Error and feedback processing in children with ADHD and children with Autistic Spectrum Disorder: An EEG event-related potential study
Open accessAbstract
Objective Performance monitoring was investigated in typically developing (TD) children, children with Autistic Spectrum Disorder (ASD), and Methylphenidate (Mph)-treated and medication-free children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD).Methods Subjects performed a feedback-based learning task. Event-related Potentials (ERPs) time locked to responses and feedback were derived from the EEG.Results Compared to the TD and ASD groups, the medication-free ADHD group showed a decreased response-locked Error Related Negativity (ERN) and error Positivity (Pe), particularly as learning progressed throughout the task. Compared to the medication-free ADHD group, the Methylphenidate-treated group showed a normalised Pe. All clinical groups showed or tended to show a decreased feedback-locked late positive potential to negative feedback.Conclusions The ERPs suggest that medication-free children with ADHD, but not with ASD, have a diminished capacity to monitor their error responses when they are learning by performance feedback. This capacity partially 'normalises' in Mph-treated children with ADHD. Both children with ADHD and children with ASD are suggested being compromised in affective feedback processing.Significance This study shows that measuring ERPs of error and feedback processing is a useful method for (1) dissociating ADHD from ASD and (2) elucidating medication effects in ADHD on component processes of performance monitoring.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
In 10- to 12-year-old children, medication-free ADHD was associated with reduced response-locked ERN and Pe during feedback-based learning, while ASD did not show this response-monitoring deficit. Methylphenidate-treated ADHD showed a normalised Pe, and both ADHD and ASD groups showed evidence of altered late feedback processing.
Key findings
- Medication-free children with ADHD had decreased response-locked ERN and Pe amplitudes compared with typically developing (TD) children and children with ASD, particularly as learning progressed; the ASD group did not differ from TD children on ERN or Pe.
- Methylphenidate-treated children with ADHD showed a normalised Pe amplitude and larger learning effects on the Pe than medication-free ADHD children, but Mph did not modulate the ERN.
- All clinical groups showed or tended to show a decreased feedback-locked late positive potential to negative feedback; the TD group showed an increased late positivity to negative versus positive feedback, which was attenuated in the ASD and Mph-treated ADHD groups.
- On the probabilistic learning task, TD children had higher overall accuracy than all clinical groups, but all groups increased accuracy across quartiles with no group difference in learning rate; medication-free ADHD children had more variable correct reaction times and a smaller incorrect-versus-correct RT difference than other groups.
Methods
- Seventy-two 10- to 12-year-old children were studied: TD (n = 18), medication-free ADHD (n = 18), methylphenidate-treated ADHD (n = 17), and ASD (n = 19; PDDNOS). ADHD was combined type; ASD children had PDDNOS and all were medication-free at testing.
- Children performed a probabilistic feedback-based learning task with 9 blocks of 96 trials (864 total), using informative and uninformative feedback conditions; EEG was recorded from 21 electrodes, and ERPs were time-locked to responses and feedback.
- Analyses used repeated measures ANOVAs with group as between-subjects factor and task section/quartile, response type or feedback valence, and electrode position as within-subjects factors; post hoc pairwise group comparisons were performed.
Limitations
- The paper states that the ASD group included only children with PDDNOS, so conclusions may not extend to full-blown autistic or Asperger disorder; it also recommends larger ADHD samples because symptom heterogeneity and small samples may affect ERP findings.
- The paper notes that artefact-free error trials were difficult to obtain in some children, especially those with ADHD, leading to deviant degrees of freedom in some comparisons; it also states that ERP findings do not allow direct interpretation of deficient brain structures or neurotransmitter systems.
- The paper states that the prefeedback SPN in TD children deviated from adult literature in timing and polarity, so conclusions about its neurobiological origins are reserved; evident from the text, the Mph comparison was not placebo-controlled, and medication-free ADHD children discontinued Mph for at least 17 h rather than being medication-naive.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 73 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data§ a b s t r a c t · p. 2
Compared to the medication-free ADHD group, the Methylphenidate-treated group showed a normalised Pe.
“Compared to the medication-free ADHD group, the Methylphenidate-treated group showed a normalised Pe.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ a b s t r a c t · p. 2
All clinical groups showed or tended to show a decreased feedbacklocked late positive potential to negative feedback.
“All clinical groups showed or tended to show a decreased feedbacklocked late positive potential to negative feedback.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ a b s t r a c t · p. 2
Compared to the TD and ASD groups, the medication-free ADHD group showed a decreased response-locked Error Related Negativity (ERN) and error Positivity (Pe), particularly as learning progressed throughout the task.
“Compared to the TD and ASD groups, the medication-free ADHD group showed a decreased response-locked Error Related Negativity (ERN) and error Positivity (Pe), particularly as learning progressed throughout the task.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 3.1.2. Reaction times · p. 8
The medication-free ADHD group was more variable in their correct RTs than the TD group.
“Overall, however, the medication-free ADHD group was more variable in their correct RTs than the TD group”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 2.1. Subjects · p. 6
The total scores of both the SCQ and CSBQ confirmed that children with ASD showed significantly more autistic-like symptoms than children with ADHD.
“The total scores of both questionnaires confirmed that the children with ASD showed significantly more autistic-like symptoms than the children with ADHD”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The CSBQ is a valid measure of social functioning in children.
- Findingown data§ 2.1. Subjects · p. 6
Children in both ADHD groups showed significantly more attentional problems and hyperactive-impulsive behaviour than children in the ASD group on the DISC-IV.
“children in both ADHD groups showed significantly more attentional problems and hyperactive-impulsive behaviour than the children in the ASD group on the DISC-IV”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The DISC-IV ADHD section is a valid measure for ADHD symptoms.
- Findingown data§ 2.1. Subjects · p. 6
All children included in the ASD group scored at or above the SCQ cut-off of 15.
“All children included in the ASD group scored at or above this cut-off.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given§ 2.1. Subjects · p. 6
31 of the 35 children with ADHD were responding well to methylphenidate (Mph).
“As 31 of the 35 children with ADHD were responding well to Mph”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 3.1.2. Reaction times · p. 8
All groups showed a decrease in RT variability as the task progressed.
“All groups, however, showed a decrease in RT variability as the task progressed”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 3.1.2. Reaction times · p. 8
The difference between incorrect and correct RTs was smaller in the medication-free ADHD group than in the other groups.
“the difference between incorrect and correct RTs was smaller in the medication-free ADHD group than in the other groups”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 3.1.1. Accuracy · p. 8
The overall accuracy on the probabilistic learning task in the informative condition was higher for the TD group in comparison to all clinical groups, despite similar deadlines of their response times.
“the overall accuracy on the probabilistic learning task in the informative condition was higher for the TD group in comparison to all clinical groups, despite similar deadlines of their response times.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 3.2.1. Response-locked potentials · p. 9
There were overall significant response type by section by group interactions for the Pe from 150 to 250 ms.
“This finding is expressed by overall significant response type by section by group interactions ranging from 150 to 250 ms”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 3.2.1. Response-locked potentials · p. 9
The Mph-treated ADHD group did not show a significant learning effect on the ERN.
“while the Mph-treated ADHD group did not show a significant learning effect.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Differences between the first and second sections of the task reflect learning.
- Findingown data§ 3.2.1. Response-locked potentials · p. 9
The medication-free ADHD group showed a decreased Pe amplitude at Pz compared to the TD group.
“Post hoc pairwise group comparisons for the Pe amplitude at Pz, as summarised in Table 3, confirmed the impression from Fig. 3 that the medication-free ADHD group showed a decreased Pe amplitude than the TD group.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 3.2.3. Prefeedback potentials · p. 13
Analyses at F3/F4, C3/C4 and P3/P4 revealed effects of feedback valence with a maximum at centroparietal electrode positions.
“Analyses at F3/F4, C3/C4 and P3/P4 revealed effects of feedback valence with a maximum at centroparietal electrode positions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 3.2.3. Prefeedback potentials · p. 15
In the TD and Mph-treated ADHD groups, the prefeedback potential to positive feedback grew more positive as the task progressed.
“in the TD and Mph-treated ADHD groups, the prefeedback potential to positive feedback grew more positive as the task progressed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 3.2.3. Prefeedback potentials · p. 14
The clinical groups showed smaller differences between positive and negative feedback than the TD group.
“the clinical groups showed smaller differences between positive and negative feedback than the TD group.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 3.2.2. Feedback-induced potentials · p. 13
At Cz, the decrease in feedback P3 amplitude was confined to the interval from 200 to 350 ms.
“At Cz this effect was confined to the feedback P3 interval from 200 to 350 ms”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 3.2.1. Response-locked potentials · p. 9
Both the Mph-treated and medication-free ADHD groups showed smaller ERN amplitudes than the TD group.
“both the Mph-treated and medication-free ADHD groups showed smaller ERN amplitudes than the TD group”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 3.2.1. Response-locked potentials · p. 9
Within the Pe period, a main effect of response type was present at Pz from 100 to 650 ms.
“Within the Pe period a main effect of response type was present at Pz ranging from 100 to 650 ms”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 3.2.3. Prefeedback potentials · p. 15
There was no interaction with hemisphere.
“and no interaction with hemisphere”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 3.2.1. Response-locked potentials · p. 9
The effect of response type on the Pe differed between the first and second sections, as reflected by significant response type by section interactions at Pz from 100 to 550 ms.
“The effect of response type differed between the first and second sections, which is reflected by significant interactions of response type and section at Pz ranging from 100 to 550 ms”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 3.2.1. Response-locked potentials · p. 9
The ERN amplitude appears to be smaller in the clinical groups than in the TD group.
“and it appears to be smaller in the clinical groups.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 3.2.3. Prefeedback potentials · p. 15
There was a significant valence by group interaction from 650 to 0 ms at P3/P4 (F min(3,64)=3.1, p<.05, g2=.13; F max(3,64)=6.5, p<.01, g2=.23).
“There was a significant valence by group interaction from 650 to 0 ms at P3/P4 ( F min(3,64) = 3.1, p < .05, g 2 = .13; F max(3,64) = 6.5, p < .01, g 2 = .23)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 3.2.1. Response-locked potentials · p. 9
The medication-free ADHD group differed significantly from the TD group in the section by response type interaction for the Pe.
“Post hoc pairwise group comparisons for the section by response type interaction, as summarised in Table 3, revealed that the medication-free ADHD group differed significantly from the TD group.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 3.2.2. Feedback-induced potentials · p. 13
Overall, the feedback P3 amplitude decreased from the first to the second sections at Cz and Pz independently of feedback valence.
“Overall, the feedback P3 amplitude decreased from the first to the second sections at Cz and Pz independently of feedback valence”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 3.2.3. Prefeedback potentials · p. 14
The group differences in the valence effect were maximal at P3/P4.
