The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Distinction between Perceptual and Attentional Processing in Working Memory Tasks: A Study of Phase-locked and Induced Oscillatory Brain Dynamics
Abstract
Working memory involves the short-term storage and manipulation of information necessary for cognitive performance, including comprehension, learning, reasoning and planning. Although electroencephalogram (EEG) rhythms are modulated during working memory, the temporal relationship of EEG oscillations with the eliciting event has not been well studied. In particular, the dynamics of the neural network supporting memory processes may be best captured in induced oscillations, characterized by a loose temporal link with the stimulus. In order to differentiate induced from evoked functional processes, the present study proposes a time-frequency analysis of the 3 to 30 Hz EEG oscillatory activity in a verbal n-back working memory paradigm. Control tasks were designed to identify oscillatory activity related to stimulus presentation (passive task) and focused attention to the stimulus (detection task). Evoked theta activity (4–8 Hz) phase-locked to the visual stimulus was evidenced in the parieto-occipital region for all tasks. In parallel, induced theta activity was recorded in the frontal region for detection and n-back memory tasks, but not for the passive task, suggesting its dependency on focused attention to the stimulus. Sustained induced oscillatory activity was identified in relation to working memory in the theta and beta (15–25 Hz) frequency bands, larger for the highest memory load. Its late occurrence limited to nonmatched items suggests that it could be related to item retention and active maintenance for further task requirements. Induced theta and beta activities displayed respectively a frontal and parietal topographical distribution, providing further functional information on the fronto-posterior network supporting working memory.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain
Corbetta, M., & Shulman, G. L. (2002) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn755 · Cited by 12,881
Temporal dynamics of brain activation during a working memory task
Cohen, J. D., Perlstein, W. M., Braver, T. S., Nystrom, L. E., Noll, D. C., Jonides, J., & Smith, E. E. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/386604a0 · Cited by 1,876
Frontal theta activity in humans increases with memory load in a working memory task
Jensen, O., & Tesche, C. D. (2002) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1046/j.1460-9568.2002.01975.x · Cited by 1,379
Aftanas, L. I., & Golocheikine, S. A. (2001) · Neuroscience Letters · doi:10.1016/s0304-3940(01)02094-8 · Cited by 865
Gating of human theta oscillations by a working memory task
Raghavachari, S., Kahana, M. J., Rizzuto, D. S., Caplan, J. B., Kirschen, M. P., Bourgeois, B., Madsen, J. R., & Lisman, J. E. (2001) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.21-09-03175.2001 · Cited by 792
Theta and gamma oscillations during encoding predict subsequent recall
Sederberg, P. B., Kahana, M. J., Howard, M. W., Donner, E. J., & Madsen, J. R. (2003) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.23-34-10809.2003 · Cited by 750
Human theta oscillations exhibit task dependence during virtual maze navigation
Kahana, M. J., Sekuler, R., Caplan, J. B., Kirschen, M., & Madsen, J. R. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/21645 · Cited by 649
Medial prefrontal cortex generates frontal midline theta rhythm
Ishii, R., Shinosaki, K., Ukai, S., Inouye, T., Ishihara, T., Yoshimine, T., Hirabuki, N., Asada, H., Kihara, T., Robinson, S. E., et al. (1999) · NeuroReport · doi:10.1097/00001756-199903170-00003 · Cited by 494
The effects of memory load on event-related EEG desynchronization and synchronization
Krause, C. M., Sillanmäki, L., Koivisto, M., Saarela, C., Häggqvist, A., Laine, M., & Hämäläinen, H. (2000) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/s1388-2457(00)00429-6 · Cited by 246
Cited by
Beta-band oscillations—Signalling the status quo?
Engel, A. K., & Fries, P. (2010) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2010.02.015 · Cited by 2,953
The Mind and Brain of Short-Term Memory
Jonides, J., Lewis, R. L., Nee, D. E., Lustig, C. A., Berman, M. G., & Moore, K. S. (2008) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093615 · Cited by 957
Control mechanisms in working memory: A possible function of EEG theta oscillations
Sauseng, P., Griesmayr, B., Freunberger, R., & Klimesch, W. (2010) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.12.006 · Cited by 849
The functional significance of delta oscillations in cognitive processing
Harmony, T. (2013) · Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnint.2013.00083 · Cited by 788
The ups and downs of beta oscillations in sensorimotor cortex
Kilavik, B. E., Zaepffel, M., Brovelli, A., MacKay, W. A., & Riehle, A. (2013) · Experimental Neurology · doi:10.1016/j.expneurol.2012.09.014 · Cited by 787
Metadata
- Authors
- Deiber, M.-P., Missonnier, P., Bertrand, O., Gold, G., Fazio-Costa, L., Ibañez, V., & Giannakopoulos, P.
- Venue
- Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
- Publisher
- MIT Press - Journals
- Published
- 2007-01-01
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 158-172
- ISSN
- 0898-929X (ISSN-L)
- 1530-8898
- OpenAlex
- W2099082130
- Cited by
- 257
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 6.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Distinction between Perceptual and Attentional Processing in Working Memory Tasks: A Study of Phase-locked and Induced Oscillatory Brain Dynamics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1162/jocn.2007.19.1.158
- The paper
- Deiber, M.-P., Missonnier, P., Bertrand, O., Gold, G., Fazio-Costa, L., Ibañez, V., & Giannakopoulos, P. (2007). Distinction between Perceptual and Attentional Processing in Working Memory Tasks: A Study of Phase-locked and Induced Oscillatory Brain Dynamics. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2007.19.1.158
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.