Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 358

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Disclosure as Governance: The Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative and Resource Management in the Developing World

Haufler, Virginia·2010·Global Environmental Politics
DOI 10.1162/glep_a_00014
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The global promotion of transparency for the extractive sector—oil, gas and mining—has become increasingly accepted as an appropriate solution to weaknesses in governance in resource-rich developing nations. Proponents argue that if extractive firms disclose publicly their payments to governments, citizens will be able to hold governments accountable. This will improve the management of natural resources, reduce corruption, and mitigate conflict. These beliefs are embodied in the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI), initially a unilateral effort launched by Tony Blair that has evolved into a global program. Why has transparency become the solution of choice for managing natural resource wealth, and how has the EITI evolved? This article argues that intersecting transnational networks with complementary global norms facilitated construction of transparency as a solution for management of resource revenues. This in turn promoted the gradual expansion of the institutional architecture, membership, and scope of the EITI despite significant political barriers.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/glep_a_00014

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 50 references

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. 10.1080/13600810500099766 · doi:10.1080/13600810500099766
  2. Case David, 2005, University of Colorado Law Review, 76, 379
  3. De Jonge Oudraat Chantal, 2000, Legal and Political Conundrums, 1
  4. deSoysa Indra, 2000, Malone and Mats Berdal, 113
  5. Fenster Mark, 2005, Iowa Law Review, 91, 885
  6. Gupta Aarti, 2006, David W. Cash and Nancy M. Dickson, 57
  7. Hauºer Virginia, 2010, Martha Finnemore and Susan Sell, 102
  8. 10.1177/0010414001034004002 · doi:10.1177/0010414001034004002
  9. Ruggie John Gerard, 2004, European Journal of International Affairs, 10, 499
  10. Skjaerseth Jon Birger, 2004, FNI Report, 7, 1
  11. Westbrook David, 2004, Michigan State Law Review, 2004, 441

Cited by

See all 358

Metadata

Authors
Haufler, V.
Venue
Global Environmental Politics
Publisher
MIT Press - Journals
Published
2010-08
Volume
10
Issue
3
Pages
53-73
ISSN
  • 1526-3800 (ISSN-L)
  • 1536-0091
DOI
10.1162/glep_a_00014
OpenAlex
W1972924824
Cited by
358
References
50
FWCI
28.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Disclosure as Governance: The Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative and Resource Management in the Developing World. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1162/glep_a_00014
The paper
Haufler, V. (2010). Disclosure as Governance: The Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative and Resource Management in the Developing World. Global Environmental Politics. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep_a_00014

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.