The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An fMRI Investigation of Spontaneous Mental State Inference for Moral Judgment
Open accessAbstract
Human moral judgment depends critically on “theory of mind,” the capacity to represent the mental states of agents. Recent studies suggest that the right TPJ (RTPJ) and, to lesser extent, the left TPJ (LTPJ), the precuneus (PC), and the medial pFC (MPFC) are robustly recruited when participants read explicit statements of an agent's beliefs and then judge the moral status of the agent's action. Real-world interactions, by contrast, often require social partners to infer each other's mental states. The current study uses fMRI to probe the role of these brain regions in supporting spontaneous mental state inference in the service of moral judgment. Participants read descriptions of a protagonist's action and then either (i) “moral” facts about the action's effect on another person or (ii) “nonmoral” facts about the situation. The RTPJ, PC, and MPFC were recruited selectively for moral over nonmoral facts, suggesting that processing moral stimuli elicits spontaneous mental state inference. In a second experiment, participants read the same scenarios, but explicit statements of belief preceded the facts: Protagonists believed their actions would cause harm or not. The response in the RTPJ, PC, and LTPJ was again higher for moral facts but also distinguished between neutral and negative outcomes. Together, the results illuminate two aspects of theory of mind in moral judgment: (1) spontaneous belief inference and (2) stimulus-driven belief integration.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Activity in the RTPJ while participants make moral judgments about attempted and accidental harms shows the same asymmetry: greater activity for attempted than accidental harms (9, 10, 24, 25).”
From Disruption of the right temporoparietal junction with transcranial magnetic stimulation reduces the role of beliefs in moral judgments (2010) · cites this paper as [25]
Citations
Cites
An fMRI Investigation of Emotional Engagement in Moral Judgment
Greene, J. D., Sommerville, R. B., Nystrom, L. E., Darley, J. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1062872 · Cited by 4,561
The Neural Bases of Cognitive Conflict and Control in Moral Judgment
Greene, J. D., Nystrom, L. E., Engell, A. D., Darley, J. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2004) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2004.09.027 · Cited by 2,620
People thinking about thinking peopleThe role of the temporo-parietal junction in “theory of mind”
Saxe, R., & Kanwisher, N. (2003) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00230-1 · Cited by 2,316 · cited 14×
“A whole-brain random effects analysis of the data replicated results of previous studies using the same task (Saxe & Wexler, 2005; Saxe & Kanwisher, 2003 ), revealing a higher BOLD response during belief, as compared with photo stories, in the RTPJ, LTPJ, dMPFC, mMPFC, vMPFC, PC, right temporal pole, and right anterio…”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialSelf-citationCan cognitive processes be inferred from neuroimaging data?
POLDRACK, R. (2006) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.12.004 · Cited by 2,249
Voluntary orienting is dissociated from target detection in human posterior parietal cortex
Corbetta, M., Kincade, J. M., Ollinger, J. M., McAvoy, M. P., & Shulman, G. L. (2000) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/73009 · Cited by 1,816
Cognitive neuroscience of human social behaviour
Adolphs, R. (2003) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1056 · Cited by 1,657
Damage to the prefrontal cortex increases utilitarian moral judgements
Koenigs, M., Young, L., Adolphs, R., Tranel, D., Cushman, F., Hauser, M., & Damasio, A. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05631 · Cited by 1,545
Self-citationOther minds in the brain: a functional imaging study of “theory of mind” in story comprehension.
Fletcher, P. (1995) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/0010-0277(95)00692-r · Cited by 1,522
Gallagher, H. L., Happé, F., Brunswick, N., Fletcher, P. C., Frith, U., & Frith, C. D. (2000) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/s0028-3932(99)00053-6 · Cited by 1,394
The Role of Conscious Reasoning and Intuition in Moral Judgment
Cushman, F. A., Young, L., & HAUSER, M. D. (2006) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01834.x · Cited by 1,061
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Perner, 2006, Thinking of mental and other representations: The roles of left and right temporo-parietal junction., Social Neuroscience, 1, 245, 10.1080/17470910600989896 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–209 of 209
Component Neural Networks of Morality
Ngo, L. (2015) · DukeSpace (Duke University)
Cenka, K., Spaccasassi, C., Petkovic, S., Pezzetta, R., Vicario, C. M., Arcara, G., & Avenanti, A. (2026) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2026.121885
Brain-inspired large model mindreading
Jin, J., Hu, Y., Wang, Z., Pan, Y., Ma, B., Dong, B., Dong, J., & Pei, G. (2026) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2026.122108 · Cited by 2
Sweetman, J., & McManus, R. M. (2026) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2026.104972
Moral inference under stress: When we doubt our beliefs about good people
Schulreich, S., Siegel, J. Z., Stöffel, T., Crockett, M. J., & Schwabe, L. (2026) · Psychoneuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2026.107972
Oliveira, G. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-38971-9_374-1
Neural Correlates of Moral Judgment in Dilemma Versus Non‐Dilemma Contexts
Fu, J., Song, D., Tolomeo, S., & Yu, R. (2026) · Brain and Behavior · doi:10.1002/brb3.71864
Social decision-making, morality, and dark personalities
Votinov, M. (2026) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-34080-2.00001-9
Anterior cingulate cortex : contributions to social cognition
Apps, M. A. J. (2012) · Royal Holloway Digital Repository (Royal Holloway University of London)
Metadata
- Authors
- Young, L., & Saxe, R.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
- Publisher
- MIT Press - Journals
- Published
- 2009-07-01
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1396-1405
- ISSN
- 0898-929X (ISSN-L)
- 1530-8898
- OpenAlex
- W2142847572
- Semantic Scholar
- ba042938610f9a26e4a5f3fa0f5c78fdc2e798c9
- Cited by
- 208
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 18
- FWCI
- 6.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- cc-by-nc
- Locations
- Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Keywords
- moral judgment, theory of mind, mental state inference, right temporoparietal junction, precuneus, medial prefrontal cortex, moral facts, social cognition
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Analysis of Variance, Brain Mapping, Concept Formation, Culture, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Judgment, Functional Laterality, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Morals, Neuropsychological Tests, Oxygen, Parietal Lobe, Reaction Time, Social Perception, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
