CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 747Smart Cities and TechnologiesInnovative Approaches in Technology and Social DevelopmentSustainable Urban and Rural Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Understanding Smart Cities: Innovation ecosystems, technological advancements, and societal challenges

Appio, Francesco Paolo, Lima, Marcos, Paroutis, Sotirios·2019·Technological Forecasting and Social Change
DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.12.018
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.12.018

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • From 17 pieces of literature, only 1 piece did not discuss smart cities, while 2 pieces discussed livable cities supporting smart cities.

    “From 17 pieces of literature, we found that only 1 piece of literature did not discuss smart cities, while 2 pieces of literature discussed livable cities supporting smart cities [26,27].”

    From Initial Cybersecurity Framework in the New Capital City of Indonesia: Factors, Objectives, and Technology (2022) · cites this paper as [27]

    Section 4 (‘Quality of life in smart cities’) and Section 4.2 (‘Smart Living’) discuss how smart-city initiatives can improve residents’ quality of life, so the paper fits the cited topic broadly. They do not establish the more specific characterization that livable cities support smart cities. The tally of 17 pieces is presented as the citing authors’ own finding, not as a finding attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • Livability is an issue in smart cities related to the focus of smart city development on quality of life and innovation ecosystems.

    “Livability is an issue in smart cities related to the focus of smart city development on quality of life and innovation ecosystems [27].”

    From Initial Cybersecurity Framework in the New Capital City of Indonesia: Factors, Objectives, and Technology (2022) · cites this paper as [27]

  • The information technologies for IKN cybersecurity are risk assessment, big data, governance, awareness, blockchain, biometrics, machine learning, cryptography, network security, artificial intelligence, and intrusion detection.

    “| 1 | Risk Assessment | [26-28] |”

    From Initial Cybersecurity Framework in the New Capital City of Indonesia: Factors, Objectives, and Technology (2022) · cites this paper as [27]

    Section 6, “Towards a research agenda” (page unavailable), discusses smart-city risks, including cyberattacks, and proposes studying the risks and benefits of smart-city initiatives. A search for “risk assessment” and “cybersecurity” found no passage identifying risk assessment as a cybersecurity technology for IKN. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 76

