The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Spatial Transformations in the Parietal Cortex Using Basis Functions
Abstract
Sensorimotor transformations are nonlinear mappings of sensory inputs to motor responses. We explore here the possibility that the responses of single neurons in the parietal cortex serve as basis functions for these transformations. Basis function decomposition is a general method for approximating nonlinear functions that is computationally efficient and well suited for adaptive modification. In particular, the responses of single parietal neurons can be approximated by the product of a Gaussian function of retinal location and a sigmoid function of eye position, called a gain field. A large set of such functions forms a basis set that can be used to perform an arbitrary motor response through a direct projection. We compare this hypothesis with other approaches that are commonly used to model population codes, such as computational maps and vectorial representations. Neither of these alternatives can fully account for the responses of parietal neurons, and they are computationally less efficient for nonlinear transformations. Basis functions also have the advantage of not depending on any coordinate system or reference frame. As a consequence, the position of an object can be represented in multiple reference frames simultaneously, a property consistent with the behavior of hemineglect patients with lesions in the parietal cortex.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators
Hornik, K., Stinchcombe, M., & White, H. (1989) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/0893-6080(89)90020-8 · Cited by 21,728
Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex
Felleman, D. J., & Van Essen, D. C. (1991) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/1.1.1 · Cited by 7,783
Visual and Eye Movement Functions of the Posterior Parietal Cortex
Andersen, R. A. (1989) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.12.030189.002113 · Cited by 382
Spatial maps for the control of movement.
Graziano, M. S., & Gross, C. G. (1998) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/s0959-4388(98)80140-2 · Cited by 323
Cited by
Computational modelling of visual attention
Itti, L., & Koch, C. (2001) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/35058500 · Cited by 4,733
Remembering the past and imagining the future: A neural model of spatial memory and imagery.
Byrne, P., Becker, S., & Burgess, N. (2007) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.114.2.340 · Cited by 1,011
Gain Modulation from Background Synaptic Input
Chance, F. S., Abbott, L. F., & Reyes, A. D. (2002) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00820-6 · Cited by 1,012
Why neurons mix: high dimensionality for higher cognition
Fusi, S., Miller, E. K., & Rigotti, M. (2016) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2016.01.010 · Cited by 766
Zhang, K., Ginzburg, I., McNaughton, B. L., & Sejnowski, T. J. (1998) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1998.79.2.1017 · Cited by 741
Metadata
- Authors
- Pouget, A., & Sejnowski, T. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
- Publisher
- MIT Press - Journals
- Published
- 1997-03-01
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 222-237
- ISSN
- 0898-929X (ISSN-L)
- 1530-8898
- OpenAlex
- W2055373425
- Cited by
- 425
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 7.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Spatial Transformations in the Parietal Cortex Using Basis Functions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1162/jocn.1997.9.2.222
- The paper
- Pouget, A., & Sejnowski, T. J. (1997). Spatial Transformations in the Parietal Cortex Using Basis Functions. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.1997.9.2.222
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.