Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 512

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Equation for Response to Selection and Its Use for Prediction

Mühlenbein, Heinz·1997·Evolutionary Computation

Abstract

The Breeder Genetic Algorithm (BGA) was designed according to the theories and methods used in the science of livestock breeding. The prediction of a breeding experiment is based on the response to selection (RS) equation. This equation relates the change in a population's fitness to the standard deviation of its fitness, as well as to the parameters selection intensity and realized heritability. In this paper the exact RS equation is derived for proportionate selection given an infinite population in linkage equilibrium. In linkage equilibrium the genotype frequencies are the product of the univariate marginal frequencies. The equation contains Fisher's fundamental theorem of natural selection as an approximation. The theorem shows that the response is approximately equal to the quotient of a quantity called additive genetic variance, V A, and the average fitness. We compare Mendelian two-parent recombination with gene-pool recombination, which belongs to a special class of genetic algorithms that we call univariate marginal distribution (UMD) algorithms. UMD algorithms keep the genotypes in linkage equilibrium. For UMD algorithms, an exact RS equation is proven that can be used for long-term prediction. Empirical and theoretical evidence is provided that indicates that Mendelian two-parent recombination is also mainly exploiting the additive genetic variance. We compute an exact RS equation for binary tournament selection. It shows that the two classical methods for estimating realized heritability—the regression heritability and the heritability in the narrow sense—may give poor estimates. Furthermore, realized heritability for binary tournament selection can be very different from that of proportionate selection. The paper ends with a short survey about methods that extend standard genetic algorithms and UMD algorithms by detecting interacting variables in nonlinear fitness functions and using this information to sample new points.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/evco.1997.5.3.303

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 512

Metadata

Authors
Mühlenbein, H.
Venue
Evolutionary Computation
Published
1997-09
Volume
5
Issue
3
Pages
303-346
ISSN
  • 1063-6560 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-9304
OpenAlex
W2139015486
Cited by
512
References
2
FWCI
9.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Equation for Response to Selection and Its Use for Prediction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1162/evco.1997.5.3.303
The paper
Mühlenbein, H. (1997). The Equation for Response to Selection and Its Use for Prediction. Evolutionary Computation. https://doi.org/10.1162/evco.1997.5.3.303

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.