  1. Abbate, 2018, Business models for developing smart cities. A fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis of an IoT platform, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang.
  2. Albino, 2015, Smart cities: definitions, dimensions, performance, and initiatives, J. Urban Technol., 22, 1, 10.1080/10630732.2014.942092 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Al-Hader, 2009, The smart city infrastructure development & monitoring, Theoretical Empirica., 4, 87
  4. Almirall, 2016, Smart cities at the crossroads: new tensions in city transformation, Calif. Manag. Rev., 59, 141, 10.1177/0008125616683949 · DOI
  5. Amer, 2018, Centralized simulated annealing for alleviating vehicular congestion in smart cities, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang.
  6. Andreani, 2018, Reframing technologically enhanced urban scenarios: a design research model towards human centered smart cities, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang.
  7. Angelidou, 2015, Smart cities: a conjuncture of four forces, Cities, 47, 95, 10.1016/j.cities.2015.05.004 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Appio, 2014, Visualizing the structure and bridges of the intellectual property management and strategy literature: a document co-citation analysis, Scientometrics, 101, 623, 10.1007/s11192-014-1329-0 · DOI
  9. Appio, 2016, Unveiling the intellectual origins of Social Media-based innovation: insights from a bibliometric approach, Scientometrics, 108, 355, 10.1007/s11192-016-1955-9 · DOI
  10. Appio, 2017, Collaborative network of firms: antecedents and state-of-the-art properties, Int. J. Prod. Res., 55, 211, 10.1080/00207543.2016.1262083 · DOI
  11. Appio, 2017, Search mechanisms and innovation: an analysis across multiple perspectives, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., 120, 103, 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.04.008 · DOI
  12. Ardito, 2018, The role of universities in the knowledge Management of Smart City Projects, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang.
  13. Bednarek, 2017, Transcendence through rhetorical practices: responding to paradox in the science sector, Organ. Stud., 38, 77, 10.1177/0170840616655486 · DOI
  14. Brock, 2018, Light the way for smart cities: lessons from Philips Lighting, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang.
  15. Burgelman, 2018, Strategy processes and practices: dialogues and intersections, Strateg. Manag. J., 39, 531, 10.1002/smj.2741 · DOI
  16. Camboim, 2018, Driving elements to make cities smarter: evidences from European projects, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang.
  17. Caragliu, 2018, Smart innovative cities: the impact of Smart City policies on urban innovation, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang.
  18. Coleman, 1988, Social capital in the creation of human capital, Am. J. Sociol., 94, S95, 10.1086/228943 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Contreras, 2018, Economic and policy uncertainty in climate change mitigation: the London Smart City case scenario, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang.
  20. Corsini, 2018, Participatory energy: research, imaginaries and practices on people' contribute to energy systems in the smart city, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang.
  21. Dameri, 2018, Understanding smart cities as a glocal strategy: a comparison between Italy and China, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang.
  22. Dameri, 2017, Leveraging smart city projects for benefitting citizens: the role of ICTs, vol. 125
  23. Desdemoustier, 2018, Municipalities' understanding of the Smart City concept: an exploratory analysis in Belgium, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang.
  24. Dupont, 2018, Understanding user representations, a new development path for supporting Smart City policy: evaluation of the electric car use in Lorraine Region, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang.
  25. Engelbert, 2018, Excluding citizens from the European smart city: the discourse practices of pursuing and granting smartness, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang.
  26. Escolar, 2018, A multiple-attribute decision making-based approach for Smart City rankings design, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang.
  27. Glanzel, 2011, Using ‘core documents’ for the representation of clusters and topics, Scientometrics, 88, 297, 10.1007/s11192-011-0347-4 · DOI
  28. Grimaldi, 2015, The alignment of University curricula with the building of a smart city: a case study from Barcelona, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., 123, 298, 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.03.011 · DOI
  29. Grimaldi, 2018, Heuristic for the localization of new shops based on business and social criteria, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang.
  30. Hamidi, 2018, The relationship between regional compactness and regional innovation capacity (RIC): empirical evidence from a national study, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang.
  31. Harrison, 2010, Foundations for smarter cities, IBM J. Res. Dev., 54, 1, 10.1147/JRD.2010.2048257 · DOI
  32. Hopkins, 2018, Investigating ‘anywhere working’ as a mechanism for alleviating traffic congestion in smart cities, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang.
  33. Hutchison, 2011, Ukraine's global strategy in the post-crisis economy: developing an intelligent nation to achieve a competitive advantage, Innov. Market., 7, 46
  34. Ijaz, 2016, Smart cities: a survey on security concerns, Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl., 7, 612
  35. Jamil, 2015, Smart environment monitoring system by employing wireless sensor networks on vehicles for pollution free smart cities, Procedia Eng., 107, 480, 10.1016/j.proeng.2015.06.106 · DOI
  36. Kennedy, 2007, The changing metabolism of cities, J. Ind. Ecol., 11, 43, 10.1162/jie.2007.1107 · DOI
  37. Kennedy, 2011, The study of urban metabolism and its applications to urban planning and design, Environ. Pollut., 159, 1965, 10.1016/j.envpol.2010.10.022 · DOI
  38. Kitchin, 2014, The real-time city? Big data and smart urbanism, GeoJournal, 79, 1, 10.1007/s10708-013-9516-8 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Knight, 2017, Becoming salient: the TMT leader's role in shaping the interpretive context of paradoxical tensions, Organ. Stud., 38, 403, 10.1177/0170840616640844 · DOI
  40. Kraus, 2015, Innovating and exploiting entrepreneurial opportunities in smart cities: evidence from Germany, Creat. Innov. Manag., 24, 601, 10.1111/caim.12154 · DOI
