The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Planting Trees to Mitigate Climate Change: Contested Discourses of Ecological Modernization, Green Governmentality and Civic Environmentalism
Abstract
Forest plantations or so-called carbon sinks have played a critical role in the climate change negotiations and constitute a central element in the scheme to limit atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations set out by the Kyoto Protocol. This paper examines dominant discursive framings of forest plantation projects in the climate regime. A central proposition is that these projects represent a microcosm of competing and overlapping discourses that are mirrored in debates of global environmental governance. While the win-win discourse of ecological modernization has legitimized the inclusion of sink projects in the Kyoto Protocol, a green governmentality discourse has provided the scientific rationale necessary to turn tropical tree-plantation projects operational on the emerging carbon market. A critical civic environmentalism discourse has contested forest sink projects depicting them as unjust and environmentally unsound strategies to mitigate climate change. The article examines the articulation and institutionalization of these discourses in the climate negotiation process as well as the wider implications for environmental governance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Limits to Growth: A report for the Club of Rome's Project on the Predicament of Mankind
Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., & Behrens, W. W. (1972) · doi:10.1349/ddlp.1 · Cited by 4,268
Technologies of Humility: Citizen Participation in Governing Science
Jasanoff, S. (2003) · Minerva · doi:10.1023/a:1025557512320 · Cited by 1,004
Cited by
Bäckstrand, K. (2006) · European Environment · doi:10.1002/eet.425 · Cited by 731
Self-citationAccountability of Networked Climate Governance: The Rise of Transnational Climate Partnerships
Bäckstrand, K. (2008) · Global Environmental Politics · doi:10.1162/glep.2008.8.3.74 · Cited by 441
Self-citationWhat makes climate change adaptation effective? A systematic review of the literature
Owen, G. (2020) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102071 · Cited by 412
Earth system governance: a research framework
Biermann, F., Betsill, M. M., Gupta, J., Kanie, N., Lebel, L., Liverman, D., Schroeder, H., Siebenhüner, B., & Zondervan, R. (2010) · International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics · doi:10.1007/s10784-010-9137-3 · Cited by 371
Beyond the public and private divide: remapping transnational climate governance in the 21st century
Pattberg, P., & Stripple, J. (2008) · International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics · doi:10.1007/s10784-008-9085-3 · Cited by 313
Metadata
- Authors
- Bäckstrand, K., & Lövbrand, E.
- Venue
- Global Environmental Politics
- Publisher
- MIT Press
- Published
- 2006-02-01
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 50-75
- ISSN
- 1526-3800 (ISSN-L)
- 1536-0091
- OpenAlex
- W2147888852
- Cited by
- 530
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 23.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Planting Trees to Mitigate Climate Change: Contested Discourses of Ecological Modernization, Green Governmentality and Civic Environmentalism. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1162/152638006775991911
- The paper
- Bäckstrand, K., & Lövbrand, E. (2006). Planting Trees to Mitigate Climate Change: Contested Discourses of Ecological Modernization, Green Governmentality and Civic Environmentalism. Global Environmental Politics. https://doi.org/10.1162/152638006775991911
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.