Cited by 89Authorship Attribution and ProfilingTopic ModelingComputational and Text Analysis Methods

Authorship Attribution with Topic Models

Open access
Seroussi, Yanir, Zukerman, Ingrid, Bohnert, Fabian·2014·Computational Linguistics

Abstract

Authorship attribution deals with identifying the authors of anonymous texts. Traditionally, research in this field has focused on formal texts, such as essays and novels, but recently more attention has been given to texts generated by on-line users, such as e-mails and blogs. Authorship attribution of such on-line texts is a more challenging task than traditional authorship attribution, because such texts tend to be short, and the number of candidate authors is often larger than in traditional settings. We address this challenge by using topic models to obtain author representations. In addition to exploring novel ways of applying two popular topic models to this task, we test our new model that projects authors and documents to two disjoint topic spaces. Utilizing our model in authorship attribution yields state-of-the-art performance on several data sets, containing either formal texts written by a few authors or informal texts generated by tens to thousands of on-line users. We also present experimental results that demonstrate the applicability of topical author representations to two other problems: inferring the sentiment polarity of texts, and predicting the ratings that users would give to items such as movies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/coli_a_00173

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The challenge in social media stems from the brief nature of posts and a large pool of potential authors, making the attribution of short documents particularly difficult.

    “The challenge in social media stems from the brief nature of posts and a large pool of potential authors, making the attribution of short documents particularly difficult [Aborisade and Anwar, 2018;Seroussi et al., 2014;Theophilo et al., 2021].”

    From Authorship Attribution in the Era of LLMs: Problems, Methodologies, and Challenges (2025) · cites this paper as Seroussi et al., 2014

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 68 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Rajkumar, Arun, Saradha Ravi, Venkatasubramanian Suresh, M. Narasimha Murthy, and C. E. Veni Madhavan. 2009. Stopwords and stylometry: A latent Dirichlet allocation approach. In Proceedings of the NIPS 2009 Workshop on Applications for Topic Models: Text and Beyond (Poster Session), Whistler.
  2. Zhu, Jun, Amr Ahmed, and Eric P. Xing. 2009. MedLDA: Maximum margin supervised topic models for regression and classification. In ICML 2009: Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 1,257-1,264, Montreal.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Seroussi, Y., Zukerman, I., & Bohnert, F.
Affiliations
  • Monash University (AU)
  • Monash University
Venue
Computational Linguistics
Published
2014-06
Volume
40
Issue
2
Pages
269-310
ISSN
  • 0891-2017 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-9312
OpenAlex
W2103577799
Cited by
89
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
4.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Computational Linguistics (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Australian Research Council (LP0883416)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Authorship Attribution and Profiling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Computational and Text Analysis Methods
Keywords
authorship attribution, topic modeling, online texts, author representation, rating prediction, short text, blog posts, email

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review