“These group differences were maximal at P3/P4”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 3.2.1. Response-locked potentials · p. 9
The ERN amplitude is larger in the second than in the first section for the TD group.
“As can be seen in Fig. 3, the ERN amplitude is larger in the second than in the first section for the TD group”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 3.2.2. Feedback-induced potentials · p. 11
A positive peak can be observed at Fz and Cz around 185 ms after feedback onset.
“As can be seen in Fig. 5, a positive peak can be observed at Fz and Cz around 185 ms after feedback onset.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 3.2.3. Prefeedback potentials · p. 13
In the interval between stimulus offset and feedback onset, a negative slow wave developed in preparation of negative feedback for all groups.
“In the interval between stimulus offset and feedback onset a negative slow wave developed in preparation of negative feedback for all groups”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 3.2.1. Response-locked potentials · p. 11
The only nearly significant correlation found was a positive correlation between the CBCL internalising scale and the ERN amplitude at Fz (r(52) = .26, p = .06).
“The only nearly significant correlation found was a positive correlation between the CBCL internalising scale in the ERN amplitude at Fz ( r (52) = .26, p = .06).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 3.2.3. Prefeedback potentials · p. 15
The groups differed in learning effects on their prefeedback potentials to positive and negative feedback.
“The groups differed in learning effects on their prefeedback potentials to positive and negative feedback.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 3.2.3. Prefeedback potentials · p. 13
Overall, the prefeedback potentials were more negative over the right hemisphere than over the left, as expressed by an effect of hemisphere from -400 to 0 ms.
“Overall (for the electrode positions F3/F4, C3/C4, P3/P4), the prefeedback potentials were more negative over the right hemisphere than over the left, which is expressed by an effect of hemisphere from 400 to 0 ms”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 3.2.2. Feedback-induced potentials · p. 13
The P2a amplitude decreased from the first section to the second section to an equal extent for positive and negative feedback.
“The P2a amplitude decreased from the first section of the task to the second section to an equal extent for positive and negative feedback.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 3.2.2. Feedback-induced potentials · p. 13
There were no significant group differences for the learning effects on the feedback P3.
“There were no significant group differences for these learning effects.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Differences between the first and second sections of the task reflect learning.
- Findingown data§ 3.2.2. Feedback-induced potentials · p. 13
The medication-free ADHD group differed from the TD, ASD and Mph-treated ADHD groups in their effect of section on the P2a.
“Post hoc pairwise group comparisons, as summarised in Table 4, showed that the medication-free ADHD group differed from the TD, ASD and Mph-treated ADHD group in their effect of section.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 3.2.3. Prefeedback potentials · p. 15
The clinical groups showed similar prefeedback amplitudes to negative feedback as the TD group.
“The clinical groups showed similar prefeedback amplitudes to negative feedback as the TD group (see Table 5)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 3.2.3. Prefeedback potentials · p. 15
There was a significant valence by section by group interaction from 700 to 200 ms at P3/P4 (F min(3,64)=2.5, p<.10, g2=.11; F max(3,64)=5.1, p<.01, g2=.19).
“This is reflected by a significant valence by section by group interaction from 700 to 200 ms at P3/P4 ( F min(3,64) = 2.5, p < .10, g 2 = .11; F max(3,64) = 5.1, p < .01, g 2 = .19).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 3.2.3. Prefeedback potentials · p. 13
Post hoc group comparisons showed that the valence effects at Pz for the late positivity were (nearly) significantly larger for the TD group than for the Mph-treated ADHD group and ASD group.
“Post hoc group comparisons, as summarised in Table 4, showed that the valence effects at Pz in for this late positivity were (nearly) significantly larger for the TD group than for the Mph-treated ADHD group and ASD group.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 3.2.3. Prefeedback potentials · p. 13
No group differences emerged in the early interval of the feedback P3.
“No group differences emerged in the early interval of the feedback P3”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 3.2.3. Prefeedback potentials · p. 15
The prefeedback potential to positive feedback was more positive for the TD group than for all clinical groups.
“whereas the prefeedback potential to positive feedback was more positive for the TD group than for all clinical groups (see Table 5)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 3.2.2. Feedback-induced potentials · p. 13
At Pz, the decrease in feedback P3 amplitude lasted to 750 ms after feedback onset (from 250 to 750 ms).
“but at Pz this effect lasted to 750 ms after feedback onset (from 250 to 750 ms”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 3.2.2. Feedback-induced potentials · p. 13
No group differences could be observed for the effect of feedback valence on the P2a.
“No group differences could be observed for this effect.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 3.2.3. Prefeedback potentials · p. 13
After 450 ms, the groups differed in their effect of valence for a late positivity.
“but after 450 ms the groups differed in their effect of valence for a late positivity”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 3.2.1. Response-locked potentials · p. 9
The medication-free ADHD group differed (nearly) significantly from the ASD and Mph-treated ADHD groups in the section by response type interaction for the Pe, with medium to large effect sizes.
“The medication-free ADHD group, moreover, differed (nearly) significantly from the ASD and Mph-treated ADHD group with medium to large effect sizes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 3.2.3. Prefeedback potentials · p. 13
For all groups, the P2a was followed by a positive component with a centroparietal maximum that was larger for negative than for positive feedback (the feedback P3).
“For all groups, the P2a was followed by a positive component, which showed a centroparietal maximum and which was larger for negative than for positive feedback; the feedback P3.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 3.2.3. Prefeedback potentials · p. 15
The clinical groups did not show such early learning effect to negative feedback.
“The clinical groups did not show such early learning effect to negative feedback, as is reflected by post hoc pairwise comparisons with the TD group (see Table 5).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 3.2.3. Prefeedback potentials · p. 15
The medication-free ADHD group did not show a learning effect for the prefeedback potential to negative feedback.
“The medication-free ADHD group did not show a learning effect for the prefeedback potential to negative feedback, as is expressed by (nearly) significant post hoc pairwise comparisons with the Mph-treated ADHD group and the ASD group.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 3.2.3. Prefeedback potentials · p. 15
The TD and Mph-treated ADHD groups differed (nearly) significantly from the medication-free ADHD group and ASD group for this learning effect.
“The TD and Mph-treated ADHD groups differed (nearly) significantly from the medication-free ADHD group and ASD group for this learning effect, as reflected by post hoc pairwise group comparisons (see Table 5).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 4.1. Response monitoring · p. 15
Decreased ERN and Pe amplitudes were found in medication-free children with ADHD compared to age and intelligence matched TD children and children with ASD.
“This was reflected by decreased ERN and Pe amplitudes in medication-free children with ADHD compared to age and intelligence matched TD children and children with ASD.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 4.1. Response monitoring · p. 15
Children with ADHD show an attenuated ERN.
“The finding of an attenuated ERN adds to the rather inconsistent literature on the size of the ERN amplitude in ADHD.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ 4.1. Response monitoring · p. 16
Children with ADHD show a smaller error-related Pe amplitude with increased learning.
“the finding of a smaller error-related Pe amplitude with increased learning in children with ADHD adds to a more consistent literature”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 3.2.3. Prefeedback potentials · p. 15
From about 250 ms this learning effect for negative feedback did no longer differ significantly from the TD group.
“From about 250 ms this learning effect for negative feedback, however, did no longer differ significantly from the TD group.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 4.1. Response monitoring · p. 16
The learning effect on the Pe was larger for the Mph-treated ADHD group than for the medication-free ADHD group.
“Especially the learning effect on the Pe was larger for the Mph-treated ADHD group than for the medication-free ADHD group”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 4.1. Response monitoring · p. 16
This study found no associations between response monitoring components and autistic-type symptoms within the ASD group.
“this study found no associations between response monitoring components and autistic-type symptoms within the ASD group.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 4.2. Feedback monitoring · p. 16
In none of the experimental groups did the feedback stimuli elicit a typical feedback ERN.
“In none of the experimental groups did the feedback stimuli elicit a typical feedback ERN”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 4.2. Feedback monitoring · p. 16
In this study, the P2a amplitude was larger for negative feedback than for positive feedback.
“In this study the P2a amplitude was larger for negative feedback than for positive feedback”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 4.1. Response monitoring · p. 16
Children with ADHD who took their normal dose of Mph at the time of the experiment showed a normalised Pe amplitude.
“children with ADHD that took their normal dose of Mph at the time of the experiment showed a normalised Pe amplitude”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 4.1. Response monitoring · p. 16
Mph did not modulate the ERN amplitude in children with ADHD.
“Mph did not modulate the ERN amplitude in children with ADHD.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 4.2. Feedback monitoring · p. 16
A frontocentral P2a component was observed in response to feedback stimuli.
“Instead, a frontocentral P2a component was observed, which has only recently been described to occur in response to feedback stimuli (Potts et al., 2006; Van Meel et al., 2005).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Findingown data§ 4.1. Response monitoring · p. 16
Clinical children scoring high on internalising problems show larger ERN amplitudes.
“we did find that clinical children scoring high on internalising problems (i.e. withdrawn behaviour, somatic problems, anxious/ depressive behaviour) show larger ERN amplitudes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 4.1. Response monitoring · p. 16
The Mph-treated ADHD group could not be differentiated from the TD group on the Pe.
“while at the same time the Mph-treated ADHD group could not be differentiated from the TD group.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ 4.3. Feedback anticipation · p. 17
The medication-free ADHD group and the ASD group did not show this learning effect.
“The medication-free ADHD group and the ASD group did not show this learning effect”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given§ 4.4. Conclusions · p. 17
Both the Mph-treated and medication-free ADHD groups as well as the ASD group achieved a lower accuracy level than the TD group on the probabilistic learning task.
“Both the Mph-treated and medication-free ADHD groups as well as the ASD group achieved a lower accuracy level than the TD group on the probabilistic learning task.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 4.3. Feedback anticipation · p. 17
Overall, the prefeedback SPN amplitude to negative feedback did not differ between groups.
“Overall, the prefeedback SPN amplitude to negative feedback did not differ between groups”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 4.3. Feedback anticipation · p. 17
Regarding the prefeedback potential to positive feedback, all clinical groups showed less positive, and even negative, prefeedback SPN amplitudes than the TD children.
“Regarding the prefeedback potential to positive feedback, all clinical groups showed less positive, and even negative, prefeedback SPN amplitudes than the TD children.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 4.3. Feedback anticipation · p. 17
Only the TD and Mph-treated ADHD groups showed a more positive prefeedback potential.
“the fact that only the TD and Mph-treated ADHD groups showed a more positive prefeedback potential”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 4.2. Feedback monitoring · p. 16
Medication-free children with ADHD did not show a decrease in P2a amplitude to negative feedback when learning the task.
