The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Changing Metabolism of Cities
Abstract
Data from urban metabolism studies from eight metropolitan regions across five continents, conducted in various years since 1965, are assembled in consistent units and compared. Together with studies of water, materials, energy, and nutrient flows from additional cities, the comparison provides insights into the changing metabolism of cities. Most cities studied exhibit increasing per capita metabolism with respect to water, wastewater, energy, and materials, although one city showed increasing efficiency for energy and water over the 1990s. Changes in solid waste streams and air pollutant emissions are mixed. The review also identifies metabolic processes that threaten the sustainability of cities. These include altered ground water levels, exhaustion of local materials, accumulation of toxic materials, summer heat islands, and irregular accumulation of nutrients. Beyond concerns over the sheer magnitudes of resource flows into cities, an understanding of these accumulation or storage processes in the urban metabolism is critical. Growth , which is inherently part of metabolism, causes changes in water stored in urban aquifers, materials in the building stock, heat stored in the urban canopy layer, and potentially useful nutrients in urban waste dumps. Practical reasons exist for understanding urban metabolism. The vitality of cities depends on spatial relationships with surrounding hinterlands and global resource webs. Increasing metabolism implies greater loss of farmland, forests, and species diversity; plus more traffic and more pollution. Urban policy makers should consider to what extent their nearest resources are close to exhaustion and, if necessary, appropriate strategies to slow exploitation. It is apparent from this review that metabolism data have been established for only a few cities worldwide, and interpretation issues exist due to lack of common conventions. Further urban metabolism studies are required.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Defining urban resilience: A review
Meerow, S., Newell, J. P., & Stults, M. (2016) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011 · Cited by 3,276
The emergence of circular economy: a new framing around prolonging resource productivity
Blomsma, F., & Brennan, G. (2017) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1111/jiec.12603 · Cited by 1,383
A review of earthworm impact on soil function and ecosystem services
Blouin, M., Hodson, M. E., Delgado, E. A., Baker, G., Brussaard, L., Butt, K. R., Dai, J., Dendooven, L., Peres, G., Tondoh, J. E., et al. (2013) · European Journal of Soil Science · doi:10.1111/ejss.12025 · Cited by 1,307
Appio, F. P., Lima, M., & Paroutis, S. (2019) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2018.12.018 · Cited by 747
Plant factories versus greenhouses: Comparison of resource use efficiency
Graamans, L., Baeza, E., van den Dobbelsteen, A., Tsafaras, I., & Stanghellini, C. (2018) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2017.11.003 · Cited by 539
Metadata
- Authors
- Kennedy, C., Cuddihy, J., & Engel‐Yan, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Industrial Ecology
- Published
- 2007-04
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 43-59
- ISSN
- 1088-1980 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-9290
- OpenAlex
- W2147828940
- Cited by
- 1,262
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 27.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Changing Metabolism of Cities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1162/jie.2007.1107
- The paper
- Kennedy, C., Cuddihy, J., & Engel‐Yan, J. (2007). The Changing Metabolism of Cities. Journal of Industrial Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1162/jie.2007.1107
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.