When things are better or worse than expected: the medial frontal cortex and the allocation of processing resources
Abstract
Access to limited-capacity neural systems of cognitive control must be restricted to the most relevant information. How the brain identifies and selects items for preferential processing is not fully understood. Anatomical models often place the selection mechanism in the medial frontal cortex (MFC), and one computational model proposes that the mesotelencephalic dopamine (DA) system, via its reward prediction properties, provides a "gate" through which information gains access to limited-capacity systems. There is a medial frontal event-related potential (ERP) index of attention selection, the anterior positivity (P2a), associated with DA reward system input to the MFC for the identification of task-relevant perceptual representations. The P2a has a similar spatio-temporal distribution as the medial frontal negativity (MFN), elicited to error responses or choices resulting in monetary loss. The MFN has also been linked to DA projections to the MFC but for action monitoring rather than attention selection. This study proposes that the P2a and the MFN reflect the same MFC evaluation function and use a passive reward prediction design containing neither instructed attention nor response to demonstrate that the ERP over medial frontal leads at the P2a/MFN latency is consistent with activity of midbrain DA neurons, positive to unpredicted rewards and negative when a predicted reward is withheld. This result suggests that MFC activity is regulated by DA reward system input and may function to identify items or actions that exceed or fail to meet motivational prediction.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A frontocentral P2a component was observed in response to feedback stimuli.
“Instead, a frontocentral P2a component was observed, which has only recently been described to occur in response to feedback stimuli (Potts et al., 2006; Van Meel et al., 2005).”
From Error and feedback processing in children with ADHD and children with Autistic Spectrum Disorder: An EEG event-related potential study (2008) · cites this paper as Potts et al., 2006
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 43 · Cited by 316
- Authors
- Potts, G. F., Martin, L. E., Burton, P., & Montague, P. R.
- Affiliations
- Rice University (US)
- Baylor College of Medicine (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
- Publisher
- MIT Press - Journals
- Published
- 2006-07-01
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1112-1119
- ISSN
- 0898-929X (ISSN-L)
- 1530-8898
- OpenAlex
- W2041492340
- Cited by
- 316
- References
- 43
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 5.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida) (submittedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- VTechWorks (Virginia Tech) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA014073, R01-DA11723, R01-DA14073, R01DA011723)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS045790)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Keywords
- medial frontal cortex, dopaminergic reward system, reward prediction, selective attention, medial frontal negativity, event-related potentials, cognitive control, processing resource allocation, action monitoring, error response, midbrain dopaminergic neurons
- MeSH terms
- Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Frontal Lobe, Humans, Photic Stimulation, Reward, Feedback, Psychological
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review