“the medication-free children with ADHD did not show a decrease in P2a amplitude to negative feedback when learning the task.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 4.3. Feedback anticipation · p. 17
Medication-free children with ADHD did not show a decrease in prefeedback SPN amplitude with task progression.
“the medication-free children with ADHD in this study did not show a decrease in prefeedback SPN amplitude with task progression”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ 4.3. Feedback anticipation · p. 17
The Mph-treated children with ADHD also showed 'normalised' learning effects on the P2a and prefeedback SPN.
“together with the 'normalised' Pe amplitude, they also showed 'normalised' learning effects on the P2a and prefeedback SPN.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 4.2. Feedback monitoring · p. 17
All groups showed an enlarged feedback P3 to negative feedback compared to positive feedback.
“All groups showed an enlarged feedback P3 to negative feedback compared to positive feedback”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 4.2. Feedback monitoring · p. 17
The 'traditional' P3 amplitude to the feedback stimuli did not discriminate the children with ADHD and children with ASD from the TD children.
“the 'traditional' P3 amplitude to the feedback stimuli (which in this study ranges from 200 to 450 ms after feedback onset) did not discriminate the children with ADHD and children with ASD from the TD children.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ 4.3. Feedback anticipation · p. 17
TD children have a higher level of accuracy on the task in comparison to the clinical groups.
“This is in correspondence with their higher level of accuracy on the task in comparison to the clinical groups.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 4.2. Feedback monitoring · p. 16
TD children showed an increased late positivity (from 450 ms after feedback onset) to negative opposed to positive feedback.
“The TD children showed an increased late positivity (from 450 ms after feedback onset) to negative opposed to positive feedback”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 4.2. Feedback monitoring · p. 16
The late positivity to negative feedback was attenuated in the ASD and Mph-treated ADHD groups.
“which was attenuated in the ASD and Mph-treated ADHD groups.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 4.2. Feedback monitoring · p. 16
The comparison of the medication-free ADHD group and TD group did not reveal significant differences for the late positivity.
“The comparison of the medication-free ADHD group and TD group did not reveal significant differences for this positivity”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data§ 2.1. Subjects · p. 4
The TD children scored significantly lower on the Children's Social Behaviour Questionnaire (CSBQ) than the clinical groups.
“The TD children, moreover, scored significantly lower on a parental questionnaire measuring social dysfunction: the Children's Social Behaviour Questionnaire (CSBQ: Hartman et al., 2006).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ 1.1. Objective · p. 2
Both ADHD and ASD have been related to executive functioning (EF) deficits.
“both ADHD and ASD have been related to executive functioning (EF) deficits (Geurts et al., 2004; Happé et al., 2006; Ozonoff and Jensen, 1999)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Interpretationown data§ a b s t r a c t · p. 2
Both children with ADHD and children with ASD are suggested being compromised in affective feedback processing.
“Both children with ADHD and children with ASD are suggested being compromised in affective feedback processing.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductnone given§ 2.1. Subjects · p. 4
All children with ADHD scored either in the clinical range of the DISC-IV or in the borderline range of the CTRS-R.
“All children with ADHD scored either in the clinical range of the DISC-IV or in the borderline range of the CTRS-R.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ 1.2. Response monitoring in ADHD and ASD · p. 3
The Pe is fairly consistently found to be decreased in children with ADHD.
“The Pe is fairly consistently found to be decreased in children with ADHD, suggesting that they become less aware of their committed errors (Jonkman et al., 2007; Overtoom et al., 2002; Wiersema et al., 2005; but see: Burgio-Murphy et al., 2007).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation§ 1.1. Objective · p. 2
In clinical practice it often appears difficult to discriminate between ADHD and ASD.
“in clinical practice it often appears difficult to discriminate between the two disorders (Clark et al., 1999; Jensen et al., 1997).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation§ 1.2. Response monitoring in ADHD and ASD · p. 3
Mph improves error processing in children with ADHD.
“a recent placebo-controlled study revealed that Mph improves error processing in children with ADHD (Jonkman et al., 2007).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Jonkman et al., 2007 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data§ a b s t r a c t · p. 2
This capacity partially 'normalises' in Mph-treated children with ADHD.
“This capacity partially 'normalises' in Mph-treated children with ADHD.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ 1.2. Response monitoring in ADHD and ASD · p. 3
Findings on the ERN amplitude in ADHD are inconsistent.
“Findings on the ERN amplitude in ADHD are inconsistent.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data§ a b s t r a c t · p. 2
The ERPs suggest that medication-free children with ADHD, but not with ASD, have a diminished capacity to monitor their error responses when they are learning by performance feedback.
“The ERPs suggest that medication-free children with ADHD, but not with ASD, have a diminished capacity to monitor their error responses when they are learning by performance feedback.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 2.1. Subjects · p. 6
Medication intake during the period questioned in the interview very likely caused lower scores than would have been obtained at the time of diagnosis in children with ADHD.
“medication intake during the period that was questioned in the interview very likely caused lower scores than would have been obtained at the time of the diagnosis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ 1.2. Response monitoring in ADHD and ASD · p. 3
Mph-treated children with ADHD showed a normalised error-related Pe amplitude.
“In this study children with ADHD treated with Mph showed a normalised error-related Pe amplitude.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Jonkman et al., 2007 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 2.1. Subjects · p. 6
The lower scores due to medication intake may explain why five children scored below threshold on both subscales of the DISC-IV ADHD section.
“This may explain why five children scored below threshold on both subscales of the DISC-IV ADHD section.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ 1.3. Feedback monitoring in ADHD and ASD · p. 3
Children with ADHD showed a reduced P2a amplitude to both positive and negative feedback stimuli.
“Compared to TD children, children with ADHD showed a reduced P2a amplitude to both positive and negative feedback stimuli, suggesting that the early discrimination or categorisation of motivationally relevant stimuli is compromised in these children (Van Meel et al., 2005).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Van Meel et al., 2005 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 1.3. Feedback monitoring in ADHD and ASD · p. 4
Children with ADHD showed decreased prefeedback SPN amplitudes compared to TD children.
“Compared to TD children, children with ADHD showed decreased prefeedback SPN amplitudes (Van Meel et al., In preparation).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Van Meel et al., In preparation
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 2.1. Subjects · p. 6
The SCQ is a valid measure for discriminating ASD from non-ASD cases with a cut-off of 15.
“To date, two validation studies have revealed that the SCQ is a valid measure for discriminating ASD from non-ASD cases with a cut-off of P 15”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation§ 1.2. Response monitoring in ADHD and ASD · p. 3
Henderson et al. (2006) could not reveal overall differences in ERN amplitude between the ASD and TD groups.
“They could, however, not reveal overall differences in ERN amplitude between the ASD and TD groups”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Henderson et al., 2006 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 1.2. Response monitoring in ADHD and ASD · p. 3
Several neuroimaging studies have found support for a hypofunctional ACC in autism.
“Concerning ASD, several neuroimaging studies have found support for a hypofunctional ACC in autism (Gomot et al., 2006; Haznedar et al., 2000; Ohnishi et al., 2000)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation§ 1.3. Feedback monitoring in ADHD and ASD · p. 3
Children with ADHD showed a decreased late positivity (after 450 ms) to negative feedback stimuli indicating loss.
“Additionally, children with ADHD showed a decreased late positivity (after 450 ms) to negative feedback stimuli indicating loss.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Van Meel et al., 2005 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 1.2. Response monitoring in ADHD and ASD · p. 3
Performance studies have suggested deficits in error correction in autism.
“Performance studies have suggested deficits in error correction in autism.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ 1.2. Response monitoring in ADHD and ASD · p. 3
Mph does not modulate the ERN in children with ADHD.
“Jonkman and colleagues, however, did not find a modulating effect of Mph on the ERN in children with ADHD.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Jonkman et al., 2007 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data§ 3.2.1. Response-locked potentials · p. 11
With increasing internalising problems, the ERN amplitude also increased.
“This means that with increasing internalising problems, the ERN amplitude also increased.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ 4.1. Response monitoring · p. 15
Frontostriatal dopamine pathways are hypofunctional in ADHD.
“the bulk of neuroimaging studies suggesting that frontostriatal dopamine pathways are hypofunctional in ADHD (Bush et al., 2005; Castellanos and Tannock, 2002; Dickstein et al., 2006; Durston, 2003).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Interpretationcitation§ 4.1. Response monitoring · p. 15
The early peak latency may be explained by a time delay between electromyografic activity onset in the finger, to which the ERN may be closely time locked, and the actual registered mechanical response.
“The early peak latency may be explained by a time delay between electromyografic activity onset in the finger, to which the ERN may be closely time locked (Gehring et al., 1990), and the actual registered mechanical response.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gehring et al., 1990
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 4.1. Response monitoring · p. 16
The Pe amplitude has been found to be related to post-error slowing in healthy adults.
“As the Pe amplitude has been found to be related to post-error slowing in healthy adults (Hajcak et al., 2003; Nieuwenhuis et al., 2001)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Interpretationcitation§ 4.1. Response monitoring · p. 15
Heterogeneity of investigated ADHD groups may explain inconsistent findings on ERN amplitude in ADHD.
“One explanation for these inconsistent findings may be the heterogeneity of the investigated ADHD groups in general, with some patients having more attentional problems, others having more hyperactive-impulsive problems and still others showing comorbid problems like disruptive behaviour or internalising problems.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sagvolden et al., 2005 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data§ 4.1. Response monitoring · p. 15
The ERP data in this study revealed a response monitoring deficit in children with ADHD only.
“the ERP data in this study revealed a response monitoring deficit in children with ADHD only.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation§ 4.2. Feedback monitoring · p. 16
The P2a may be interpreted as a general attentional reaction to motivationally salient stimuli.
“may be interpreted as a general attentional reaction to motivationally salient stimuli, as this component has repeatedly been found to increase when the task relevance of stimuli increases (Falkenstein et al., 2003; Potts, 2004).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Interpretationreasoning§ 4.1. Response monitoring · p. 16
Decreased activity of the LC-NE system, as reflected by an attenuated Pe amplitude, suggests that children with ADHD do not benefit as much from their errors as TD children do.
“Decreased activity of this system, as reflected by an attenuated Pe amplitude, suggests that children with ADHD do not benefit as much from their errors as TD children do.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ 4.1. Response monitoring · p. 16
In healthy brains, quick arousal responses from the LC-NE system increase the state of alertness and sensory information processing.
“In healthy brains, such quick arousal responses from the LC-NE system increase the state of alertness and sensory information processing (Berridge and Waterhouse, 2003).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Berridge and Waterhouse, 2003 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 4.1. Response monitoring · p. 16
The conclusions about ASD may not extend to patients suffering from the full-blown syndrome of autism or Asperger, because this study only included children with a sub-threshold form of autism.
