The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers in the Twenty-first Century: China's Rise and the Fate of America's Global Position
Abstract
Unipolarity is arguably the most popular concept used to analyze the U.S. global position that emerged in 1991, but the concept is totally inadequate for assessing how that position has changed in the years since. A new framework that avoids unipolarity's conceptual pitfalls and provides a systematic approach to measuring how the distribution of capabilities is changing in twenty-first-century global politics demonstrates that the United States will long remain the only state with the capability to be a superpower. In addition, China is in a class by itself, one that the unipolarity concept cannot explain. To assess the speed with which China's rise might transform this into something other than a one-superpower system, analogies from past power transitions are misleading. Unlike past rising powers, China is at a much lower technological level than the leading state, and the gap separating Chinese and U.S. military capabilities is much larger than it was in the past. In addition, the very nature of power has changed: the greatly enhanced difficulty of converting economic capacity into military capacity makes the transition from a great power to a superpower much harder now than it was in the past. Still, China's rise is real and change is afoot.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Increasing returns and long-run growth
Romer, P. M. (1986) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/261420 · Cited by 20,149
Endogenous Technological Change
Romer, P. (1989) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w3210 · Cited by 13,303
The tragedy of Great Power politics
(2002) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.39-5464 · Cited by 3,594
The rise and fall of the great powers
Kennedy, P. (1988) · Business Horizons · doi:10.1016/0007-6813(88)90030-4 · Cited by 1,366
Structural Realism after the Cold War
Waltz, K. N. (2000) · International Security · doi:10.1162/016228800560372 · Cited by 1,339
The Stability of a Unipolar World
Wohlforth, W. C. (1999) · International Security · doi:10.1162/016228899560031 · Cited by 1,241
Self-citationThe Emerging Structure of International Politics
Waltz, K. N. (1993) · International Security · doi:10.2307/2539097 · Cited by 1,196
Jacquemin, H. (1977) · The Military Law and the Law of War Review · doi:10.4337/mllwr.1977.04.38 · Cited by 1,174
Krauthammer, C. (1990) · Foreign Affairs · doi:10.2307/20044692 · Cited by 904
The Unipolar Illusion: Why New Great Powers Will Rise
Layne, C. (1993) · International Security · doi:10.2307/2539020 · Cited by 777
Cited by
“The persistent myth of lost hegemony,” revisited: structural power as a complex network phenomenon
Winecoff, W. K. (2020) · European Journal of International Relations · doi:10.1177/1354066120952876 · Cited by 89
Metadata
- Authors
- Brooks, S. G., & Wohlforth, W. C.
- Venue
- International Security
- Publisher
- MIT Press
- Published
- 2016-01
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 7-53
- ISSN
- 0162-2889 (ISSN-L)
- 1531-4804
- OpenAlex
- W2258622512
- Cited by
- 386
- References
- 36
- FWCI
- 166.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers in the Twenty-first Century: China's Rise and the Fate of America's Global Position. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1162/isec_a_00225
- The paper
- Brooks, S. G., & Wohlforth, W. C. (2016). The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers in the Twenty-first Century: China's Rise and the Fate of America's Global Position. International Security. https://doi.org/10.1162/isec_a_00225
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.