Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 192

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Race, Class and the Global Politics of Environmental Inequality

Open access
Newell, Peter·2005·Global Environmental Politics

Abstract

The politics of natural resource access, control and exploitation assume fundamental relations of social power; they imply them and consolidate them. Environmental issues reflect broader patterns of domination and social exclusion at work in global politics which enable us to understand who benefits from the current distribution of environmental benefits and which social groups shoulder a disproportionate amount of the burden of pollution. The task, however, is not merely to identify those global structures that produce environmental inequities and injustices, but to show how, in some cases, those structures are supported and entrenched by the institutional configurations that we continue to assume are generating the solutions to environmental degradation. Towards this end, I connect debates about the global managerial class and critiques of the prevailing sustainable development historical bloc with more localized studies of the consequences of organized inequality and the strategies adopted by marginalized groups to contest their fate as victims of environmental injustice. Such an approach builds upon the project which Marian Miller began with her enquiries into the Third World in global environmental politics, emphasizing the importance of the global political economy in shaping those political relations. Political and social cleavages of race, class and gender are shown to be key to understanding the global organization of environmental inequality and justice, though it is the neglect of the first two dimensions, in particular, that forms the core concern of this paper. Their importance in understanding patterns of causation (distribution of benefit), process (access, voice, representation) and distribution (of harm) is highlighted through reference to a range of contemporary case studies in the global North and South.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/1526380054794835

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. Babcock Hope, 1995, Stanford Environmental Law Journal, 14, 3
  2. 10.1017/S0260210598000850 · doi:10.1017/s0260210598000850
  3. 10.1111/j.1536-7150.1998.tb03260.x · doi:10.1111/j.1536-7150.1998.tb03260.x
  4. 10.1177/089124395009002002 · DOI
  5. 10.1080/08941929009380728 · doi:10.1080/08941929009380728
  6. Burnham Peter, 2002, Rupert and H. Smith, 113
  7. 10.1080/01436599408420393 · doi:10.1080/01436599408420393
  8. Colás Alejandro, 2002, Rupert and H. Smith, 191
  9. Cole Luke, 1992, Ecology Law Quarterly, 19, 619
  10. Colquette Kelly M, 1991, Talane Environmental Law Journal, 5, 153
  11. Cutler Claire, 2002, Smith, 230
  12. Diegues Antonio Carlos, 1998, Goldman, 54
  13. 10.1177/03058298950240030801 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Hildyard Nicholas, 1993, Sachs, 22
  15. Keeva Steven, 1994, ABA Journal, 88
  16. Khan Farieda, 2002, McDonald, 15
  17. 10.1007/BF00990101 · DOI
  18. Lacher Hannes, 2002, Rupert and H. Smith, 147
  19. Laffey Mark, 2002, Rupert and H. Smith, 90
  20. Lazarus Neil, 1998, Race and Class, 40, 91
  21. 10.1111/j.1467-9256.1995.tb00123.x · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9256.1995.tb00123.x
  22. 10.1080/713687945 · DOI
  23. 10.1162/152638002320980632 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Lukey Peter, 2002, McDonald, 274
  25. 10.1162/152638003322068218 · doi:10.1162/152638003322068218
  26. 10.1080/096922998347426 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Perkins Jane, 1992, Clearinghouse Review, 389
  28. 10.1111/j.1467-8330.1996.tb00519.x · DOI · Paper page
  29. Robinson William I, 2002, Rupert and H. Smith, 210
  30. Ruiters Greg, 2002, McDonald, 112
  31. Rupert Mark, 2002, Rupert and H. Smith, 1
  32. Saurin Julian, 1996, Vogler and M. Imber, 77
  33. Solomon M. Scott, 2002, Rupert and H. Smith, 284
  34. 10.1177/001139297045003006 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Wood Ellen Meiskens, 2002, Rupert and H. Smith, 17

Metadata

Authors
Newell, P.
Venue
Global Environmental Politics
Published
2005-08-01
Volume
5
Issue
3
Pages
70-94
ISSN
  • 1526-3800 (ISSN-L)
  • 1536-0091
OpenAlex
W2153450142
Cited by
192
References
0
FWCI
12.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Race, Class and the Global Politics of Environmental Inequality. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1162/1526380054794835
The paper
Newell, P. (2005). Race, Class and the Global Politics of Environmental Inequality. Global Environmental Politics. https://doi.org/10.1162/1526380054794835

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.