“these conclusions may not extend to patients suffering from the full-blown syndrome of autism or Asperger, because this study only included children with a sub-threshold form of autism.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ 4.1. Response monitoring · p. 16
The Pe has been suggested to reflect phasic noradrenaline responses from the LC-NE system in response to errors.
“the Pe has been suggested to reflect phasic noradrenaline responses from the LC-NE system in response to errors (Davies et al., 2001; Leuthold and Sommer, 1999; O'Connell et al., 2007; Overbeek et al., 2005).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Davies et al., 2001 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Leuthold and Sommer, 1999
Not checked in the free run.
- cites O'Connell et al., 2007
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 4.1. Response monitoring · p. 16
Adult studies show that stimulants like Mph boost the response-locked ERN amplitude.
“This is contradictory to evidence from adult studies showing that stimulants like Mph boost the response-locked ERN amplitude (De Bruijn et al., 2004; De Bruijn et al., 2005).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Interpretationreasoning§ 4.1. Response monitoring · p. 16
The attenuated Pe amplitude in children with ADHD is in line with findings of reduced post-error slowing in children with ADHD.
“the attenuated Pe amplitude is in line with findings of reduced post error slowing in children with ADHD (Schachar et al., 2004; Sergeant and Van der Meere, 1988; Wiersema et al., 2005).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Interpretationcitation§ 4.1. Response monitoring · p. 16
An attenuated Pe in ADHD agrees with the catecholamine hypothesis that next to the dopaminergic system, the NE system is involved in the pathology of ADHD.
“An attenuated Pe in ADHD, moreover, agrees with the catecholamine hypothesis that next to the dopaminergic system, the NE system is involved in the pathology of ADHD (Pliszka, 2005).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Pliszka, 2005 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 4.1. Response monitoring · p. 16
The normalised Pe in Mph-treated children with ADHD may be explained by the stimulating effect of Mph on the noradrenaline system.
“Because of its hypothesised noradrenergic origin, the normalised Pe in Mph-treated children with ADHD may be explained by the stimulating effect of Mph on the noradrenaline system.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ 4.1. Response monitoring · p. 16
The NE system is involved in the pathology of ADHD.
“the catecholamine hypothesis that next to the dopaminergic system, the NE system is involved in the pathology of ADHD (Pliszka, 2005).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Pliszka, 2005 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 4.3. Feedback anticipation · p. 17
For the medication-free ADHD group and the ASD group, positive feedback kept its relevance during the whole task.
“suggesting that for these groups positive feedback kept its relevance during the whole task.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ 4.3. Feedback anticipation · p. 17
The findings on the prefeedback SPN suggest that both children with ADHD and children with ASD do anticipate upcoming positive and negative feedback.
“the findings on the prefeedback SPN suggest that both children with ADHD and children with ASD do anticipate upcoming positive and negative feedback.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ 4.4. Conclusions · p. 17
The ERPs revealed that the three groups could be differentiated on a set of component processes of error and feedback processing.
“The ERPs, however, revealed that the three groups could be differentiated on a set of component processes of error and feedback processing.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 4.3. Feedback anticipation · p. 17
For the TD and Mph-treated ADHD groups, the upcoming positive feedback became less relevant as the task had been learned.
“suggests that for these groups the upcoming positive feedback became less relevant as the task had been learned.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given§ 4.3. Feedback anticipation · p. 17
In case of positive feedback, the medication-free ADHD group and ASD group may even attach more value to the upcoming feedback than the TD children, particularly as learning progresses throughout the task.
“In case of positive feedback, the medication-free ADHD group and ASD group may even attach more value to the upcoming feedback than the TD children, particularly as learning progresses throughout the task.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ 4.3. Feedback anticipation · p. 17
A more negative amplitude of the prefeedback SPN has been related to increased anticipation of upcoming feedback stimuli.
“As a more negative amplitude of this potential has been related to increased anticipation of upcoming feedback stimuli (Bastiaansen et al., 2002; Böcker et al., 2001)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Interpretationown data§ 4.2. Feedback monitoring · p. 17
The finding of an intact feedback-related P3 in medication-free children with ADHD as well as a decreased response-related Pe appears contradictory to recent studies proposing that both components have a similar neurobiological source.
“Our finding of an intact feedback-related P3 in medication-free children with ADHD as well as a decreased responserelated Pe appears contradictory to recent studies, proposing that both components have a similar neurobiological source”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 4.3. Feedback anticipation · p. 17
The ability of the Mph-treated children with ADHD to predict negative feedback and adjust anticipation may be related to the 'normalising' effect of Mph on the Pe amplitude.
“The ability of the Mph-treated children with ADHD to predict negative feedback and adjust anticipation may be related to the 'normalising' effect of Mph on the Pe amplitude.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation§ 4.3. Feedback anticipation · p. 17
A negative prefeedback SPN in the clinical groups, opposed to the positive potential in the TD group, suggests that upcoming positive feedback is more relevant to the clinical than to the TD children.
“a negative prefeedback SPN in the clinical groups, opposed to the positive potential in the TD group, suggests that upcoming positive feedback is more relevant to the clinical than to the TD children.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ 4.2. Feedback monitoring · p. 16
This study suggests deficits in late external feedback processing in both children with ADHD and children with ASD.
“this study suggest deficits in late external feedback processing in both children with ADHD and children with ASD.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ 4.4. Conclusions · p. 17
In contrast to the TD children and children with ASD, the medication-free children with ADHD are suggested having a deficit in shifting from feedback monitoring to response monitoring while learning by performance feedback.
“In contrast to the TD children and children with ASD, the medication-free children with ADHD are suggested having a deficit in shifting from feedback monitoring to response monitoring while learning by performance feedback.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ 4.4. Conclusions · p. 17
Increased effects of learning on the ERPs in the Mph-treated ADHD group compared to the medication-free ADHD group provide some evidence for a modulating effect of Mph on response monitoring (Pe), feedback anticipation (prefeedback SPN) and feedback processing (P2a) in children with ADHD.
“Increased effects of learning on the ERPs in the Mph-treated ADHD group compared to the medication-free ADHD group provide some evidence for a modulating effect of Mph on response monitoring (Pe), feedback anticipation (prefeedback SPN) and feedback processing (P2a) in children with ADHD.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ 4.3. Feedback anticipation · p. 17
The clinical groups have no fundamental problems in anticipating negative feedback.
“suggesting that the clinical groups have no fundamental problems in anticipating negative feedback.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ 4.4. Conclusions · p. 17
The aberrant late feedback processing in ASD and Mph-treated ADHD suggests diminished affective processing of external error information, i.e. 'motivated attention' in both disorders.
“suggesting diminished affective processing of external error information, i.e. 'motivated attention' in both disorders.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- May combine two claims. 57
- The quote only partly states this claim. 10
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 20
May combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 3.1.2. Reaction times · p. 8In the informative condition the children were faster on incorrect trials than on correct trials (463 ms vs. 496 ms), except for the medication-free ADHD group (481 ms vs. 487 ms).
“In the informative condition the children were faster on incorrect trials than on correct trials (463 ms vs. 496 ms), except for the medication-free ADHD group (481 ms vs. 487 ms).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 3.1.1. Accuracy · p. 8All groups increased in accuracy as the learning task progressed, but the learning rate (steepness of learning curves) did not differ between groups.
“All groups increased in accuracy as the learning task progressed, but the learning rate, i.e. the steepness of the learning curves, did not differ between groups.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 3.1.2. Reaction times · p. 8Within the informative condition the groups did not differ in their mean RT for correct trials, and none of the groups showed a learning effect for these RTs as the learning task progressed.
“Within the informative condition the groups did not differ in their mean RT for correct trials, and none of the groups showed a learning effect for these RTs as the learning task progressed”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 3.1.1. Accuracy · p. 8The groups neither differed in the duration of their individual deadlines (mean 785 ms, SD 93 ms) nor in their percentage of late responses (mean 6%, SD 5.5%).
“the groups neither differed in the duration of their individual deadlines (mean 785 ms, SD 93 ms) nor in their percentage of late responses (mean 6%, SD 5.5%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 3.2.1. Response-locked potentials · p. 9Within the ERN period an overall effect of response type was present at Fz from −120 to −80 ms and at Cz from −180 to −80 ms.
“Within the ERN period an overall effect of response type was present at Fz from 120 to 80 ms ( F min(1,66) = 10.3, p < .01, g 2 = .14; F max(1,66) = 70.7, p < .001, g 2 = .52) and at Cz from 180 to 80 ms ( F min(1,66) = 6.9, p < .05, g 2 = .10; F max(1,66) = 113.7, p < .001, g 2 = .63).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ 2.1. Subjects · p. 6The five children who scored below threshold on both subscales of the DISC-IV ADHD section were all Mph-responders but still scored minimally four out of nine symptoms of at least one of the DISC-IV subscales.
“These children were all Mph-responders, but still scored minimally four out of nine symptoms of at least one of the DISC-IV subscales.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The DISC-IV ADHD section is a valid measure for ADHD symptoms.
May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown data§ 3.2.1. Response-locked potentials · p. 9The amplitude of the ERN differed between groups at Fz only, as expressed by interactions of response type by group from −40 to 80 ms at Fz and absence of such interactions at Cz.
“The amplitude of the ERN differed between groups at Fz only. This is expressed by interactions of response type by group from 40 to 80 ms at Fz with medium to large effect size ( F min(3,66) = 2.5, p < .10, g 2 = .10; F max(3,66) = 3.8, p < .05, g 2 = .15) and absence of such interactions at Cz.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown data§ 3.2.2. Feedback-induced potentials · p. 13The P2a was larger for negative feedback than for positive feedback, as reflected by effects of feedback valence from 160 to 240 ms at Fz and Cz.
“The P2a was larger for negative feedback than for positive feedback, which is reflected by effects of feedback valence from 160 to 240 ms at Fz with small to large effect sizes”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 3.2.1. Response-locked potentials · p. 9Both the Mph-treated ADHD group and the ASD group differ from the TD group in their learning effect on the ERN.
“Post hoc pairwise group comparisons are summarised in Table 3, showing that both the Mph-treated ADHD group and the ASD group differ from the TD group in their learning effect on the ERN.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Differences between the first and second sections of the task reflect learning.
May combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 3.2.2. Feedback-induced potentials · p. 13All the latter groups (TD, ASD, Mph-treated ADHD) showed a decrease in P2a amplitude from the first to the second sections, while the medication-free ADHD group did not.
