CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 20Mentoring and Academic DevelopmentAcademic integrity and plagiarismEthics and bioethics in healthcare

On the Importance of Research Ethics and Mentoring

Faden, Ruth R., Klag, Michael J., Kass, Nancy E., Krag, Sharon S.·2002·The American Journal of Bioethics
DOI 10.1162/152651602320957565
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/152651602320957565

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • According to the Technology Acceptance Model (Shahzad et al., 2024), the advocacy for institutional policy by trusted academics has generally been shown to be a successful strategy for the adoption of technology by staff and students (Faden et al., 2002).

    “According to the Technology Acceptance Model (Shahzad et al., 2024), the advocacy for institutional policy by trusted academics has generally been shown to be a successful strategy for the adoption of technology by staff and students (Faden et al., 2002).”

    From A university framework for the responsible use of generative AI in research (2026) · cites this paper as Faden et al., 2002

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Faden, R. R., Klag, M. J., Kass, N. E., & Krag, S. S.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
ORCID
Venue
The American Journal of Bioethics
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2002-09
Volume
2
Issue
4
Pages
50-51
ISSN
  • 1526-5161 (ISSN-L)
  • 1536-0075
DOI
10.1162/152651602320957565
OpenAlex
W2047460980
Cited by
20
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The American Journal of Bioethics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mentoring and Academic Development
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Academic integrity and plagiarism
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
Keywords
research ethics, mentoring, research integrity, bioethics education
MeSH terms
Academic Medical Centers, Ethics, Professional, Mentors, Teaching, United States, Ethics, Research, Government Regulation, Federal Government, Biomedical Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review