The DOI matches its Crossref record; 117 of the 117 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The opportunity not taken: The occupational identity of entrepreneurs in contexts of poverty
Abstract
Innovative entrepreneurship is an essential but often missing outcome of poverty alleviation efforts. This qualitative study set in rural Ghana explores the occupational identity of entrepreneurs, the institutions that shape it in isolated “island networks”, and how it influences entrepreneurs' practices and decisions. We find that the institutional forces of “collectivism” and “fatalism” feature prominently. Being an entrepreneur in such settings means being a mentor, market link, and community safety net, and the types of opportunities entrepreneurs pursue are largely seen as pre-destined and inherited rather than individually chosen. As a result, the pursuit of innovative opportunities may be significantly limited.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“One major obstacle to the effectiveness of training programs in Africa, as well as other emerging market contexts, seems to be the inability of training programs to help necessity entrepreneurs break out of habitual routines and engage in new activities to aid their business (Alvarez & Barney, 2013;Shantz et al., 2018).”
From The impact of growth mindset training on entrepreneurial action among necessity entrepreneurs: Evidence from a randomized control trial (2023) · cites this paper as Shantz et al., 2018
Citations
Cites
Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks
Watts, D. J., & Strogatz, S. H. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/30918 · Cited by 43,060
The Discovery of Grounded Theory; Strategies for Qualitative Research
Glaser, B. G., Strauss, A. L., & Strutzel, E. (1968) · Nursing Research · doi:10.1097/00006199-196807000-00014 · Cited by 39,449
(1998) · Sage eBooks · Cited by 38,631
Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/226550 · Cited by 28,308
The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2017) · Aldine (Routledge reprint) · doi:10.4324/9780203793206 · Cited by 25,789
Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance
Munger, M. C., & North, D. C. (1991) · Southern Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/1060065 · Cited by 24,871
The Promise of Enterpreneurship as a Field of Research
Shane, S. A., & Venkataraman, S. (2000) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2000.2791611 · Cited by 13,599
Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research: Notes on the Gioia Methodology
Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. (2013) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428112452151 · Cited by 13,227
Institutions and organizations
(1995) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.33-1848 · Cited by 8,025
(1934) · SSRN Electronic Journal · Cited by 7,609
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Scott, 1995, Vol. 2
Cited by
The Influence of Formal and Informal Institutional Voids on Entrepreneurship
Webb, J. W., Khoury, T. A., & Hitt, M. A. (2020) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1177/1042258719830310 · Cited by 411
Neumeyer, X., Santos, S. C., & Morris, M. H. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management · doi:10.1109/tem.2020.2989740 · Cited by 373
Entrepreneurial Identity: A Review and Research Agenda
Radu-Lefebvre, M., Lefèbvre, V., Crosina, E., & Hytti, U. (2021) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1177/10422587211013795 · Cited by 326
Van Burg, E., Cornelissen, J., Stam, W., & Jack, S. (2022) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1177/1042258720943051 · Cited by 259
A review of and future agenda for research on identity in entrepreneurship
Mmbaga, N. A., Mathias, B. D., Williams, D. W., & Cardon, M. S. (2020) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2020.106049 · Cited by 250
Metadata
- Authors
- Slade Shantz, A., Kistruck, G., & Zietsma, C.
- Affiliations
- York University (CA)
- Pennsylvania State University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Business Venturing
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-07
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 416-437
- ISSN
- 0883-9026 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2793537636
- Cited by
- 202
- References
- 117
- Citations by year
- 2026: 23 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 3
- FWCI
- 21.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal of Business Venturing (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (752-2016-2652)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Business and International Management › Innovation and Socioeconomic Development
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy
- Keywords
- entrepreneurial identity, poverty reduction, rural entrepreneurship, collectivism, fatalism, social networks, mentoring, market linkages, community safety net, innovative entrepreneurship, Ghana
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The opportunity not taken: The occupational identity of entrepreneurs in contexts of poverty. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.02.003
- The paper
- Slade Shantz, A., Kistruck, G., & Zietsma, C. (2018). The opportunity not taken: The occupational identity of entrepreneurs in contexts of poverty. Journal of Business Venturing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.02.003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.