The DOI matches its Crossref record.
How Is Entrepreneurship Good for Economic Growth?
Open accessAbstract
How is entrepreneurship good for economic growth?This question would seem to have a simple answer: Entrepreneurs create new businesses, and new businesses in turn create jobs, intensify competition, and may even increase productivity through technological change.High measured levels of entrepreneurship will thus translate directly into high levels of economic growth.However, the reality is more complicated.If, by entrepreneurship, one allows inclusion of any type of informal self-employment, then high levels of entrepreneurship may actually mean either that there are substantial bureaucratic barriers to formally creating a new business, or simply that the economy is creating too few conventional wage-earning job opportunities.Under these circumstances, we might reasonably hypothesize that high levels of entrepreneurship would correlate with slow economic growth and lagging development.For the past two years I have been the chair of the research committee of a multi-country survey effort known as the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM) project, which has begun to make headway in understanding how different types of entrepreneurship affect development.The starting point has been to distinguish "necessity entrepreneurship," which is having to become an entrepreneur because you have no better option, from "opportunity entrepreneurship," which is an active choice to start a new enterprise based on the perception that an unexploited or underexploited business opportunity exists.Analyzing data gathered by GEM researchers in 11 countries, Atilla Varga and I have found that effects on economic growth and development of necessity and opportunity entrepreneurship vary greatly.We found that necessity entrepreneurship has no effect on economic development while opportunity entrepreneurship has a positive and significant effect. 1 After the fall of the Berlin Wall many uneconomical factories were closed in Central Europe as economies became integrated into the global economy.Those workers who had jobs in the plants and factories of the former socialist countries were productive members of society.However, as factories were closed one after another, many of these workers found them- Zoltan Acs
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Influence of Formal and Informal Institutional Voids on Entrepreneurship
Webb, J. W., Khoury, T. A., & Hitt, M. A. (2020) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1177/1042258719830310 · Cited by 411
How different formal institutions affect opportunity and necessity entrepreneurship
Fuentelsaz, L., González, C., Maícas, J. P., & Montero, J. (2015) · BRQ Business Research Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.brq.2015.02.001 · Cited by 237
The opportunity not taken: The occupational identity of entrepreneurs in contexts of poverty
Slade Shantz, A., Kistruck, G., & Zietsma, C. (2018) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.02.003 · Cited by 202
Szerb, L., Lafuente, E., Horváth, K., & Páger, B. (2019) · Regional Studies · doi:10.1080/00343404.2018.1510481 · Cited by 198
Skills and knowledge-based entrepreneurship: evidence from US cities
Qian, H. (2017) · Regional Studies · doi:10.1080/00343404.2016.1213383 · Cited by 44
Metadata
- Authors
- Acs, Z.
- Venue
- Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization
- Publisher
- MIT Press - Journals
- Published
- 2006-01
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 97-107
- ISSN
- 1558-2477 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-2485
- OpenAlex
- W2104347139
- Cited by
- 932
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 32.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.