The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Accountability of Networked Climate Governance: The Rise of Transnational Climate Partnerships
Abstract
Public-private partnerships (PPP) have been advanced as a new tool of global governance, which can supply both effective and legitimate governance. In the context of recent debates on the democratic legitimacy of transnational governance, this paper focuses on accountability as a central component of legitimacy. The aim of this paper is to map transnational climate partnerships and evaluate their accountability record in terms of transparency, monitoring mechanisms and representation of stakeholders. Three types of partnerships are identified with respect to their degree of public-private interaction: public-private (hybrid), governmental and private-private. Most of the climate partnerships have functions of advocacy, service provision and implementation. None are standard setting, which indicates that governmental actors are less willing to “contract out” rule-setting authority to private actors in the climate change. Some partnerships, such as the World Summit on Sustainable Development climate partnerships and Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) projects represent “new” modes of hybrid governance with high degree of public-private interaction. However, many partnerships, not least the voluntary technology agreements such as the APP, rest on “old” form of governance based on the logic of lobbying, corporatism, co-optation and interstate bargaining. Private (business-to business) climate partnerships are to varying degrees geared toward quantitative targets in the Kyoto Protocol. The accountability record is higher for hybrid climate partnerships, such as the CDM, due to extensive reporting and monitoring mechanisms, while lower for the governmental networks, such as voluntary technology agreements. Partnerships do not necessarily replace or erode the authority of sovereign states, but rather propels the hybridization and transformation of authority that is increasingly shared between state and nonstate actors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics
Keck, M. E., & Sikkink, K. (2014) · Cornell University Press eBooks · doi:10.7591/9780801471292 · Cited by 4,627
Deliberative democracy and beyond: liberals, critics, contestations
(2001) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.38-5835 · Cited by 2,710
Democracy and the global order: from the modern state to cosmopolitan governance
(1996) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.33-6572 · Cited by 1,959
Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations
Dryzek, J. S. (2002) · doi:10.1093/019925043x.001.0001 · Cited by 1,728
Accountability and Abuses of Power in World Politics
GRANT, R. W., & KEOHANE, R. O. (2005) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055405051476 · Cited by 1,620
Legitimacy and Authority in International Politics
Hurd, I. (1999) · International Organization · doi:10.1162/002081899550913 · Cited by 1,619
Governance without Government: Order and Change in World Politics
Rosenau, J. N., & Czempiel, E. O. (2008) · Cited by 1,262
Rules for the World: International Organizations in Global Politics
Barnett, M., & Finnemore, M. (2019) · Cornell University Press eBooks · doi:10.7591/9780801465161 · Cited by 1,175
Betsill, M., & Bulkeley, H. (2003) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203219256 · Cited by 1,148
Governing through Markets: Forest Certification and the Emergence of Non-State Authority
Cashore, B. W., Auld, G. A., & Newsom, D. (2004) · Cited by 1,056
Cited by
Transnational business governance interactions: Conceptualization and framework for analysis
Eberlein, B., Abbott, K. W., Black, J., Meidinger, E., & Wood, S. (2014) · Regulation & Governance · doi:10.1111/rego.12030 · Cited by 522
Governing Climate Change: Polycentricity in Action?
(2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108284646 · Cited by 426
Beyond the public and private divide: remapping transnational climate governance in the 21st century
Pattberg, P., & Stripple, J. (2008) · International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics · doi:10.1007/s10784-008-9085-3 · Cited by 313
Hsu, A., Höhne, N., Kuramochi, T., Vilariño, V., & Sovacool, B. K. (2020) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2020.101738 · Cited by 69
Equity and Justice in Polycentric Climate Governance
Okereke, C. (2018) · Governing Climate Change · doi:10.1017/9781108284646.019 · Cited by 43
Metadata
- Authors
- Bäckstrand, K.
- Venue
- Global Environmental Politics
- Publisher
- MIT Press - Journals
- Published
- 2008-08
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 74-102
- ISSN
- 1526-3800 (ISSN-L)
- 1536-0091
- OpenAlex
- W2108217506
- Cited by
- 441
- References
- 55
- FWCI
- 69.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Accountability of Networked Climate Governance: The Rise of Transnational Climate Partnerships. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1162/glep.2008.8.3.74
- The paper
- Bäckstrand, K. (2008). Accountability of Networked Climate Governance: The Rise of Transnational Climate Partnerships. Global Environmental Politics. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep.2008.8.3.74
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.