Cited by 112Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurological disorders and treatmentsNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Deficits in selective attention following bilateral anterior cingulotomy

Janer, Kevin W., Pardo, José V.·1991·Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Abstract

Positron emission tomographic (PET) studies of normal humans undergoing specific cognitive activation paradigms have identified a region of the anterior cingulate cortex as a component of an anterior, midline attentional system involved in high-level processing selection. However, deficits in attention have not been demonstrated in patients following bilateral anterior cingulotomy, a procedure that results in lesions of adjacent anterior cingulate cortex. Task paradigms used in PET studies that recruit the anterior cingulate cortex were applied to normal, control subjects and to a patient before and after cingulotomy to provide highly sensitive and functionally targeted reaction time measures of attentional performance. In contrast to unchanged performance in several neuropsychological measures, this patient demonstrated specific deficits in attention during the subacute postoperative period, which resolved spontaneously several months after surgery. Such impairment is consistent with the evolving view of the anterior cingulate's involvement in high-level processing selection. These data show the feasibility of using information from PET activation studies of normals in the design of novel chronometric tasks useful for probing abnormalities in specific cognitive operations associated with discrete cortical regions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/jocn.1991.3.3.231

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The discovery of selective deficits in attention and cognitive control after cingulotomy points to a contribution of the cingulum to executive tasks.

    “The discovery of selective deficits in attention and cognitive control also points to a contribution to executive tasks (Cohen et al., 1999a,b; Janer and Pardo, 1991).”

    From The cingulum bundle: Anatomy, function, and dysfunction (2018) · cites this paper as Janer and Pardo, 1991

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 30 · Cited by 112

Authors
Janer, K. W., & Pardo, J. V.
Affiliations
Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Venue
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
Published
1991
Volume
3
Issue
3
Pages
231-241
ISSN
  • 0898-929X (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-8898
OpenAlex
W2027576910
Cited by
112
References
30
Citations by year
2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
selective attention, anterior cingulotomy, anterior cingulate cortex, reaction time

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review