cited by
Recent developments in life cycle assessment
Finnveden, G., Hauschild, M. Z., Ekvall, T., Guinée, J., Heijungs, R., Hellweg, S., Koehler, A., Pennington, D., & Suh, S. (2009) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.06.018 · Cited by 3,444
Comparative Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Conventional and Electric Vehicles
Hawkins, T. R., Singh, B., Majeau‐Bettez, G., & Strømman, A. H. (2013) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1530-9290.2012.00532.x · Cited by 1,670
Font, X., & McCabe, S. (2017) · Journal of Sustainable Tourism · doi:10.1080/09669582.2017.1301721 · Cited by 478
Bauer, C., Hofer, J., Althaus, H.-J., Del Duce, A., & Simons, A. (2015) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.01.019 · Cited by 430
The Circular Economy: Swings and Roundabouts?
Millar, N., McLaughlin, E., & Börger, T. (2019) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.12.012 · Cited by 435
Metadata
- Authors
- Hertwich, E. G.
- Venue
- Journal of Industrial Ecology
- Published
- 2005-01
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 85-98
- ISSN
- 1088-1980 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-9290
- OpenAlex
- W2041389290
- Cited by
- 604
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 14.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Consumption and the Rebound Effect: An Industrial Ecology Perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1162/1088198054084635
- The paper
- Hertwich, E. G. (2005). Consumption and the Rebound Effect: An Industrial Ecology Perspective. Journal of Industrial Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1162/1088198054084635
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.