“As can be seen in Fig. 5, all the latter groups showed a decrease in P2a amplitude from the first to the second sections, while the medication-free group did not.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown data§ 3.2.3. Prefeedback potentials · p. 13The effect of hemisphere was strongest over centrofrontal electrode positions, as expressed by an overall interaction of electrode by hemisphere from -750 to 0 ms and significant long-lasting effects of hemisphere at F3/F4 and C3/C4.
“The effect of hemisphere was strongest over centrofrontal electrode positions, which is expressed by an overall interaction of electrode by hemisphere from 750 to 0 ms”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown data§ 3.2.2. Feedback-induced potentials · p. 13The decrease in P2a amplitude was reflected by effects of section at Fz from 160 to 200 ms and at Cz from 160 to 240 ms.
“This is reflected by effects of section at Fz from 160 to 200 ms with small to medium effect sizes”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 3.2.1. Response-locked potentials · p. 9The Mph-treated ADHD group and ASD group did not differ significantly from the medication-free ADHD group in Pe amplitude at Pz (p > .05), but these group differences approached significance with medium effect sizes.
“The Mph-treated ADHD group and ASD group did not differ significantly from the medication-free ADHD group ( p -values > .05), but these group differences approached significance showing medium effect sizes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 3.2.1. Response-locked potentials · p. 9The Pe is larger in the second section than in the first section, but this learning effect is substantially smaller and of later appearance for the medication-free ADHD group than for the other groups.
“As can be seen in Fig. 3, the Pe is larger in the second section than in the first section, but this learning effect is found substantially smaller and of later appearance for the medication-free ADHD group than for the other groups.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Differences between the first and second sections of the task reflect learning.
May combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 3.2.1. Response-locked potentials · p. 9The overall interaction of response type and group for the Pe showed only a trend to significance, with medium effect sizes in the interval 150 to 400 ms.
“Although the overall interactions of response type and group showed only a trend to significance, effect sizes in the interval of 150 to 400 ms were medium”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 3.2.2. Feedback-induced potentials · p. 13Only at Fz did the groups differ in the effect of section on the P2a from 160 to 200 ms, as reflected by overall interactions of section by groups at Fz.
“Only at Fz did the groups differ in this effect from 160 to 200 ms, which is reflected by overall interactions of section by groups at Fz with medium effect sizes”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown data§ 3.2.3. Prefeedback potentials · p. 13Significant interactions of electrode position by valence were present for the entire prefeedback period, with effects largest for parietal electrodes and smaller for frontal electrode positions.
“This is reflected by significant interactions of electrode position by valence for the entire prefeedback period”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown data§ 3.2.3. Prefeedback potentials · p. 13Significant valence by group interactions at Pz for the late positivity were only short-lasting from 600 to 700 ms and from 850 to 1000 ms, but effect sizes ranged from medium to large for all intervals between 450 and 1000 ms.
“effect sizes of this interaction ranged from medium to large for all intervals between 450 and 1000 ms.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 3.2.3. Prefeedback potentials · p. 13There were no significant interactions of hemisphere by group nor of hemisphere by valence, so the hemisphere factor was not taken into account in further analyses.
“Yet, there were no significant interactions of hemisphere by group nor of hemisphere by valence and, therefore, this factor will not be taken into account in the further analyses.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 3.2.1. Response-locked potentials · p. 9Both the ASD and medication-free ADHD groups show an increase in ERN amplitude with learning, but these effects lasted shorter than in the TD group.
“Analyses on the individual group level revealed that both the ASD and medication-free ADHD groups show an increase in ERN amplitude with learning, but that these effects lasted shorter than in the TD group”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Differences between the first and second sections of the task reflect learning.
May combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 3.2.3. Prefeedback potentials · p. 13Significant effects of feedback valence on the feedback P3 were present from 200 to 400 ms at Cz and from 200 to 500 ms at Pz.
“This is reflected by significant effects of feedback valence from 200 to 400 ms at Cz and from 200 to 500 ms at Pz”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown data§ 3.2.1. Response-locked potentials · p. 9The ERN amplitude at Fz differed between the first and second sections of the task, as reflected by response type by section interactions from -40 to 100 ms.
“The ERN amplitude at Fz differed between the first and second sections, which is reflected by an interactions between response type and section from 40 to 100 ms”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown data§ 3.2.2. Feedback-induced potentials · p. 13At Cz no group differences were present for the effect of section on the P2a.
“At Cz no group differences were present.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 3.2.3. Prefeedback potentials · p. 13The prefeedback potential to positive feedback was less negative than the potential to negative feedback for the clinical groups, and over centroparietal electrode positions it was even positive for the TD group.
“The prefeedback potential to positive feedback, however, was less negative than the potential to negative feedback for the clinical groups and, over centroparietal electrode positions, it was even positive for the TD group.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 3.2.1. Response-locked potentials · p. 9The ASD group did not differ from the TD group in ERN amplitude, but could be differentiated from the medication-free ADHD group with medium to large effect size.
“The ASD group did not differ from the TD group in ERN amplitude, but could be differentiated from the medication-free ADHD group with medium to large effect size.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown data§ 3.2.1. Response-locked potentials · p. 9The learning effect on the ERN differed between groups, as reflected by response type by section by group interactions from -40 to 100 ms.
“However, this learning effect differed between groups, which is reflected by interactions of response type by section by group from 40 to 100 ms with medium to large effect sizes”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Differences between the first and second sections of the task reflect learning.
May combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 3.2.3. Prefeedback potentials · p. 15Both the Mph-treated ADHD group and the ASD group showed a later learning effect; their prefeedback potential to negative feedback grew less negative with task progression from about 500 ms before feedback onset.
“Both the Mph-treated ADHD group and the ASD group showed a later learning effect; their prefeedback potential to negative feedback grew less negative with task progression from about 500 ms before feedback onset.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone given§ 4.1. Response monitoring · p. 15Both children with ADHD and children with ASD performed worse on the probabilistic learning task than TD children.
“Although both children with ADHD and children with ASD performed worse on the probabilistic learning task than TD children”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 3.2.3. Prefeedback potentials · p. 15The prefeedback potential to negative feedback of the TD group grew more negative as the task progressed, but this effect disappeared around 500 ms before feedback onset.
“the prefeedback potential to negative feedback of the TD group grew more negative as the task progressed, but this effect disappeared around 500 ms before feedback onset.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingcitation§ 4.1. Response monitoring · p. 15The effects of response type emerged as early as 180 ms before the response, which has also been observed in previous developmental studies.
“the effects of response type emerged as early as 180 ms before the response, which has also been observed in previous developmental studies (although not explicitly mentioned in the text: Davies et al., 2004; Santesso et al., 2006).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 4.1. Response monitoring · p. 15The ERN in this study showed a peak latency around response onset, which is much earlier than the usually observed peak latency between 40 and 100 ms in adults.
“the ERN in this study showed a peak latency around response onset, which is much earlier than the usually observed peak latency between 40 and 100 ms in adults (Falkenstein et al., 1991; Gehring et al., 1990).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Falkenstein et al., 1991 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Gehring et al., 1990
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 4.1. Response monitoring · p. 16Children with ASD showed no response monitoring deficits, as neither differences in overall ERN nor in Pe amplitude were found in comparison to TD children.
“the children with ASD showed no response monitoring deficits, as neither differences in overall ERN nor in Pe amplitude were found in comparison to TD children.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 4.4. Conclusions · p. 17The ASD group showed no deficits in response monitoring (ERN and Pe) and no deviating learning effects on negative feedback anticipation (prefeedback SPN) and early feedback processing (P2a).
“The ASD group showed no deficits in response monitoring (ERN and Pe) and no deviating learning effects on negative feedback anticipation (prefeedback SPN) and early feedback processing (P2a).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 4.2. Feedback monitoring · p. 16In the investigated ERP period, some group interactions approached significance and showed medium effect sizes.
“but in the investigated ERP period some group interactions approached significance and showed medium effect sizes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown data§ 4.2. Feedback monitoring · p. 16This study could not replicate the finding of smaller P2a to negative feedback in children with ADHD and hence could not confirm such early disturbance of feedback processing in children with ADHD.
“This study could not replicate this finding and hence confirm such early disturbance of feedback processing in children with ADHD.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 4.4. Conclusions · p. 17Although the ERP figures and analyses also suggested such deficit in medication-free ADHD children, these effects did not reach statistical significance.
“Although the ERP figures and analyses also suggested such deficit in medication-free ADHD children, these effects did not reach statistical significance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ 4.4. Conclusions · p. 17The ASD group as well as the Mph-treated ADHD group showed aberrant late feedback processing (LPP).
“the ASD group as well as the Mph-treated ADHD group showed aberrant late feedback processing (LPP)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown data§ 2.1. Subjects · p. 4The ratio of boys and girls was approximately 5:1, which did not differ significantly between groups.
“The ratio of boys and girls was approximately 5:1, which did not differ significantly between groups.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoning§ 2.1. Subjects · p. 4The medication-free condition discontinued Mph-intake for at least 17 h before the experiment.
“Those assigned to the medication-free condition were asked to discontinue Mph-intake for at least 17 h before they entered the experiment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 1.1. Objective · p. 2Many children with ADHD also have ASD symptoms and vice versa.
“Phenomenological studies report that many children with ADHD also have ASD symptoms and vice versa (see for a review: Nijmeijer et al., 2008)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Nijmeijer et al., 2008 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown data§ 2.1. Subjects · p. 4The four groups neither differed in age nor in intelligence.
“The four groups neither differed in age nor in intelligence (see Table 1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoning§ 2.1. Subjects · p. 4The 17-h Mph washout period was considered long enough due to an expected clearance within 4-5 times the half-life of Mph, which is about 3.5 h.
“This period was considered long enough due to an expected clearance within 4-5 times the half-life of Mph, which is about 3.5 h.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown data§ a b s t r a c t · p. 2Measuring ERPs of error and feedback processing is a useful method for dissociating ADHD from ASD and elucidating medication effects in ADHD on component processes of performance monitoring.
“This study shows that measuring ERPs of error and feedback processing is a useful method for (1) dissociating ADHD from ASD and (2) elucidating medication effects in ADHD on component processes of performance monitoring.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown data§ 2.1. Subjects · p. 4None of the TD children scored within the clinical range of the total problem scale of the CBCL, suggesting that they were free from clinical behaviour problems.
“None of the TD children scored within the clinical range of the total problem scale of this list, suggesting that they were free from clinical behaviour problems.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone given§ 2.1. Subjects · p. 4The Mph responders were randomly assigned to an Mph-treated or medication-free condition.
“These Mph responders were randomly assigned to an Mph-treated or medication-free condition.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown data§ 2.1. Subjects · p. 4The ratio of left: ambidexter: right did not differ significantly between groups.