  41. Kretschmer, 2016, Generational transitions in platform markets—the role of backward compatibility, Strategy Sci., 1, 90, 10.1287/stsc.2015.0009 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Kumaraswamy, 2018, Perspectives on disruptive innovations, J. Manag. Stud., 55, 1025, 10.1111/joms.12399 · DOI
  43. Lee, 2014, Towards an effective framework for building smart cities: lessons from Seoul and San Francisco, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., 89, 80, 10.1016/j.techfore.2013.08.033 · DOI
  44. Lewis, 2000, Exploring paradox: toward a more comprehensive guide, Acad. Manag. Rev., 25, 760, 10.2307/259204 · DOI
  45. Lex, 2018, A cross-disciplinary path to healthy and energy efficient buildings, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang.
  46. Leydesdorff, 2011, The triple-helix model of smart cities: a neo-evolutionary perspective, J. Urban Technol., 18, 53, 10.1080/10630732.2011.601111 · DOI
  47. Lim, 2018, Smart cities with big data: reference models, challenges, and considerations, Cities, 82, 86, 10.1016/j.cities.2018.04.011 · DOI
  48. Lindkvist, 2018, Intermediaries for knowledge transfer in integrated energy planning of urban districts, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang.
  49. Marsal-Llacuna, 2015, Lessons in urban monitoring taken from sustainable and livable cities to better address the smart cities initiative, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., 90, 611, 10.1016/j.techfore.2014.01.012 · DOI · Paper page
  50. Mora, 2018, Combining co-citation clustering and text-based analysis to reveal the main development paths of smart cities, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang.
  51. Mora, 2018, Strategic principles for Smart City development: a multiple case study analysis of European best practices, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang.
  52. Moustaka, 2018, Enhancing social networking in smart cities: privacy and security borderlines, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang.
  53. Neirotti, 2014, Current trends in smart city initiatives: some stylized facts, Cities, 38, 25, 10.1016/j.cities.2013.12.010 · DOI · Paper page
  54. Nielsen, 2018, Identifying and supporting exploratory and exploitative models of innovation in municipal urban planning; key challenges from seven Norwegian energy ambitious neighborhood pilots, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang.
  55. Nilssen, 2018, To the smart city and beyond? Developing a typology of smart urban innovation, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang.
  56. Ning, 2017, Vehicular social networks: enabling smart mobility, IEEE Commun. Mag., 55, 16, 10.1109/MCOM.2017.1600263 · DOI
  57. Papachroni, 2016, In pursuit of ambidexterity: managerial reactions to innovation-efficiency tensions, Hum. Relat., 69, 1791, 10.1177/0018726715625343 · DOI
  58. Paroutis, 2014, A strategic view on smart city technology: the case of IBM Smarter Cities during a recession, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., 89, 262, 10.1016/j.techfore.2013.08.041 · DOI
  59. Perera, 2014, Sensing as a service model for smart cities supported by internet of things, Trans. Emerg. Telecommun. Technol., 25, 81, 10.1002/ett.2704 · DOI · Paper page
  60. Ramaswami, 2016, Meta-principles for developing smart, sustainable, and healthy cities, Science, 352, 940, 10.1126/science.aaf7160 · DOI
  61. Ruhlandt, 2018, The governance of smart cities: a systematic literature review, Cities, 81, 1, 10.1016/j.cities.2018.02.014 · DOI
  62. Schaffers, 2011, Smart cities and the future internet: Towards cooperation frameworks for open innovation, vol. 6656
  63. Schiavone, 2018, Business model innovation for urban smartization, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang.
  64. Sepasgozar, 2018, Implementing citizen centric technology in developing smart cities: a model for predicting the acceptance of urban technologies, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang.
  65. Shapiro, 2006, Smart cities: quality of life, productivity, and the growth effects of human capital, Rev. Econ. Stat., 88, 324, 10.1162/rest.88.2.324 · DOI
  66. Smith, 2014, Dynamic decision making: a model of senior leaders managing strategic paradoxes, Acad. Manag. J., 57, 1592, 10.5465/amj.2011.0932 · DOI
  67. Söderström, 2014, Smart cities as corporate storytelling, City, 18, 307, 10.1080/13604813.2014.906716 · DOI
  68. Stratigea, 2015, Tools and technologies for planning the development of smart cities, J. Urban Technol., 22, 43, 10.1080/10630732.2015.1018725 · DOI
  69. Suzuki, 2017, Smart cities IoT: enablers and technology road map, vol. 125
  70. Tanguy, 2018, Measuring the extent to which Londoners are willing to pay for public art in their city, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang.
  71. Trencher, 2018, Towards the smart city 2.0: empirical evidence of using smartness as a tool for tackling social challenges, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang.
  72. Van den Buuse, 2018, An exploration of smart city approaches by international ICT firms, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang.
  73. Van der Graaf, 2018, Navigating platform urbanism, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang.
  74. Washburn, 2009, Helping CIOs understand “smart city” initiatives, Growth, 17, 1
  75. Yu, 2018, Towards a service-dominant platform for public value co-creation in a smart city: evidence from two metropolitan cities in China, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang.
  76. Zygiaris, 2013, Smart city reference model: Assisting planners to conceptualize the building of smart city innovation ecosystems, J. Knowl. Econ., 4, 217, 10.1007/s13132-012-0089-4 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Appio, F. P., Lima, M., & Paroutis, S.
Affiliations
  • Pôle Léonard de Vinci (FR)
  • SKEMA Business School (FR)
  • University of Warwick (GB)
Corresponding author
Appio, Francesco Paolo
ORCID
Venue
Technological Forecasting and Social Change
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-05
Volume
142
Pages
1-14
ISSN
0040-1625 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.techfore.2018.12.018
OpenAlex
W2905872491
Cited by
747
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 75 · 2025: 136 · 2024: 118 · 2023: 135 · 2022: 93 · 2021: 102 · 2020: 59 · 2019: 29
FWCI
79.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • Technological Forecasting and Social Change (publishedVersion)
  • Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick) (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Smart Cities and Technologies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Sustainable Urban and Rural Development
Keywords
smart cities, innovation ecosystems, technological progress, societal challenges, public services, quality of life, research agenda, hybrid framework, urban governance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review