“The ratio of left: ambidexter: right did not differ significantly between groups.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 3. Results · p. 8A previous report on the present sample of TD children indicated that in the uninformative condition less performance monitoring activity is present than in the informative condition, suggesting that the task manipulations were effective.
“A previous report on the present sample of TD children indicated that in the uninformative condition less performance monitoring activity is present than in the informative condition, suggesting that the task manipulations were effective (Groen et al., 2007).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Groen et al., 2007 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoning§ 2.5. Data analyses · p. 7The chance of finding three consecutive effects with each showing a significance level of at least p = .10 in a series of 20 intervals is 0.018, which is below the significance criterion of p = .05.
“The chance of finding three consecutive effects with each showing a significance level of at least p = .10 in a series of 20 intervals (e.g. in case of the ERN) is reduced to 18 * 0.10 * 0.10 * 0.10 = 0.018, which is below the significance criterion of p = .05.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoning§ 2.5. Data analyses · p. 7Because analyses were performed for multiple successive intervals, there was an increasing risk of capitalisation on chance; therefore, effects were only considered meaningful if three or more consecutive intervals were significant (p < .05) or showed a trend to significance (p < .10) in combination with a minimally medium effect size (η2p ≥ .06).
“Because analyses were performed for multiple successive intervals there was an increasing risk of capitalisation on chance. Therefore, effects were only considered meaningful if three or more consecutive intervals were significant ( p < .05) or showed a trend to significance ( p < .10) in combination with a minimally medium effect size ( g 2 P .06).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoning§ 2.5. Data analyses · p. 8For the P2a, two consecutive effects with p < .10 were considered to suffice because the chance of finding two consecutive effects, each with p = .10, is 0.05.
“In case of the P2a, which is a rather short-lasting component investigated in only six intervals, two consecutive effects with p < .10 were considered to suffice, for the chance of finding two consecutive effects, each with p = .10, is 5* 0.10 * 0.10 = 0.05.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitation§ 2.4. Electroencephalogram recordings and computation of ERPs · p. 7Segments with eye movements and blinks were kept and corrected using the standard Gratton and Coles procedure.
“Segments with eye movements and blinks were kept and corrected, adopting the standard Gratton and Coles procedure (Gratton et al., 1983).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gratton et al., 1983 source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 1.3. Feedback monitoring in ADHD and ASD · p. 4Autistic children are less sensitive to social feedback, while they show no deficient sensitivity to non-social feedback.
“These studies all show that, compared to TD children, autistic children are less sensitive to social feedback, e.g. smiling or words of appreciation, while they show no deficient sensitivity to non-social feedback, e.g. money or sensory feedback (Dawson et al., 2002; Garretson et al., 1990; Ingersoll et al., 2003).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 2.5. Data analyses · p. 7The ERN and feedback ERN have a midline frontocentral topography, and the Pe has a more widespread centroparietal topography.
“the ERN and feedback ERN have been described to have a midline frontocentral topography (Falkenstein et al., 1991; Gehring et al., 1993) and the Pe a more widespread centroparietal topography (Davies et al., 2001; Falkenstein et al., 1991).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoning§ 3.1.2. Reaction times · p. 8In some children not enough artefact-free error trials could be obtained in the second task half, due to low error rates in combination with high artefact frequencies, which explains the deviant degrees of freedom in some comparisons.
“In some children not enough artefact-free error trials could be obtained in the second task half, due to low error rates in combination with high artefact frequencies. This explains the deviant degrees of freedom in some comparisons.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 3.1.2. Reaction times · p. 8When measuring EEG, it is more difficult in children than in adults to obtain ERPs that are free from artefacts resulting from head movements and eye movements, and this holds to an even greater extent for children suffering from ADHD.
“When measuring EEG, it is more difficult in children than in adults to obtain ERPs that are free from artefacts resulting from head movements and eye movements (De Boer et al., 2005). This holds to an even greater extent for children suffering from ADHD.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites De Boer et al., 2005
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown data§ 3.2.1. Response-locked potentials · p. 11Inspection of the scatterplot indicated that neither outliers nor eventual subgroups of the internalising scale could explain the correlation between CBCL internalising and ERN amplitude at Fz.
“Inspection of the scatterplot indicated that neither outliers nor eventual subgroups of the internalising scale could explain this correlation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 4.1. Response monitoring · p. 16Reduced error awareness may hamper children with ADHD in learning from their mistakes and, on the longer term, to develop adaptive behaviour.
“Reduced error awareness may hamper children with ADHD in learning from their mistakes and, on the longer term, to develop adaptive behaviour.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone given§ 4.1. Response monitoring · p. 15The TD children were age and intelligence matched to the clinical groups.
“compared to age and intelligence matched TD children and children with ASD”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 4.1. Response monitoring · p. 15This time delay may be as long as 80 to 131 ms.
“This time delay may be as long as 80 to 131 ms (Burle et al., 2002).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Burle et al., 2002 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone given§ 4.1. Response monitoring · p. 15The children with ADHD were medication-free.
“medication-free children with ADHD”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ 4.1. Response monitoring · p. 15Recent psychophysiological and performance studies have suggested performance monitoring deficiencies in the developmental disorders ADHD and ASD.
“Recent psychophysiological and performance studies have suggested performance monitoring deficiencies in the developmental disorders ADHD and ASD.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown data§ 4.1. Response monitoring · p. 15Children with ADHD have a deficit in both early error detection and later error awareness.
“the amplitudes of both the ERN and Pe suggest that children with ADHD have a deficit in both early error detection and later error awareness.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ 4.1. Response monitoring · p. 15Such early errorrelated differences may be specific for children.
“Such early errorrelated differences may, therefore, be specific for children”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ 4.1. Response monitoring · p. 15A decreased response-related ERN in children with ADHD is in line with neuroimaging studies suggesting frontostriatal dopamine pathways are hypofunctional in ADHD.
“A decreased response-related ERN in children with ADHD like in this study would, however, be in line with the bulk of neuroimaging studies suggesting that frontostriatal dopamine pathways are hypofunctional in ADHD (Bush et al., 2005; Castellanos and Tannock, 2002; Dickstein et al., 2006; Durston, 2003).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 4.1. Response monitoring · p. 16These data, as well as the data by Jonkman and colleagues, suggest that Mph improves conscious error processing in ADHD, but not early error detection.
“Concludingly, these data, as well as the data by Jonkman and colleagues, suggest that Mph improves conscious error processing in ADHD, but not early error detection.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Jonkman et al., 2007 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 4.2. Feedback monitoring · p. 16The P2a component increases when the task relevance of stimuli increases.
“this component has repeatedly been found to increase when the task relevance of stimuli increases (Falkenstein et al., 2003; Potts, 2004).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 4.2. Feedback monitoring · p. 16The LPP is elicited by highly arousing pleasant and unpleasant pictures and is thought to reflect increased attention to affective-motivational stimuli.
“The LPP is elicited by highly arousing pleasant and unpleasant pictures and is thought to reflect increased attention to affective-motivational stimuli (Cuthbert et al., 2000; Hajcak et al., 2006; Schupp et al., 2000)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted).
Premisecitation§ 4.2. Feedback monitoring · p. 17Recent studies propose that the response-locked Pe and feedback-locked P3 have a similar neurobiological source.
“recent studies, proposing that both components have a similar neurobiological source (see for an overview: Overbeek et al., 2005).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Overbeek et al., 2005 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 4.4. Conclusions · p. 17This deficit is reflected by decreased response monitoring components (ERN and Pe) and diminished learning effects on the feedback-related components (prefeedback SPN, P2a).
“This is reflected by decreased response monitoring components (ERN and Pe) and diminished learning effects on the feedback-related components (prefeedback SPN, P2a).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationcitation§ 4.2. Feedback monitoring · p. 17The enlarged feedback P3 to negative feedback may be the reflection of updating task-rules from long-term memory in response to error feedback.
“which may be the reflection of updating task-rules from long-term memory in response to error feedback (Donchin and Coles, 1988).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Donchin and Coles, 1988 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ 4.2. Feedback monitoring · p. 16The clinical children in this study may not benefit from the affective value of negative feedback like the TD children do, i.e. they may suffer from decreased 'motivated attention'.
“The clinical children in this study may not benefit from the affective value of negative feedback like the TD children do, i.e. they may suffer from decreased 'motivated attention' (Vuilleumier, 2005).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Vuilleumier, 2005 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 4.2. Feedback monitoring · p. 16The LPP has been hypothesised to index perceptual processing in the visual cortex that is facilitated or amplified by amygdala-activity.
“The LPP has been hypothesised to index perceptual processing in the visual cortex that is facilitated or amplified by amygdala-activity (Bradley et al., 2003; Hajcak et al., 2006).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown data§ 4.3. Feedback anticipation · p. 17Medication-free children with ADHD did not learn to predict the negative feedback, and the negative feedback kept its relevance during the whole task.
“suggesting that they did not learn to predict the negative feedback, and that the negative feedback kept its relevance during the whole task.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown data§ 4.4. Conclusions · p. 17Overall, this study shows that error and feedback-related ERPs are a useful tool for (1) dissociating ADHD from ASD and (2) elucidating medication effects in ADHD on specific aspects of EFs.
“Overall, this study shows that error and feedback-related ERPs are a useful tool for (1) dissociating ADHD from ASD and (2) elucidating medication effects in ADHD on specific aspects of EFs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
The DISC-IV ADHD section is a valid measure for ADHD symptoms.
“the ADHD subscales of the DISC-IV (attentional problems or hyperactive-impulsive problems).”
The paper relies on this without support.
The CSBQ is a valid measure of social functioning in children.
“Additional information on the children's social functioning was derived from the CSBQ.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Differences between the first and second sections of the task reflect learning.
“The ERN amplitude at Fz differed between the first and second sections, which is reflected by an interactions between response type and section”
“this learning effect differed between groups”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Groen and colleagues found that participants with PDD-NOS did not differ from a TDC group in their outcome-evoked P3, suggesting that feedback processing was intact in this patient group.
“The participants with PDD-NOS did not differ from a TDC group in their outcome-evoked P3, suggesting that feedback processing was intact in this patient group.”
From Social “wanting” dysfunction in autism: neurobiological underpinnings and treatment implications (2012) · cites this paper as [101]
Statistics recomputed
Every reported test result, recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom. A result shows as not adding up only once an independent check has confirmed it.
- Consistentr(52) = 0.26reported p = .06 · recomputed p = .058
“r (52) = .26, p = .06”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Self-check results appear here once an independent check has confirmed them.
Cites
Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences
Stevens, J. P. (2012) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203843130 · Cited by 10,652 · see citing works
Lord, C., Rutter, M., & Le Couteur, A. (1994) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/bf02172145 · Cited by 9,065 · see citing works
A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact
Gratton, G., Coles, M. G. H., & Donchin, E. (1983) · Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/0013-4694(83)90135-9 · Cited by 5,055 · see citing works
Holroyd, C. B., & Coles, M. G. H. (2002) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.109.4.679 · Cited by 4,027 · see citing works
Meeting of minds: the medial frontal cortex and social cognition
Amodio, D. M., & Frith, C. D. (2006) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1884 · Cited by 3,782 · see citing works
Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating?
Donchin, E., & Coles, M. G. H. (1988) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00058027 · Cited by 3,585 · see citing works
SHAFFER, D., FISHER, P., LUCAS, C. P., DULCAN, M. K., & SCHWAB-STONE, M. E. (2000) · Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1097/00004583-200001000-00014 · Cited by 3,505 · see citing works
The role of the medial frontal cortex in cognitive control
Ridderinkhof, K. R., Ullsperger, M., Crone, E. A., & Nieuwenhuis, S. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1100301 · Cited by 2,974 · see citing works
A neural system for error detection and compensation
Gehring, W. J., Goss, B., Coles, M. G. H., Meyer, D. E., & Donchin, E. (1993) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1993.tb00586.x · Cited by 2,862 · see citing works
Berridge, C. W., & Waterhouse, B. D. (2003) · Brain Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0165-0173(03)00143-7 · Cited by 2,529 · see citing works
How brains beware: neural mechanisms of emotional attention
Vuilleumier, P. (2005) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.10.011 · Cited by 2,162 · see citing works
Cuthbert, B. N., Schupp, H. T., Bradley, M. M., Birbaumer, N., & Lang, P. J. (2000) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0301-0511(99)00044-7 · Cited by 1,900 · see citing works
Neuroscience of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: the search for endophenotypes
Castellanos, F. X., & Tannock, R. (2002) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn896 · Cited by 1,827 · see citing works
Falkenstein, M., Hohnsbein, J., Hoormann, J., & Blanke, L. (1991) · Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/0013-4694(91)90062-9 · Cited by 1,706 · see citing works
Decision making, the P3, and the locus coeruleus–norepinephrine system
Nieuwenhuis, S., Aston-Jones, G., & Cohen, J. D. (2005) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.131.4.510 · Cited by 1,678 · see citing works
Miltner, W. H. R., Braun, C. H., & Coles, M. G. H. (1997) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.1997.9.6.788 · Cited by 1,530 · see citing works
Autism screening questionnaire: diagnostic validity
Berument, S. K., Rutter, M., Lord, C., Pickles, A., & Bailey, A. (1999) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.175.5.444 · Cited by 1,464 · see citing works
Affective picture processing: The late positive potential is modulated by motivational relevance
Schupp, H. T., Cuthbert, B. N., Bradley, M. M., Cacioppo, J. T., Ito, T., & Lang, P. J. (2000) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/1469-8986.3720257 · Cited by 1,361 · see citing works
Nieuwenhuis, S., Ridderinkhof, K. R., Blom, J., Band, G. P. H., & Kok, A. (2001) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/1469-8986.3850752 · Cited by 1,170 · see citing works
sagvolden, T., johansen, E. B., aase, H., & russell, V. A. (2005) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x05000075 · Cited by 1,035 · see citing works
Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences
Gonzalez, R. (2003) · The American Statistician · doi:10.1198/tas.2003.s213 · Cited by 884 · see citing works
The neural correlates of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: an ALE meta‐analysis
Dickstein, S. G., Bannon, K., Xavier Castellanos, F., & Milham, M. P. (2006) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2006.01671.x · Cited by 745 · see citing works
Brief Report: Specific Executive Function Profiles in Three Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Ozonoff, S., & Jensen, J. (1999) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1023/a:1023052913110 · Cited by 724 · see citing works
Bush, G., Valera, E. M., & Seidman, L. J. (2005) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.01.034 · Cited by 714 · see citing works
Geurts, H. M., Verté, S., Oosterlaan, J., Roeyers, H., & Sergeant, J. A. (2004) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00276.x · Cited by 705 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Moreover, both ADHD and ASD have been related to executive functioning (EF) deficits (Geurts et al., 2004; Happé et al., 2006; Ozonoff and Jensen, 1999), although there is an ongoing discussion on the type of EF profile that is specific for each disorder.”
Happé, F., Booth, R., Charlton, R., & Hughes, C. (2006) · Brain and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2006.03.004 · Cited by 638 · see citing works
Overbeek, T. J. M., Nieuwenhuis, S., & Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2005) · Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1027/0269-8803.19.4.319 · Cited by 600 · see citing works
Hajcak, G., McDonald, N., & Simons, R. F. (2003) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/1469-8986.00107 · Cited by 553 · see citing works
Activation of the visual cortex in motivated attention
Bradley, M. M., Sabatinelli, D., Lang, P. J., Fitzsimmons, J. R., King, W., & Desai, P. (2003) · Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.1037/0735-7044.117.2.369 · Cited by 528 · see citing works
Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and social dysfunctioning
Nijmeijer, J. S., Minderaa, R. B., Buitelaar, J. K., Mulligan, A., Hartman, C. A., & Hoekstra, P. J. (2008) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2007.10.003 · Cited by 524 · see citing works
Self-citationA Multidisciplinary Approach to Anterior Attentional Functionsa
Stuss, D. T., Shallice, T., ALEXANDER, M. P., & Picton, T. W. (1995) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1995.tb38140.x · Cited by 518 · see citing works
Defining the broader phenotype of autism: genetic, brain, and behavioral perspectives
DAWSON, G., WEBB, S., SCHELLENBERG, G. D., DAGER, S., FRIEDMAN, S., AYLWARD, E., & RICHARDS, T. (2002) · Development and Psychopathology · doi:10.1017/s0954579402003103 · Cited by 467 · see citing works
Ronald, A., Simonoff, E., Kuntsi, J., Asherson, P., & Plomin, R. (2008) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01857.x · Cited by 466 · see citing works
Abnormal regional cerebral blood flow in childhood autism
Ohnishi, T. (2000) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/123.9.1838 · Cited by 439 · see citing works
Mundy, P. C. (2003) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/1469-7610.00165 · Cited by 435 · see citing works
Barry, R. J., Johnstone, S. J., & Clarke, A. R. (2003) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/s1388-2457(02)00363-2 · Cited by 434 · see citing works
Haznedar, M. M., Buchsbaum, M. S., Wei, T.-C., Hof, P. R., Cartwright, C., Bienstock, C. A., & Hollander, E. (2000) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.157.12.1994 · Cited by 420 · see citing works
Error-related psychophysiology and negative affect
Hajcak, G., McDonald, N. M., & Simons, R. F. (2004) · Brain and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2003.11.001 · Cited by 412 · see citing works
CHANDLER, S., CHARMAN, T., BAIRD, G., SIMONOFF, E., LOUCAS, T., MELDRUM, D., SCOTT, M., & PICKLES, A. (2007) · Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1097/chi.0b013e31812f7d8d · Cited by 410 · see citing works
A review of the biological bases of ADHD: What have we learned from imaging studies?
Durston, S. (2003) · Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews · doi:10.1002/mrdd.10079 · Cited by 388 · see citing works
O'Connell, R. G., Dockree, P. M., Bellgrove, M. A., Kelly, S. P., Hester, R., Garavan, H., Robertson, I. H., & Foxe, J. J. (2007) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2007.05477.x · Cited by 379 · see citing works
The Biological Basis of Social Interaction
Frith, U., & Frith, C. (2001) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/1467-8721.00137 · Cited by 376 · see citing works
An ERP index of task relevance evaluation of visual stimuli
Potts, G. F. (2004) · Brain and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2004.03.006 · Cited by 375 · see citing works
Neural Systems for Error Monitoring: Recent Findings and Theoretical Perspectives
Taylor, S. F., Stern, E. R., & Gehring, W. J. (2007) · The Neuroscientist · doi:10.1177/1073858406298184 · Cited by 368 · see citing works
Development of response-monitoring ERPs in 7-to 25-year-olds
Davies, P. L., Segalowitz, S. J., & Gavin, W. J. (2004) · Developmental Neuropsychology · doi:10.1207/s15326942dn2503_6 · Cited by 339 · see citing works
Potts, G. F., Martin, L. E., Burton, P., & Montague, P. R. (2006) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2006.18.7.1112 · Cited by 316 · see citing works
Abnormal Brain Activity Related to Performance Monitoring and Error Detection in Children with ADHD
Liotti, M., Pliszka, S. R., Perez, R., Kothmann, D., & Woldorff, M. G. (2005) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70274-0 · Cited by 290 · see citing works
Drug-induced stimulation and suppression of action monitoring in healthy volunteers
de Bruijn, E. R. A., Hulstijn, W., Verkes, R. J., Ruigt, G. S. F., & Sabbe, B. G. C. (2004) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00213-004-1915-6 · Cited by 282 · see citing works
The neuropsychopharmacology of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder
Pliszka, S. R. (2005) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2004.08.026 · Cited by 276 · see citing works
Attending to affect: appraisal strategies modulate the electrocortical response to arousing pictures
Hajcak, G., Moser, J. S., & Simons, R. F. (2006) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/1528-3542.6.3.517 · Cited by 273 · see citing works
Anti-hyperactivity medication: methylphenidate and amphetamine
Seeman, P., & Madras, B. K. (1998) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/sj.mp.4000421 · Cited by 252 · see citing works
Executive control in the Simon effect: an electromyographic and distributional analysis
Burle, B., Possamaï, C.-A., Vidal, F., Bonnet, M., & Hasbroucq, T. (2002) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-002-0105-6 · Cited by 249 · see citing works
Autistic symptoms in children with attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder
Clark, T., Feehan, C., Tinline, C., & Vostanis, P. (1999) · European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1007/s007870050083 · Cited by 227 · see citing works
Evidence for an Error Monitoring Deficit in Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
Schachar, R. J., Chen, S., Logan, G. D., Ornstein, T. J., Crosbie, J., Ickowicz, A., & Pakulak, A. (2004) · Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology · doi:10.1023/b:jacp.0000026142.11217.f2 · Cited by 221 · see citing works
Change detection in children with autism: an auditory event-related fMRI study
Gomot, M., Bernard, F. A., Davis, M. H., Belmonte, M. K., Ashwin, C., Bullmore, E. T., & Baron-Cohen, S. (2006) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.07.027 · Cited by 199 · see citing works
van Meel, C. S., Heslenfeld, D. J., Oosterlaan, J., & Sergeant, J. A. (2007) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2006.05.011 · Cited by 187 · see citing works
Hartman, C. A., Luteijn, E., Serra, M., & Minderaa, R. (2006) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-005-0072-z · Cited by 187 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The TD children, moreover, scored significantly lower on a parental questionnaire measuring social dysfunction: the Children’s Social Behaviour Questionnaire (CSBQ: Hartman et al., 2006).”
Self-citationSustained attention in children with autism
Garretson, H. B., Fein, D., & Waterhouse, L. (1990) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/bf02206860 · Cited by 186 · see citing works
Overtoom, C. C. E., Kenemans, J. L., Verbaten, M. N., Kemner, C., van der Molen, M. W., van Engeland, H., Buitelaar, J. K., & Koelega, H. S. (2002) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s0006-3223(01)01290-2 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
ERP correlates of impaired error monitoring in children with ADHD
Wiersema, J. R., van der Meere, J. J., & Roeyers, H. (2005) · Journal of Neural Transmission · doi:10.1007/s00702-005-0276-6 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
Leuthold, H., & Sommer, W. (1999) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/s1388-2457(98)00058-3 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Brain potentials related to self-generated and external information used for performance monitoring
Müller, S., Möller, J., Rodríguez‐Fornells, A., & Münte, T. F. (2004) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2004.07.009 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
Short-term mobilization of processing resources is revealed in the event-related potential
Falkenstein, M., Hoormann, J., Hohnsbein, J., & Kleinsorge, T. (2003) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/1469-8986.00109 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Response monitoring, the error-related negativity, and differences in social behavior in autism
Henderson, H., Schwartz, C., Mundy, P., Burnette, C., Sutton, S., Zahka, N., & Pradella, A. (2006) · Brain and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2005.12.009 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
CLINICAL USE OF RATING SCALES IN DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF ATTENTION-DEFICIT/HYPERACTIVITY DISORDER
Conners, C. K. (1999) · Pediatric Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/s0031-3955(05)70159-0 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Stimulus-preceding negativity induced by fear: a manifestation of affective anticipation
Böcker, K. B. E., Baas, J. M. P., Kenemans, J. L., & Verbaten, M. N. (2001) · International Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1016/s0167-8760(01)00180-5 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
Pervasive Developmental Disorder Not Otherwise Specified
Towbin, K. E. (2005) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470939345.ch6 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
What happens after a hyperactive child commits an error?
Sergeant, J. A., & van der Meere, J. (1988) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/0165-1781(88)90058-3 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Davies, P. L., Segalowitz, S. J., Dywan, J., & Pailing, P. E. (2001) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0301-0511(01)00080-1 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
van Meel, C. S., Oosterlaan, J., Heslenfeld, D. J., & Sergeant, J. A. (2005) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.03.018 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Jonkman, L. M., van Melis, J. J. M., Kemner, C., & Markus, C. R. (2007) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2007.08.004 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Effect of Sensory Feedback on Immediate Object Imitation in Children with Autism
Ingersoll, B., Schreibman, L., & Tran, Q. H. (2003) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1023/b:jadd.0000006003.26667.f8 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Event‐Related Potentials to Different Feedback Stimuli
Chwilla, D. J., & BRUNIA, C. H. M. (1991) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1991.tb00400.x · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Jensen, V. K., Larrieu, J. A., & Mack, K. K. (1997) · Clinical Pediatrics · doi:10.1177/000992289703601001 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Error-Correction Problems in Autism: Evidence for a Monitoring Impairment?
Russell, J., & Jarrold, C. (1998) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1023/a:1026009203333 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Developmental Change in Feedback Processing as Reflected by Phasic Heart Rate Changes.
Crone, E. A., Jennings, J. R., & van der Molen, M. W. (2004) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/0012-1649.40.6.1228 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Burgio-Murphy, A., Klorman, R., Shaywitz, S. E., Fletcher, J. M., Marchione, K. E., Holahan, J. M., Stuebing, K. K., Thatcher, J. E., & Shaywitz, B. A. (2006) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2006.12.003 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
de Sonneville, L. M. J., Njiokiktjien, C., & Bos, H. (1994) · Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/01688639408402700 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Error-related electrocortical responses in 10-year-old children and young adults
Santesso, D. L., Segalowitz, S. J., & Schmidt, L. A. (2006) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2006.00514.x · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Dawson, G., Osterling, J., Rinaldi, J., Carver, L., & McPartland, J. (2001) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1023/a:1010751404865 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Toward localizing genes underlying cerebral asymmetry and mental health
Smalley, S. L., Loo, S. K., YANG, M. H., & Cantor, R. M. (2005) · American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B Neuropsychiatric Genetics · doi:10.1002/ajmg.b.30141 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Groen, Y., Wijers, A. A., Mulder, L. J. M., Minderaa, R. B., & Althaus, M. (2007) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2007.07.006 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Self-citationEffect of positive and negative emotion on stimulus‐preceding negativity prior to feedback stimuli
Kotani, Y., Hiraku, S., Suda, K., & Aihara, Y. (2001) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/1469-8986.3860873 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Krusch, D. A., Klorman, R., Brumaghim, J. T., Fitzpatrick, P. A., Borgstedt, A. D., & Strauss, J. (1996) · Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology · doi:10.1007/bf01670104 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Post-error adaptation in adults with high functioning autism
Bogte, H., Flamma, B., van der Meere, J., & van Engeland, H. (2007) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.12.020 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Althaus, M., de Sonneville, L. M. J., Minderaa, R. B., Hensen, L. G. N., & Til, R. B. (1996) · Child Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/09297049608401347 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Self-citationERD as an index of anticipatory attention? Effects of stimulus degradation
Bastiaansen, M. C. M., Böcker, K. B. E., & Brunia, C. H. M. (2002) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/1469-8986.3910016 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
ERPs and Eye Movements Reflect Atypical Visual Perception in Pervasive Developmental Disorder
Kemner, C., & van Engeland, H. (2005) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-005-0041-6 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Altered Response Evaluation: Monitoring of Late Responses After Administration of D-Amphetamine
de Bruijn, E. R. A., Hulstijn, W., Verkes, R. J., Ruigt, G. S. F., & Sabbe, B. G. C. (2005) · Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1027/0269-8803.19.4.311 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Althaus, M., de Sonneville, L. M. J., Minderaa, R. B., Hensen, L. G. N., & Til, R. B. (1996) · Child Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/09297049608401348 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Gehring, 1990, The error-related negativity: an event-related brain potential accompanying errors, Psychophysiology, 27, S34
- Van Meel CS, Heslenfeld DJ, Oosterlaan J, Luman M, Sergeant JA. ERPs associated with anticipation and evaluation of monetary reward and punishment in children with ADHD. In: Adaptive control in attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder, 2005 [Chapter 4].
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Reaction time variability in ADHD: A meta-analytic review of 319 studies
Kofler, M. J., Rapport, M. D., Sarver, D. E., Raiker, J. S., Orban, S. A., Friedman, L. M., & Kolomeyer, E. G. (2013) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2013.06.001 · Cited by 648 · see citing works
Rommelse, N. N. J., Geurts, H. M., Franke, B., Buitelaar, J. K., & Hartman, C. A. (2011) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.02.015 · Cited by 429 · see citing works
Social “wanting” dysfunction in autism: neurobiological underpinnings and treatment implications
Kohls, G., Chevallier, C., Troiani, V., & Schultz, R. T. (2012) · Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders · doi:10.1186/1866-1955-4-10 · Cited by 197 · see citing works
A trans-diagnostic perspective on obsessive-compulsive disorder
Gillan, C. M., Fineberg, N. A., & Robbins, T. W. (2017) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291716002786 · Cited by 158 · see citing works
Early adversity and neural correlates of executive function: Implications for academic adjustment
McDermott, J. M., Westerlund, A., Zeanah, C. H., Nelson, C. A., & Fox, N. A. (2012) · Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2011.09.008 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
The neurobiological link between OCD and ADHD
Brem, S., Grünblatt, E., Drechsler, R., Riederer, P., & Walitza, S. (2014) · ADHD Attention Deficit and Hyperactivity Disorders · doi:10.1007/s12402-014-0146-x · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Atypical brain responses to reward cues in autism as revealed by event-related potentials
Kohls, G., Peltzer, J., Schulte-Rüther, M., Kamp-Becker, I., Remschmidt, H., Herpertz-Dahlmann, B., & Konrad, K. (2011) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-011-1177-1 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Feedback and reward processing in high-functioning autism
Larson, M. J., South, M., Krauskopf, E., Clawson, A., & Crowley, M. J. (2011) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2010.11.006 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Kernbach, J. M., Satterthwaite, T. D., Bassett, D. S., Smallwood, J., Margulies, D., Krall, S., Shaw, P., Varoquaux, G., Thirion, B., Konrad, K., et al. (2018) · Translational Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41398-018-0179-6 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
D'Cruz, A.-M., Mosconi, M. W., Ragozzino, M. E., Cook, E. H., & Sweeney, J. A. (2016) · Translational Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/tp.2016.161 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Bellato, A., Norman, L., Idrees, I., Ogawa, C. Y., Waitt, A., Zuccolo, P. F., Tye, C., Radua, J., Groom, M. J., & Shephard, E. (2021) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.10.018 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Fosco, W. D., Kofler, M. J., Alderson, R. M., Tarle, S. J., Raiker, J. S., & Sarver, D. E. (2019) · Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10802-018-0504-9 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Groen, Y., Mulder, L. J. M., Wijers, A. A., Minderaa, R. B., & Althaus, M. (2009) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2009.05.004 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Self-citationWerner, J., Weisbrod, M., Resch, F., Roessner, V., & Bender, S. (2011) · Behavioral and Brain Functions · doi:10.1186/1744-9081-7-38 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
- Authors
- Groen, Y., Wijers, A. A., Mulder, L. J. M., Waggeveld, B., Minderaa, R. B., & Althaus, M.
- Affiliations
- University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
- University of Groningen (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Groen, Yvonne
- ORCID
- Groen, Yvonne
- Venue
- Clinical Neurophysiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-11
- Volume
- 119
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2476-2493
- ISSN
- 1388-2457 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2028259507
- Semantic Scholar
- eefb0ca1cd124ad8dc28d01d7206f56cf3241c37
- Cited by
- 153
- References
- 90
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 7.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- research.rug.nl
- Licence
- Locations
- Clinical Neurophysiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
- Keywords
- attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, autism spectrum disorder, error processing, feedback processing, performance monitoring, error-related negativity, error positivity, methylphenidate, late positive potential, emotional feedback, children
- MeSH terms
- Analysis of Variance, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Autistic Disorder, Child, Contingent Negative Variation, Discrimination Learning, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Feedback, Female, Humans, Male, Numerical Analysis, Computer-Assisted, Photic Stimulation, Probability Learning, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reaction Time, Time Factors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review